Commons:Valued image candidates/Yellowcake (03010301).jpg

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	Yann (talk) on 2017-02-18 21:34 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Yellowcake
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:14, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply] Comment scope is too broad - see description on File:Uranium conversion 2.jpg. Charles (talk) 10:49, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply] According to the source, this is "Yellowcake", so why is it not appropriate for the scope of "Yellowcake"? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:05, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply] It may be, but I assumed from File:Uranium conversion 2.jpg that yellowcake covered many different compounds. Perhaps they all look the same. I'm not opposing, just checking we have best scope. Charles (talk) 13:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply] It does contain different compounds, as per w:Yellowcake: "Typically, yellowcakes are obtained through the milling and chemical processing of uranium ore forming a coarse powder that has a pungent odor, is insoluble in water, and contains about 80% uranium oxide[...]The compounds identified in yellowcakes include uranyl hydroxide, uranyl sulfate, sodium para-uranate, and uranyl peroxide, along with various uranium oxides. Modern yellowcake typically contains 70% to 90% triuranium octoxide (U3O8) by weight." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)`[reply]