Question - Shouldn't this be "during an inversion"? I assume this is not the only time there ever was or ever will be an inversion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:23, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The scope is good, but File:Šimonka 012.jpg seems better because the mountains are more brightly lit. The fact that the Belianske Tatras are also visible in that shot doesn't make this one better in scope, in my opinion. Do you disagree? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:27, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This file File:Šimonka 012.jpg has been modified, contrast increased, is good... File Šimonka 017.jpg is original. I chose this image because the cloud to the right is so interesting and I think it's more useful to capture it with a camera. There can be more such shots than File:Šimonka 012.jpg, but like the cloud to the right (Šimonka 017.jpg), not anymore. --Milan Bališin (talk) 16:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For me it's a low dynamic cloud that moves fast (on the right side, cover Belianske Tatras) + view of the High Tatras, that is value. It's not so common to take pictures like this. This was not a peaceful inversion, but a rapidly changing condition. Scope is updated. --Milan Bališin (talk) 18:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Another thing is that those Tatras (100 kilometers away) are crystal clear. It was perfect visibility, which is not so common and also with inversion. The inversion (to be seen from the top of the peak above the clouds) in a mountain range that is 1100 meters above sea level is not as common as in mountains that have a much higher altitude than the Tatras, for example. The cloud (on the right side) comes to me like capturing a phenomenon, like photographing a rainbow and so on. Normally such a view does not occur. This was an exceptional situation. --Milan Bališin (talk) 17:02, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
