Commons:Valued image candidates/Papaver somniferum

Papaver somniferum

**promoted** to Valued image set: Papaver somniferum
Images	bud flower fruit leaves
Description	images by Alvesgaspar (talk)
Nominated by	Ikar.us (talk) on 2010-04-09 23:05 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued set of images on Wikimedia Commons within the scope: Papaver somniferum (Opium Poppy)
Review (criteria)	Oppose - None is geocoded! why? --Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 17:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Comment - The nominator was not the author. This one has been asked for geocoding. This oppose seems to be too early. Let's be patient ! ----Jebulon (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Info - There are larger versions of the three images: File:Papaver April 2010-8a.jpg, File:Papaver April 2010-3.jpg and File:Papaver_April_2010-9.jpg. All are geocoded. Also, maybe a fourth image, with the leaves, could be added to the set: File:Papaver April 2010-6.jpg -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Thank you, but - only the bud is larger. The fruit is the same but few pixels, and the flower is much smaller!? --Ikar.us (talk) 22:47, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] I think that we can let Alvesgaspar choose the images of the set; he is the creator, after all ;-) --Myrabella (talk) 08:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] General rule for redundant images is to sppedily delete smaller duplicates. So the largest one should be VI. --Ikar.us (talk) 08:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] InfoNominated the highest quality version of all images, marked lower quality versions as duplicate. --Ikar.us (talk) 13:42, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Support - Now that everything is fixed, I support. That is why my oppose was not too early - Votes can be changed easily! --Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 17:48, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 06:56, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]