Commons:Valued image candidates/2014 Nysa, Rynek 22 08.JPG

2014 Nysa, Rynek 22 08.JPG

**declined**
Image
Nominated by	Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-06-27 11:57 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 22 Market Square in Nysa, window
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Oppose Sorry, but the scope is way too narrow imho. --El Grafo (talk) 17:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply] @El Grafo: I do not understand - after all, the narrower the scope the better. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:46, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply] @Jacek Halicki: From Commons:Valued_image_scope: Your chosen scope must be broad enough to be realistically useful to somebody who wishes to search the VI repository. What is so special about this window that somebody would actually search for it? Imho, that's about as useful as nominating File:Wilhelmine's eye.jpg in the scope Statue of Wilhelmine of Bayreuth, left eye. I know there's been a tendency towards narrower and narrower scopes lately. I'm willing to accept scopes like main entrance for buildings that are sufficiently notable to justify having their own scope, but I think we have to draw a line somewhere. Let's not degrade the meaning of the VI-seal by putting it on every image for which we can construct something that looks like a scope. --El Grafo (talk) 11:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply] @El Grafo: I withdrew the nomination earlier, but here I was discussing. It does not really matter that the window has an interesting stone border? --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:46, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply] @Jacek Halicki: Imo that's just an ordinary sandstone border, nothing really interesting about that. Maybe if it had some fancy ornaments or something like that … But of course I may be wrong, maybe other reviewers disagree → no need to withdraw! --El Grafo (talk) 15:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply] Oppose I agree with El Grafo here. Yann (talk) 19:32, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply] I withdraw my nomination --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]