User:ComputerHotline/Archive 3

Scale bar

Hi! Just being curious why you think that the scale bar in File:Plan-fort-roppe-fr-FR.svg is correct. Usually (in fact in all instances I remember) scale bars are divided in equal intervals. In this case for instance one could have three intervals corresponding to 50 m each. In the plan, what length do the black and white bars in the scale bar have? bamse (talk) 17:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Because it's the real scale. I measured it.--ComputerHotline (talk) 05:23, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Hm, not sure we understand each other. I just wondered why you have split the 150 m in three intervals of about 46.5 metres and one interval of about 10.5 metres. Without a ruler it is impossible for the reader to know how long these intervals are. Why bother creating these intervals then? bamse (talk) 11:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

I don't know how to make it. --ComputerHotline (talk) 15:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2010-10-03 15-45-17-fort-roppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Albertus teolog 10:01, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Lepidoptera 5

This is Nessaea aglaura (Doubleday, 1848). Very nice photo, fortunately showing the orange patch on the hind wing. Many thanks for making it available.All the best from Ireland Robert aka Notafly (talk) 08:56, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Curious as to how you've handled commercial requests for your work

Hello,

I’m curious as to how you’ve dealt with commercial requests to use your work, as I am trying to get some ideas on how to handle these types of requests. I have received a few myself but have deferred to the licensing terms of the CC/GFDL and now realize that I have probably left some money on the table. For example, what has or hasn’t worked for you, what kind (s) of licensing do you use for, and what else you can think of that may be helpful. If you feel it’s more appropriate, we can continue this discussion via email. Thanks. BrokenSphere (Talk) 20:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Idea leuconoe 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice --George Chernilevsky 06:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egl thann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:12, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morpho peleides 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments To me, very good--Lmbuga 21:44, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agraulis vanillae 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:02, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papilio rumanzovia 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and good DOF--Lmbuga 20:39, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caligo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Like the macro, it's ok for me --Chris.urs-o 19:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Idea leuconoe 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Lmbuga 20:36, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Idea leuconoe 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good (perhaps, to me, very good)--Lmbuga 20:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14-07-59-fort-roppe-lp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think your documentation of the fortifications is important enough for a better description in the files. I think it would be very good to locate the objects you show on a plan of the fort. --Mbdortmund 10:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-18-19-f-roppe-lp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:26, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salbert-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, well lit. --Avenue 00:35, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Christmas image

Hi, I wonder why you chose File:14-33-29-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg for Picture of the day on December 24. It's just a tunnel, so it's got nothing to do with Christmas, or does it? Hekerui (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Only because it's a featured picture and this day hasn't got a POD at this time. --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:10, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Agraulis vanillae 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agraulis vanillae 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-40-45-ouv-g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 12:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12-53-36-f-lachaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough though a little darker would capture better the mood of the place, IMO -- Alvesgaspar 19:12, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:15-18-19-f-roppe-lp.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-18-19-f-roppe-lp.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 12-27-22-f-lachaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 20:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Morpho peleides 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Morpho peleides 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion File:15-02-21-f-giro.jpg

Bonjour, Thomas!
Excuse-moi de mon erreur FP.
Ta nomination FP est décorée, j'ai corrigé cela.
Très amical --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:27, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:15-02-21-f-giro.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-02-21-f-giro.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entree-mat-ouv-g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective, correctly exposed. --Daniel Case 07:13, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F-uxegney-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Also illustrates the diffraction og light.:-) --Cayambe 08:18, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ouv-g-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Pudelek 12:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F-uxegney-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good -- Felix Koenig 18:51, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ouv-g-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 10:55, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ouv-g-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:57, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F-uxegney-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks ok to me. --Cayambe 09:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

* * * :) * * *

Je vous félicite de Nativité du Christ et bonne année! Je vous souhaite les meilleurs voeux dans une Nouvelle année!
--George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:41, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F-uxegney-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments left side seems tilted / Distorted cw --Mbdortmund 18:14, 16 December 2010 (UTC)  Support I can't see any tilt; these are old walls. -- H005 17:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfort-Pano-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why not ?!--Jebulon 00:43, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfort-Pano-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good to me --Jebulon 00:45, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F-salbert-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 09:11, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Philaethria

Bonjour, je viens de placer une de vos photos pour illustrer l'infobox de ce genre, je voulais vous en informer. Bonne journée--Rosier (talk) 16:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vallee-brouillard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Soft focus, but otherwise ok. --Dschwen 20:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballon-alsace2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 19:12, 3 January 2011 (UTC) Info Statue by Mathurin Moreau. --Jebulon 15:22, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Belfort-Pano-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Belfort-Pano-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 8 January 2011 (UTC)