Владислав Резвый

Copyright status: File:Молодой молоканин.jpg

Copyright status: File:Молодой молоканин.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Молодой молоканин.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 15:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Renaming of A.Smirnova-Rosset by O.Kiprenskiy

Hi, wanted you to know that I've declined your request to move this file you proposed because the source mentions otherwise. Can you please provide a source to disprove that the person isn't Smirnova? Cheers, ƬheStrikeΣagle 16:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

• Hi, my source is the catalogue of Kiprensky's anniversary exhibitions: Орест Адамович Кипренский (1782-1836). К 200-летию со дня рождения. Каталог по материалам выставок в Ленинграде, Москве и Киеве (1982-1983). Т. 1: Живопись. Л., 1988. С. 207-209, № 67. As you can see, the attribution of the person as Smirnova-Rosset had been disproved more than 30 years ago. Cheers, Владислав Резвый (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Removing categories

Why are you removing valid categories from dozens of paintings? --EncycloPetey (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

On the contrary, I remove invalid categories. When a b/w reproduction of a painting is categorised as "Paintings of...", can you call that valid?-- Владислав Резвый (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes, it is an image of a painting by that person. All the images in the categories are digital; none of them are in paint, so none of them are paintings. --EncycloPetey (talk) 23:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Such kind of categories are valid, please do not move them anymore. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

If you say so.Владислав Резвый (talk) 08:50, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Removal of paintings. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

廣九直通車 (talk) 08:09, 11 February 2019 (UTC)