Commons:Кандидаты в ценные изображения/Шапка
Это кандидаты на статус ценных изображений. Пожалуйста, обратите внимание, что это не то же самое, что Избранные изображения или Качественные изображения. Если вам просто хочется получить отзывы о своих фотографиях, вы можете запросить их на странице фотокритики. На статус «ценных» (valued image, VI) номинируются одиночные изображения. В качестве кандидатов предлагаются наиболее ценные из всех изображений Викисклада, в определённых рамках. Оценка и присвоение стат уса производится согласно определённым критериям. Отбор наиболее ценных (Most Valued Review, MVR) открывается, если есть два или более кандидата, конкурирующих, по сути, в пределах одной и той же [[Commons::Valued image scope]]. Правила продвижения можно найти на странице Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules/ru. Изображение, которое ранее было отклонено, может быть повторно номинировано в той же тематической области только в том случае, если были устранены проблемы, приведшие к первоначальному отклонению. Ранее номинированные изображения, которые были закрыты как «нерешённые», могут быть повторно номинированы в любое время. Изображения, получившие статус VI или VIS, как правило, могут потерять этот статус, только если в рамках «Отбора наиболее ценных» их заменит какой-нибудь более выигрышный кандидат. Чтобы номинировать изображение на статус «ценного» (VI), нужно следовать нижеприведённым инструкциям. Если вы предлагаете лучшего кандидата в рамках, по сути, той же тематической области, что и изображение, уже имеющее статус VI, пожалуйста, откройте обсуждение в рамках «Отбора наиболее ценных». | ||||||||||||||||||||||
How to nominate an image for VI statusNominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Признаки ценных иллюстраций. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review. Adding a new nomination (image)Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button. Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage. Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:
so that it looks like this: {{VICs ... |My-image-filename.jpg }} and save the candidate list. RenominationDeclined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review. Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination. Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination. Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in |date={{subst:VI-time}} Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review). Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with |nominator=~~~ Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.
|review= {{subst:VIC-archive}} }}
Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list. How to open a Most Valued ReviewThere must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: === Scope === {{VICs |candidate1.jpg |candidate2.jpg }} where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR. The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.
Как оценивать кандидатовHow to review an imageAny registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it). Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Признаки ценных иллюстраций. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.
Review procedure
Changes in scope during the review periodThe nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn. |