I think that this photograph is a valuable depiction of a laser light show. I put it in competition with the second and third candidate. -- Grand-Duc (talk)
Comment These kind of competitions, as a rule, are placed in the section below called a MVR (Most Valued Reviews). Could you please move all the nominations within the scope there? I can do it for you if you experience some difficulties. --MrPanyGoff18:56, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, I would like to suggest more accurate scope because now it is too broad. I calculated more than a hundred images in this category and its subcategories. It will be very hard for the reviewers to assess the photos.--MrPanyGoff19:08, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'll change that (beforehand, I misunderstood somehow the rules, thought that there must be already a VI in the scope for a competition...). As for the scope: here, it is only for laser light shows, not for images depicting e.g. a symphony of lights (I guess that there are other light sources than lasers in this kind of "symphonical" shows) or the Klangwelle Bonn, so, when assessing my candidates, there are only 37 and not a three-digit number of images to compare. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 19:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The scope seems OK to me (however, at the singular would be better IMO; the VI will be the most illustrative example of what a laser light show is). Some previous case occured where an image has been assessed despite bunchs of images to look over : ewamples 1 or 2. It's demanding for reviewers but not impossible. --Myrabella (talk) 19:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I simply took the name of the category for the scope... Is there any need of changing the title of the wikilink or to put a cat rename request at the cat discussion? Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I tend to prefer that one, where the rays are less fuzzy : File:Vizual pokazy laserowe 1.jpg. It can be geocoded I guess: I found that image on the website of the performer too, in the section "Andrzejki w Klubie APOLLO" of that page. Side info (to other reviewers): note that "It is perfectly possible to oppose a nomination on the grounds that another Commons image is 'more valuable', even if that image could not itself be a VI candidate (eg because it is not geocoded)", seeCommons:Valued image value. --Myrabella (talk) 21:11, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
