weak support I took the liberty of linking the scope to the appropriate category (image is in the "focus stacking" sub-category). Identification of the fungus would be nice, but a) that's pretty much impossible for non-experts and b) the scope is for mouldy coffee in general, independent of the actual species of mould/fungus. --El Grafo (talk) 10:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Archaeodontosaurus: How does this differ from the mouldy nectarines used as an example in COM:VISC? There, Mouldy nectarines is explicitly proposed as a suitable scope in the section "Not too narrow...". I realize that things may have changed since that was written, but as long as that example hasn't been replaced by something else we just can not oppose this scope. --El Grafo (talk) 15:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia has changed since birth. In 2005 article for the genus Morpho was a line: "The morpho is a blue butterfly." Today we have species and subspecies. We must raise the level, but especially not lower it. More a scope is accurate, least we will have a problem. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
