User talk:Лобачев Владимир/Archive 5

undo revision

HI there! As you can see all fantastic creatures from myths and legends are regrouped by name in category:legendary creatures (maybe we should create category:legendary creatures by name). Víla is also in Category:Creatures of Slavic mythology which stay in Category:Mythological creatures. Your modification creates a duplicate entry, since Víla is now twice in Category:Mythological creatures (directly and indirectly). Triton (talk) 10:26, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Pinus sylvestris growing on chalk soil

Hi Лобачев - the category Category:Pinus sylvestris growing on chalk soil still exists, as an ecological subcategory; the important point is that just because Pinus sylvestris sometimes grows on CaCO₃ soils does not make those trees a separate taxon, they are botanically the same as Pinus sylvestris growing on other soils. Hope this helps! - MPF (talk) 12:46, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

• There are different opinions. In Russian scientific literature this pine is called Pinus sylvestris var. cretacea. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 12:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

It is not accepted by any of the international standard authorities, and these are the ones used on Commons. If you want to use it on Russian wikipedia, that is OK, but it goes against the scientific evidence, that this 'variety' is not taxonomically distinct ;-) MPF (talk) 13:15, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

The views are different. This subspecies grows in Russia and is most studied by Russian botanists. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 13:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

You'll need to convince Kew, The Plant List, Tropicos, the Gymnosperm Database, and others of that; here is not the place for that. Send them the details of the morphological data that you consider supports its recognition. - MPF (talk) 13:43, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Some problems regarding your file

@Лобачев Владимир: It seems that your file had some mistakes. In the official versions of the coat of arms : [1], as well as in this, this, and this, clearly shows that the inscription was written as "Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь" rather than "Пролетарии всех стран, соединяйтесь!" (without the exclamation mark. I hope you can remove it.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 08:28, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

• OK. See File:Emblem of the Russian SFSR (1918-1920).svg. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 15:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Request

@Лобачев Владимир: Can you do this coat of arms? It is the emblem of the Turkestan ASSR. Maybe you can use the colours of this image.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 14:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

@Лобачев Владимир: Can you do this? The inscription is available at the site. The position of the text should be symmetrical, along with the star. See this for reference.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 11:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

• @Jeromi Mikhael: There is no such file. There is a redirect. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:14, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

  @Лобачев Владимир: What do you mean?--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 07:32, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

• I have no text in Abkhazian and no such fonts. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 07:28, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

@Лобачев Владимир: Added annotations to the image. Hope would help. --Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 23:53, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

See File:Emblem of the Abkhaz ASSR (1978–1992).svg. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 07:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

@Лобачев Владимир: Ummm....for the coat of arms....can you use the original colours and shapes as of this? The only difference should be in the inscriptions. It's ok if you don't want to. Just inform me and I'll do the work. --Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 07:12, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Here is a picture of the coat of arms in Great Soviet Encyclopedia. Here is another drawing from the official source (colors "dirty" – hammer and sickle should be gold). Here is another drawing. What colors are correct? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 07:45, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

But if you think it is necessary — you can change the colors. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 08:10, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Emblem of the Dagestan ASSR

@Лобачев Владимир: Can you do this emblem? The inscriptions are available as notes. Another variant of that is this emblem, which has 2 more banners. Inscriptions also available as notes. Thanks. Some of the inscriptions are incomplete, hope that you can help. If you can figure out the inscription, please put on this table.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 23:54, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Watermarks

Hi, you have undo some Watermarl tags in images that you have uploaded. This is a standard procedure. Watermarks should not be in the images and due they are uploaded under a free and open license, it's allowed to vanish the watermarks. So you're actions were a violation of our rules. Please accept them. Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

• @Marcus Cyron: These watermarked images are available on Commons. Files with the name of the species (plant or animal) in Russian are part of the photo album of the ecological village Korenskie rodniki, intended for use in Russian Wikipedia. This is part of a large environmental program for the study of nature in the area. On the basis of similar images without signatures it is possible to make photo albums of ecovillage in any language. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 07:14, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Misidentified photograph File:Жостер слабительный KR 01.JPG

• 
  your image
• 
  Cornus sanguinea
• 
  Rhamnus cathartica

Hi Лобачев Владимир/Archive 5, I do not know whether you understand this, because English is not one of the languages in your Babel box, but I am going to try anyway. Your image File:Жостер слабительный KR 01.JPG does not show Rhamnus cathartica, but a species of Cornus, almost certainly Cornus sanguinea. Cornus sanguinea is not supposed to grow in the wild in the area where the photograph was taken, however,at least not according to the old Flora Europaea. So this might be a garden escape or a cultivated plant. Anyway Rhamnus cathartica looks very different with its crenate leaves and with the very different arrangement of the fruits. So I changed the ID of your photograph tentatively to Cornus sanguinea. Your image should be renamed, however. Best regards, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 14:28, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

• I think you're right. This is Cornus sanguinea. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 18:05, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
• See map of the area. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 18:09, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Logo of Comecon

