Review (criteria) |
Thank you for the review and for the comment. May I please ask you, if you prefer crop or original or nominating the one that you suggested? Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- An MVR can be set up if it is needed, but:
- Between this one and the crop, I'd favour a crop (subject is too tiny here);
- Between this one (cropped) and the other, I don't know: which side is more relevant, and why? --Eusebius (talk) 14:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. I took another look and I believe now that the one you suggested is better because in the nominated image part of the building is behind the trees. May I please ask you how I should proceed, just to change the image in this existing nomination or create a new one (Sorry, I probably should have known this myself, but I do not)? --Mbz1 (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I suggest you put all the images in competition in a most valuable review (MVR). Nominate them all (invididually), give them a "discussed" status, add an entry in this page (there is an example in the source code) and remove this entry from the main list. --Eusebius (talk) 14:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Scores:
1. Dartington hall.jpg: 0
2. Main Hall entrance Dartington.jpg: +1
=>
File:Dartington hall.jpg: Declined.
File:Main Hall entrance Dartington.jpg: Promoted.
--Eusebius (talk) 06:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|