Commons:Valued image candidates/DaVinci MonaLisa1b.jpg

Image:DaVinci MonaLisa1b.jpg

**undecided**
Image
Nominated by	Loadmaster on 2008-06-01 15:13 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Comparison of Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa and his self-portait
Used in	Global usage w:Speculation about Mona Lisa, w:Lillian Schwartz
Review (criteria)	Comment Scope isn't very clear. What actual topic is it illustrating? Adam Cuerden 00:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] It's illustrating the subject's suggested resemblance to the artist (hence the "self-portrait" part). There's more to it, of course. Rocket000 10:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] Oppose Scope is a description of a user-created image, and fails criterion 2. --MichaelMaggs 06:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] Support Scope clear as in article. Image has name of scope and article. Would be interesting to have a right version of the same setup. --Foroa 15:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] ~~Support~~ I tend to agree with Foroa, although I am wondering if the scope could be adjusted to something slightly more concise and self-explanatory like "Speculation about Mona Lisa being a self portrait". I think the image is quite convincing at illustrating that speculation. -- Slaunger 22:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] Comment I changed the scope slightly, adding "comparison" to make it a little clearer. --Loadmaster 00:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] OK, in that case you should use the {{VIC-scope-change}} template and contact the voters so far, see #Changes in scope during the review period. I have added the template, but not contacted the reviewers. -- Slaunger 06:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] Scope changed from Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa and self-portait to Comparison of Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa and his self-portait {{{3}}} Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". Support Reconfirming my vote. -- Slaunger 06:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] Oppose Scope is still a description of a user-created image, not a generic field, and in my view fails criterion 2. --MichaelMaggs 17:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] What would you suggest? — Loadmaster 23:18, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] It's hard to say, but I think that getting a clear description of the speculation about the Mona Lisa and Leonardo di Vinci is the necessary first step. Adam Cuerden 03:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] I am afraid I can't think of any suitable scope for this image, sorry. --MichaelMaggs 19:06, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] Comment How about changing the scope to "Speculation about Mona Lisa"? --Calibas 20:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 1 oppose => Undecided. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]