Review (criteria )
Neutral It looks great at full size, but at taxobox size it's difficult to see the bird. A cropped version would be more useful.--Pere prlpz (talk ) 09:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Unfortunate background, it is difficult to see the bird. --Eusebius (talk ) 20:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Comment I have no problem seeing the bird at taxobox size, but that's probably because I do 20-30 hours of birdwatching per week.--oskila (talk ) 21:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Have to say I disagree with the opposers. It's a fine picture. --MichaelMaggs (talk ) 19:08, 21 September 2008 (UTC) Supporting cropped version. --MichaelMaggs (talk ) 06:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose I agree it is a fine picture, but for online content and at VI review size, I find a cropped version better (such that the subject fills a larger fraction of the image area). I have therefore uploaded Image:Anthus godlewskii cropped.jpg and moved this nomination to MVR to let it compete with Commons:Valued image candidates/Anthus godlewskii cropped.jpg . -- Slaunger (talk ) 22:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
MVR scores:
Commons:Valued image candidates/Anthus godlewskii.jpg : -2 <--
Commons:Valued image candidates/Anthus godlewskii cropped.jpg : +3
Result:
Image:Anthus godlewskii.jpg : Declined <--
Image:Anthus godlewskii cropped.jpg : Promoted
-- Slaunger (talk ) 10:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]