Comment The format of the nomination isn't standard, but the bigger problem is that it's usually not possible or really that reasonable to have a Valued Image of a concept, and I don't see any good reason to select a particular image to represent geothermal power in general. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CommentIkan Kekek,A1Cafel I can't really understand that the format is not within Valued_image_criteria just because it is not "standard" (if there even was one). It is an illustration that describes how a "Hot Water Geothermal" works and that is well with in all the criteria. What I do think is that maybe the scope is not the correct one, maybe it should be more narrow but I could not find a more narrow article in wikipedia. --always ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 18:26, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment (1) Look at the format of any other nomination on this page in edit mode. Scopes are never linked to Wikipedia, but instead, to an appropriate Commons category. (2) You're focusing on something incidental which is not the reason this can't be a VI in the given scope. The reason it can't be a VI in this scope is that the scope is a concept that can't logically have a best image to illustrate it. (3) Is there a scope in which this is the best image on Commons? Make sure you check all other images in scope and link to a category that includes all those images, but the scope does not have to be the name of the Commons category verbatim. Read Commons:Valued image scope for some ideas. Start a thread at Commons talk:Valued image scope if you'd like to discuss this further. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:00, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
