Commons:Valued image candidates/Parapente - 174.jpg

Parapente - 174.jpg

undecided
Image  
Nominated by Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2015-11-09 13:28 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paragliding, Inflation sailing
Used in Global usage
Review
(criteria)

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  Oppose Many better images of paragliding. Expression "Inflation sailing" is weird. Charles (talk) 11:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ask about paragliding before challenging for such a basic pattern.
You oppose the majority of my images that are validated by others. For a lot of them, it is hardly justified. If you persist, I would do a report for these facts. This is clearly a harassment. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I oppose your QI candidate images, because in my opinion that are not QI, so feel free to ask any third party to investigate. I normally only oppose your wildlife images, but I noticed the expression "Inflation sailing" which intrigued me. I said Inflation sailing is weird as there is only one record on Google - your image. Charles (talk) 23:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Medium69: : I notice that English is not your mother tongue, so please explain the term "inflation sailing" in French. Once you have done this and a native-English speaker has translated your comments into English, it is possible that the problems might be cleared up. Martinvl (talk) 14:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Effectivement je suis mauvais en anglais ; ce que je veux dire est « gonflage de la voile ». Merci de votre compréhension. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 14:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In English, it's a known as a 'reverse launch'. But William has linked his scope of Paragliding to a different category - Paragliding near Puy de Dôme, which would probably not justify a separate scope. Under the scope of Paragliding there are relevant sub-categories and many better images. Charles (talk) 16:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
[reply]