Commons:Valued image candidates/Kiruna kyrka September 2017 04.jpg

Kiruna kyrka September 2017 04.jpg

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	—Percival Kestreltail (talk) on 2020-04-13 03:17 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Aerial view of Kiruna Church
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment - It seems to me, the most accurate scope for this would include the phrase "view(ed) from above". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment I felt that this picture was better than other, ground-level views of the exterior, so that's why I used the more general scope. I will wait to hear others' opinions. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment Your scope has to mention the view direction anyway. --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment @Ikan Kekek and Palauenc05: Okay then, I changed the scope. Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:06, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment Sorry, but your new scope is a pleonasm. An interior aerial view is hardly possible, unless the building is made of glass. --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment That is quite true, but the tone of your message somehow makes me unwilling to modify the scope. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment Someone who tells others to have their eyes checked, needn't tell me anything about the tone of a comment. --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment I have no desire to revisit a nomination from weeks ago, but I do believe I was responding appropriately to your comment of "Are you kidding?", which I considered to be rather crass given the friendly tone of my previous message. Unfortunately, I still don't feel like changing the scope; maybe I will do so later this week. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment @Ikan Kekek and Palauenc05: I decided to change the scope! —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Support - It's fine. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:22, 19 April 2020 (UTC)`[reply]