@Лобачев Владимир: Please help vectorize the logo of COMECON. Further discussion is available here. Other sources : [2], [3], and [4]. --Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 11:03, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

• See File:Logo of Comecon.jpg.svg. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:02, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
• @Лобачев Владимир: There is some mistake in the svg. Please fix it. --Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 05:02, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
  • See new version. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 06:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

@Лобачев Владимир: Can you help to vectorize this flag? Also, can you make a version of this, with punctuation mark? Further info can be seen here.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 07:41, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

• See File:Flag of the North Ossetian Autonomous Oblast.svg. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 13:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Coat of arms of Sofia

@Лобачев Владимир: Hey, can you vectorize this coat of arms? It is the coat of arms of Sofia from 1974 until 1991. It is a simpler version of the current coat of arms.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 16:02, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	Thank you for vectorizing the logo of COMECON! Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 04:58, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

New emblem of the Sakha Republic

@Лобачев Владимир: Per 2016, the Sakha Republic has changed its emblem. Please reflect this change in the svg file based on [5]. From "Республиката" to "Өрөспүүбүлүкэтэ". I don't know why they changed it, but Öröspüübülükete is better to pronounce than Respublikata.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 14:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Done. See File:New Coat of Arms of Sakha (Yakutia).svg. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 06:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
  • @Лобачев Владимир: Lobachev, that is not a good way to represent current changes of a coat of arms. I have made some fix in the your file and the original file. Take a look at Mari El. After changes occured on the coat of arms in 2011, instead of putting the new one on a new file, the creator decided to put the new one in the original file, and put the old one in a new file. Can you do shading in this?--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 07:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia-logo-v4-ru-xmas.png

File:Wikipedia-logo-v4-ru-xmas.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abiyoyo (talk) 11:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Official flag of the Soviet Air Force.svg

File:Official flag of the Soviet Air Force.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

95.67.31.70 17:07, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Seals_of_the_Grand_Duchy_of_Lithuania

Seals of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 19:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Symbols_of_the_Grand_Duchy_of_Lithuania

Symbols of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 20:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Seal of Catherine II of Russia.png

Copyright status: File:Seal of Catherine II of Russia.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Seal of Catherine II of Russia.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:National_costumes_of_Uzbekistan

National costumes of Uzbekistan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 05:18, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Please do not edit war

---

You currently appear to be participating in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.

--Yann (talk) 22:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania 1792.svg

File:Flag of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania 1792.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 14:19, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kauflahrtheiflagge 1858.png

Copyright status: File:Kauflahrtheiflagge 1858.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kauflahrtheiflagge 1858.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Ancient_Slavic_ceramics

Category:Ancient_Slavic_ceramics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Dronebogus (talk) 07:49, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 01.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 02.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 03.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 04.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 05.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:05, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 06.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:05, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 07.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:05, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 08.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:06, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 09.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:06, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 10.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 11.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 12.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 13.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 14.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 15.jpg

File:Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary 15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Ivan_Veretennikov._75th_anniversary

Ivan Veretennikov. 75th anniversary has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ke an (talk) 18:27, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 18:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Moldavian Automobile Club. Iasi. 1930.svg

File:Moldavian Automobile Club. Iasi. 1930.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IagoQnsi (talk) 00:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Chorągiew jazdy sprzed 1660 roku.jpg

File:Chorągiew jazdy sprzed 1660 roku.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 21:36, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Polski kawaleryjski sztandar.jpg

File:Polski kawaleryjski sztandar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 21:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Fragment-historycznej-choragwi-Ziemi-Leczyckiej-XVI.jpg

File:Fragment-historycznej-choragwi-Ziemi-Leczyckiej-XVI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 21:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Chorągiew województwa mazowieckiego XVIw.jpg

File:Chorągiew województwa mazowieckiego XVIw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 21:44, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Chorągiew województwa bełskiego XVI.jpg

File:Chorągiew województwa bełskiego XVI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 21:46, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 20:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Flag of Nowogrudek Voivodeship (1508-1795)-2.svg

File:Flag of Nowogrudek Voivodeship (1508-1795)-2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 20:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:185346-004-E7ED4DDA.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:185346-004-E7ED4DDA.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:185346-004-E7ED4DDA.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

--bjh21 (talk) 13:09, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Banners of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth of the 17th.jpg

File:Banners of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth of the 17th.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 21:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Banner of the militia of the Grodno powet of 1615.png

File:Banner of the militia of the Grodno powet of 1615.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Flag of Trakai Voivodeship (1569-1795)-1.svg

File:Flag of Trakai Voivodeship (1569-1795)-1.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 21:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Drapelul princiar model 1859, reconstituire.jpg

File:Drapelul princiar model 1859, reconstituire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Flag of Grodno powet (1413-1795).svg

File:Flag of Grodno powet (1413-1795).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 22:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Pofka (talk) 14:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)