Comment Not the best one in scope. Similar to other pics. But better quality has: "Flickr - archer10 (Dennis) - Egypt-12B-008.jpg". Sorry. Halavar (talk) 10:23, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Quality of File:Flickr - archer10 (Dennis) - Egypt-12B-008.jpg is surely worse, it is oversharpend and has heavy noise. --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:29, 1 October 2013 (UTC) Oppose Your picture is blurred and colors are pale. Also the angle in this image is not qualify to be the best image in scope. On mentioned by me image angle was better. In this image GD-EG-Memphis004.JPG also. That image is used in Wikipedia articles. Sorry. I think that your image is not the best in scope. Halavar (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Berthold about the first picture mentionned by Halavar. As for the second one (GD-EG-Memphis004.JPG), its sky is obviously blown out... But other opinions are admitted. --JLPC (talk) 10:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC) Comment JLPC and Archaeodontosaurus - this image don't need a caption in English?? Please again, remember what it is said in: Commons:Valued image criteria. And about image - I think that horizontal layout is a better option to show Sphinx. And those 2 images mentioned by me had that angle. Halavar (talk) 10:56, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]