Oppose Lacks information about the underlying work (architecture) such as PD rationale, year of construction, and architect/builder if known (or indication of unknown). cmadler (talk) 14:24, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing on the image description page -- text, categories, or parent categories -- indicates that it dates from the Middle Ages. Also, the architect/builder should be indicated if known, or otherwise "unknown" should be given. Without these items, I find this to fail VI criterion 4 ("fully described on the image page") and possibly 6 ("well categorized at an appropriate level"). cmadler (talk) 16:27, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with your proposal to see captions better. And I urge our friend to add at least the date (it is contained in the banner of the classification of historic monuments). But I do not apourve negative vote. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
