Commons:Valued image candidates/Katedralskolen viborg 2009-04-19.jpg/Archive of previous reviews

•  Support OK with me. May I please suggest to add the image to en:Viborg, Denmark#Education? It looks like this is Denmark's oldest educational institution.--Mbz1 (talk) 20:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the relevant advice. I have added it to the article in that section as suggested. --Slaunger (talk) 21:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Info I added a link to en:Viborg, Denmark in the scope, fixed a link in used in and moved the review to the reviews parameter. --Slaunger (talk) 21:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Info Don't know why I did not notice that before, but there is an en:Viborg Katedralskole, so I have changed the link in the scope to refer to that article. --Slaunger (talk) 22:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment There's also a Commons category for it, therefore according to the guideline change you've initiated yourself, I took the liberty to modify the link in the scope... --Eusebius (talk) 09:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Thank you, Eusebius for reminding me of guidelines I have helped craft;-) I did indeed create Category:Viborg Katedralskole along the way in this review. I did that as I also added two other photos to the category, that I took on the same day, one of a facade and one of the main entrance. These were not there when Mila reviewed the VIC, so in all fairness I think I should mention that although I personally consider these less good illustrations of the scope. --Slaunger (talk) 13:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 11:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)