Commons:Valued image candidates/8 Marine Crescent, Waterloo.jpg

8 Marine Crescent, Waterloo.jpg

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-07-13 09:54 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Marine Crescent, Waterloo - No. 8
Used in	Global usage Wikidata:Q26548852
Review (criteria)	Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] Opposechimneys croppedCharlesjsharp (talk) 08:38, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] Comment I've been there now about ~~six~~ seven times. I've moved on. Please tell us why a very minor failing really matters in VI rather than QI? Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:47, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] @Archaeodontosaurus and Charlesjsharp: Reshot without crop. Of course, you don't get the sunshine and nice blue sky, but some might think that's an acceptable trade-off for 2cm of poorly-glazed, mass-produced chimney pot of little or no architectural merit. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:14, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] No problem for me, I only regret the blue sky which is unusual for this region ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:33, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] I have had VICs rejected where a tiny part of an animal tail is missing. A new image would usually be a new nomination.Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:57, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] Comment If a reshoot is substantially the same scene, but better, I think COM:OVERWRITE is unduly prescriptive and am prepared to go with William of Occam and keep things simple. `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)`[reply]