Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Valued image candidates/Ubility.jpg

< Commons:Valued image candidates

Ubility.jpg

undecided
Image  
Nominated by Kersti (talk) on 2009-03-19 00:03 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
KWPN (Dutch Warmblood, Niederländisches Warmblut)
Used in

Global usage

de:KWPN, de:Liste der Pferderassen
Review
(criteria)
  •   Info Reason for nomination:
In de:Wikipedia Diskussion:Formatvorlage Pferderasse#Erläuterung zum Bild in der Rassebox is specified how the horse of an infobox-photo should stand for german Wikipedia. That is the Pose used for selling horses in catalogues, because it ist optimal for judging the quality of a horse.
  • photographed exactly from the side
  • Legs: The legs which are nearer to the Photographer schould be moved front for the front leg and back for the hindleg. (Open to onlooker)
  • The background should be quiet and of a different colour compared to the horse
  • The horse should stand with head up and looking forward
Additionally it should be a typical example for a grown up horse of the breed.
The Horse on the Photo stands the right way and I think the Quality is OK. --Kersti (talk) 00:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Riding horse
  • Harness horse
  • Gelder horse
See here
In a KWPN-Article it would be nice to have a photo for every type. And there are two possibilities to do this. Ubility is of Riding type and on this Photo used for dressage. One possibility to illustrate a KWPN-Artikle would be this. --Kersti (talk) 18:18, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  
    infobox-photo
  •  
    Example for riding horse used as sport horse
  •  
    (Alternativeliy this photo may be used as Example for riding horse used as sport horse)
  •  
    Example for harness horse used as harness horse
  •  
    Example for Gelder horse
  •   Comment I really think that only an infobox-like picture (and not all the pictures used in an article) should be the VI for the scope (and this picture is a good candidate indeed). I don't support because it is impossible to review as soon as all the KWPN pictures are not properly categorized. --Eusebius (talk) 07:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Slaunger (talk) 19:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Ubility.jpg&oldid=404787123"