Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 12 2023

Consensual review edit

File:Cesenatico_-_Porto_Canale_Leonardesco_-_2023-09-01_16-07-35_001.jpg edit

 

  I withdraw my nomination Withdraw Anna.Massini 08:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 08:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:06010_UK_Shetland_Lerwick_Hays_dock_S_V-P.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Small craft moored at Hays Dock - Lerwick, Shetland - seen from S --Virtual-Pano 09:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:46, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Crop is IMO not pleasant. Top of the mast should be included. --Vasmar1 17:06, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Vasmar1. Unfavorable crop. --Milseburg 13:23, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Normally, I like to see all of the boat but in this case, the photographer's perspective is focused more on colors and reflections. IMHO it is well done and QI. If the type of wooden boat is of a specific type, it should be documented in the image information. --GRDN711 13:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Interesting view and good quality -- Spurzem 13:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Very pleasing to the eye. --Ktkvtsh 18:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine. -- Ikan Kekek 18:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 11:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

File:"Sunset_with_Crab_Fishermen"_by_Hendrik_Willem_Mesdag.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination "Sunset with Crab Fishermen" by Hendrik Willem Mesdag, undated, Dorderchts Museum. --Kritzolina 16:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose IMHO the white balance is not correct, fixable? --F. Riedelio 13:06, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Ktkvtsh 18:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 11:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Lenina_Prospekt_PTZ_(img4).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Lenina Prospekt in Petrozavodsk --Florstein 09:04, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Oppose Sorry: level of detail is too low   Level of detail too low and blurry. --F. Riedelio 14:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
    ** I don't see posterization here. And I think the level of detail is okay. Let's ask for other opinions. --Florstein 05:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment It looks OK to me, except that I see what looks like blue COM:CA against the sky on the wire near the right margin. -- Ikan Kekek 18:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 11:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

File:20230518_Burgkapelle_St._Ägidius_Wasserburg_am_Inn.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View to the castle chapel St. Ägidius in Wasserburg am Inn --FlocciNivis 20:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Bottom crop is not well down --Michielverbeek 03:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Car is a minor object and crop near the wheel don't disturbe the chapel. --Mike1979 Russia 09:42, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Mike1979 --Jakubhal 04:00, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 11:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

File:VistaPuertoMadero1-sep2023.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination View of Puerto Madero, Buenos Aires, Argentina --Ezarate 23:18, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. Detail is borderline. --Tagooty 02:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose for now, as the tower on the right is notably leaning. Please apply a reasonable perspective correction. -- Ikan Kekek 18:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC) Ikan Kekek, see now, thanks!! --Ezarate 22:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment All I see that you did was to crop slightly and zoom in. You did not change any of the leaning. -- Ikan Kekek 08:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective. Also, the resolution and detail level are quite low.--Peulle 08:20, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Redone --Ezarate 23:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
What did you redo? The perspective is still way off. -- Ikan Kekek 05:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 11:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)