Commons:Valued image candidates/Grosshesseloher Brücke R B.jpg

Grosshesseloher Brücke R B.jpg

**declined**
Image
Nominated by	Richard Bartz (talk) on 2009-03-28 22:46 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Großhesseloher Brücke
Used in	Global usage ~~de:Großhesseloher Brücke~~
Review (criteria)	Backgroundinformation: At the opening in 1857 this bridge was the 2nd highest railroad bridge in the world. Richard Bartz (talk) 19:56, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply] Request It is the camera location you should geocode, and for these types of photos it is also very helpful to add a heading to the geodata. It gives this cool pointer on GM/GE. The difference between object and camera location is irrelevant for your usual subjects, but this is different;-) --Slaunger (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply] Done --Richard Bartz (talk) 10:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] ~~Support~~ Pedantic as I can sometimes be, I adjusted the heading a little . Fulfills all criteria. It adds considerable to the value that you have managed to capture a traint right in the middle of the bridge. Very nice. I also found this historic photo from before 1900 quite valuable and interesting for historic reasons, but I tend to favour the nominated image. --Slaunger (talk) 19:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Vote changed after MVR opened. --Slaunger (talk) 11:15, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] Well, pedantism ? I'am in I think we should raise the value of the picture a bit more, how ? I found out that 2 different trainlines crossing the bridge, so I went to this place in the morning and waited for them. Should I withdraw in favour to the new picture ? --Richard Bartz (talk) 15:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] More quality, bigger size & all possibilities (trains, pedestrians, bikers and the little diner which sells Weißwurst and Wiener on the very left side) Comment I like that attitude ! Well the most natural thing would be for you, the nominator and creator of both images to open an MVR where the two images compete. --Slaunger (talk) 21:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] OK, done --Richard Bartz (talk) 21:47, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] Neutral OK, I still think this is a good candidate, but the other candidate in this MVR is slightly better because there are two trains there. --Slaunger (talk) 11:15, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Grosshesseloher Brücke R B.jpg: 0 2. Grosshesseloher Bruecke.jpg: +2 => File:Grosshesseloher Brücke R B.jpg: Declined. File:Grosshesseloher Bruecke.jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 11:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]