Commons:Valued image candidates/ElizabethanProstheticArm.jpg

ElizabethanProstheticArm.jpg

**declined**
Image
Nominated by	Martinvl (talk) on 2019-10-26 17:03 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: 16th-century prosthetic arm at Cotehele House
Used in	Global usage de:Prothese de:Liste Eiserner Hände nl:Armprothese Alamy images (commercial)
Reason	I have modified the scope as suggested. Also, given that Alamy is potentially making money out of this image and I am not getting any of it, I would like to promote the free version of it. -- Martinvl (talk)
Review (criteria)	Previous reviews Oppose scope linked to a redirected category, must be linked to specific category and why is best in scope? Ezarateesteban 15:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply] Scope changed from '16th-century prosthetic arm at Cotehele House' to '16th-century prosthetic arm at Cotehele House -- Martinvl (talk) 18:18, 3 November 2019 (UTC) {{{3}}}[reply] Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". @Ezarate: I have changed the scope so that it now maps directly on the catgory. If you look at the prosthetic arms as per the scope, there are two other candidates that are more than 200 years old - this one and a different view of the image that I have put up for consideration (also taken by me). I believe that this is the best image of the three (also one of them is not at Cotehele house as per the scope). -- Martinvl (talk) 18:18, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 4 November 2019 (UTC)`[reply]