Commons:Valued image candidates/Théâtre Graslin - Place Graslin, Nantes.jpg

Théâtre Graslin - Place Graslin, Nantes.jpg

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	MrPanyGoff on 2012-07-10 06:42 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Théâtre Graslin, Nantes (exterior)
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Previous reviews Comment Again doubled VI. I open a MVR for seven days from now on (according to the rules).--MrPanyGoff 06:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] Support I think this one is better. cmadler (talk) 14:14, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] Support Me too.--Paris 16 (talk) 19:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] I think that the nominator should not vote for his nomination.--MrPanyGoff 20:26, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] I am only former nominator.--Paris 16 (talk) 21:47, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] Comment I think we need more votes in this MVR. It can't finish undecided. One of the competitors must be removed.--MrPanyGoff 10:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] I agree that this can't close undecided. Would you care to vote? cmadler (talk) 13:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] I can't decide which one is better. Finally, I suppose we should demote the new candidate as not being nominated in accordance with the rules, meaning via MVR.--MrPanyGoff 20:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] Support I think the lightning condition are a little better here, and for me it "wins" over the fact that a bit more of the roof is seen in the alternative. --Slaunger (talk) 06:20, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Théâtre Graslin (retouch).jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Théâtre Graslin - Place Graslin, Nantes.jpg: +3 => File:Théâtre Graslin (retouch).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Théâtre Graslin - Place Graslin, Nantes.jpg: Promoted. --MrPanyGoff 16:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]