Info I almost made this a MVR because there's an edited version that may be considered a contender. It's actually used more across the wikis. I think this is because, even though it's much lower quality, the brighter colors and smaller size make it clearer as a thumbnail. (IMO, the colors are wrong.) At full screen, it's no contest. The higher resolution is important (more so than normally) with this painting because sections of it are commonly cropped out to illustrate certain details. Rocket000 (talk) 01:28, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree that it is the best representation we have of the inside. It is a major work of a major artist, so the scope is obviously ok. I wonder whether we should include the exterior view and make it a VI set? It's part of the painting as well. Also, should we geolocate the work in the museum (or in hell)? --Eusebius (talk) 13:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The outside view is not of the same quality, so i'm not sure about making a set. Geolocating of the museum would not be helpfull imo. --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'm not sure if I am supporting this version or the painting itself... Wonderful and disturbing picture. A shame we don't have a higher resolution, it would be a great FP candidate. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we should make that a rule then for consistency. We already have Vitruvian Man and 36 views of Mount Fuji, but then we also have Shakespeare's Taming of the Shrew. Rocket000 (talk) 02:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=link}
