Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 03 2022

Consensual review edit

File:The_Soviet_Union_1964_CPA_3089_souvenir_sheet_(Soviet_Conquest_of_Space._1st_satellite,_1st_pennant_on_the_Moon,_1st_view_of_the_Moon_far_side,_1st_man_in_space,_1st_group_in_space,_1st_woman_in_space).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Soviet Conquest of Space. JPG. Normal paper. --Matsievsky 02:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree, already nominated and supported as PNG file. --XRay 03:50, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
  • In that case, I take back my support, I   Oppose --Poco a poco 08:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 08:38, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

File:The_Soviet_Union_1964_CPA_3048_block_of_4_stamps_(Centenary_of_Moscow_Zoo._Asian_elephant_or_Asiatic_elephant_(Elephas_maximus)).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Block of 4 stamps Asian elephant. Resolution 600 dpi. --Matsievsky 16:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Effective resolution is short of that expected for QI, even if over 2MP. --Acroterion 01:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree; this is good enough. These are tiny postage stamps and a higher resolution would not help. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose PNG file also nominated. --XRay 09:13, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 08:35, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Teatro_Romea,_Murcia,_España,_2022-07-12,_DD_56.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Romea Theatre, Murcia, Spain --Poco a poco 07:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Support OK. --Peulle 09:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
      Oppose It's a shame, there is motion blur due to camera shake. Let's see what others think. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 06:32, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support I'm not seeing camera shake; I'm just seeing that the left side is somewhat unsharp, but it looks OK at 70% of full size, so I think this photo is good enough to promote. -- Ikan Kekek 10:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Slight blurriness due to perspective correction but tolerable.--Ermell 17:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 08:34, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

File:The_Soviet_Union_1964_CPA_3026I_stamp_(92nd_and_94th_anniversaries_of_the_birth_of_Lenin._Portrait_of_Vladimir_Lenin).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The Soviet Union 1964 CPA 3026 stamp (Portrait of Vladimir Lenin).jpg. --Matsievsky 05:45, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Same reason as the first image of the group. 1) Not made by a Wikimedian 2) Resolution too low --Hangman'sDeath 07:15, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support 1) The scan is variety of photos created by a Wikimedian. 2) This postage stamp is little miniature. --Matsievsky 14:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Below 2 mp resolution.--Peulle 08:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Info Nominator's vote removed. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:08, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Hangman'sDeath --Mike1979 Russia 08:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too small. --Smial 14:25, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 08:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

File:The_Soviet_Union_1964_CPA_3026_stamp_(92nd_and_94th_anniversaries_of_the_birth_of_Lenin._Portrait_of_Vladimir_Lenin).png edit

 

  • Nomination The Soviet Union 1964 CPA 3026I stamp (Portrait of Vladimir Lenin).png. --Matsievsky 05:45, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Same reason as the first image of the group. 1) Not made by a Wikimedian 2) Resolution too low --Hangman'sDeath 07:15, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support 1) The scan is variety of photos created by a Wikimedian. 2) This postage stamp is little miniature. --Matsievsky 14:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Below 2 mp resolution.--Peulle 08:45, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Info Vote by nominator removed. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:05, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Hangman'sDeath --Mike1979 Russia 08:27, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too small. --Smial 14:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 08:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

File:The_Soviet_Union_1964_CPA_3026_stamp_(92nd_and_94th_anniversaries_of_the_birth_of_Lenin._Portrait_of_Vladimir_Lenin).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The Soviet Union 1964 CPA 3026I stamp (Portrait of Vladimir Lenin).jpg. --Matsievsky 05:45, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Same reason as the first image of the group. 1) Not made by a Wikimedian 2) Resolution too low --Hangman'sDeath 07:15, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support 1) The scan is variety of photos created by a Wikimedian. 2) This postage stamp is little miniature. --Matsievsky 14:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Lower than 2 mp resolution.--Peulle 08:40, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Info Nominator's vote removed --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Hangman'sDeath --Mike1979 Russia 08:27, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too small. --Smial 14:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 08:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Geneva_International_Motor_Show_2018,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(1X7A1587).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Aston Martin Vantage at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 15:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Lot of space in the foreground, The two man behind the left side of the car are too much disturbing. The perspective isn't good. The compo doesn't work IMO. --Sebring12Hrs 08:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Not so bad IMO --Ermell 08:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ermell. Sharp car, and nothing else ruins the photo for me. -- Ikan Kekek 18:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support also per Ermell. And I like the slight reflection of the car in the foreground. It is not a bad composition --FlocciNivis 17:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support The two people in the background are not very conducive to the composition, but unlike many other photos of cars that have been presented here recently, only a minor flaw. Technically the shot looks ok to me, the inclusion of the reflection in the foreground I consider rather successful. --Smial 01:53, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 08:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Mirador_astronómico_de_Sicasumbre_2022_004.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View from the astronomical viewpoint of Sicasumbre, Lanzarote --Mike Peel 19:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The perspective and composition are very good, but I have the impression that the road in the valley is distorted as some other parts further away in the image. Could I get some other opinions? --FlocciNivis 16:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
@FlocciNivis: Could you be a bit more specific about which parts you think are distorted? They shouldn't be... Thanks. Mike Peel 14:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
BTW, File:Mirador astronómico de Sicasumbre 2022 007.jpg is quite similar but from a different position, maybe a comparison of the features between the two might help? Thanks. Mike Peel 14:29, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Okay, looking at the other image I have to say it's fine. I was focusing too much on this small road in the valley, which is probably pretty far away and thought it was a bit stretched (maybe due to distortion) at some parts. I don't think so anymore and it's a good picture overall --FlocciNivis 17:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support A little bright and hazy but good overall. -- Ikan Kekek 16:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 08:23, 2 November 2022 (UTC)