IMO it is very interesting and educational image with high EV. I found it by a pure accident, and was rather surprised that Vandals not necessarily means vandals :) -- Mbz1 (talk)
Question It is a beautiful necklace and a good photograph, but how can one see that it is art specific for the vandal tribe and not another tribe? It is not clear to me from skimming the article on en. --Slaunger (talk) 18:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A photograph was taken in museum. I assume the identification of the tribe, that made the necklace was made by scientists. --Mbz1 (talk) 20:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, yeah, and they may have deduced that it is Vandal when seen in context of the place it was found, and other items found there. My point is that the image itself should be Vandal-specific and I am wondering if it could be identified as such from the image alone (I do not know). Like could it be from a neighbouring tribe in the same time period, or from the same location only earlier or later than the Vandals? --Slaunger (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]