Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Переславский музей-заповедник!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Kolotilina-l-n-2145-square.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kolotilina-l-n-2145-square.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kolotilina-l-n-2145-square.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sealle (talk) 09:41, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • @Sealle: Будьте добры, подскажите, каким способом музей должен подтвердить свои права на изображения, которые музей использует на своём сайте? Чем плох тот способ, который мы используем сейчас? Спасибо. --Переславский музей-заповедник (talk) 23:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
    • 1) Текст сообщения выше содержит недвусмысленное указание на универсальную процедуру подтверждения разрешений. Указание на некоем ресурсе свободной лицензии никак не поясняет, имеет ли этот ресурс право публиковать под этой лицензией работы конкретных авторов (см. COM:Отмывание лицензий). 2) По правилам проектов фонда Wikimedia запрещены имена учётных записей, совпадающие с наименованиями организаций и предприятий, а также те, редактирование с которых ведут несколько человек. Вы можете в любом из проектов подать запрос на глобальное переименование учётной записи (например, здесь), после которого блокировки могут быть сняты. Sealle (talk) 03:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
    • При согласии на переименование учётной записи можете указать желаемое новое имя прямо здесь. Не забудьте только прокомментировать, является ли эта учётка доступной для редактирования несколькими лицами. Sealle (talk) 03:35, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
      • Если написать в OTRS о том, что имеем право публиковать наши материалы на нашем сайте, это будет звучать как-то странно. Поэтому я прошу подсказку о том, каким вы видите подтверждение и кто именно должен его давать. Достаточно ли будет подтверждения от сотрудника, который ведёт редактирование?
      • Или надо сделать какое-то дополнительное утверждение на сайте? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Переславский музей-заповедник (talk • contribs) 09:22, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
      • Редактирование ведёт один человек. Очевидно, что если он будет уволен или умрёт, вместо него редактирование будет вести другой человек. Поэтому здесь мне нужен ваш совет. Какое новое имя участника вы можете посоветовать?
      • Спасибо. --Переславский музей-заповедник (talk) 09:11, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
        • Подтверждение должно поступить от всех авторов использованных фотографий, а не от сотрудника сайта. Форма указана на странице COM:OTRS/ru. Имя учётной записи выберите самостоятельно. Sealle (talk) 10:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
          • В нашем разговоре идёт речь не о сотруднике сайта, а о сотруднике музея. Музей получает права на изображения и передаёт эти права.
          • Вы разбираетесь в именах учётных записей, поэтому я прошу посоветовать имя учётной записи, которое будет устраивать всех. Уже выбранное имя учётной записи вы критикуете. Поэтому я и прошу подсказать мне, каким должно быть это имя. --Переславский музей-заповедник (talk) 10:39, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
            • Вы теряете время, пытаясь обсуждать здесь вопросы, подлежащие обсуждению в рамках OTRS и, судя по всему, путаете имущественные права с авторскими. Sealle (talk) 10:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
              • Выбор имени участника тоже надо обсуждать с OTRS? Пожалуйста, подскажите ссылку на правила, по которым надо выбирать имя участника.
              • Нынешнее имя не совпадает с названием организации. Организация называется так: государственное учреждение культуры Ярославской области «Переславль-Залесский государственный историко-архитектурный и художественный музей-заповедник». --Переславский музей-заповедник (talk) 15:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request edit

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "My account was blocked at Wikimedia Commons because of the unappropriate username. My username means «Pereslavl museum-preserve» because I work with Commons for my job duties (like a wikimedian in residence). I publish the media files and news articles with the name of my employer. From my point of view, the username does not advertise or promote any company, it is not disruptive and does not contain any personal attack, it is not linked to Wikimedia authority, it is not offensive. Moreover, it stays in line with other museum accounts (User:Kosmo-museum, User:Guggenheim Museum, User:RMR Museum, User:Museum für Kommunikation, Bern, User:BrooklynMuseum, User:History Museum Plovdiv, User:Finnish Museum of Photography, User:University Museum Utrecht, User:SourisValleyMuseum, et cetera.) For this reason I ask to unblock my account at Commons. --Переславский музей-заповедник (talk) 08:10, 28 February 2018 (UTC)"Reply
Unblock reason: "Unblocked per OTRS. ~riley (talk) 02:25, 15 March 2018 (UTC)"Reply
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  हिन्दी  македонски  русский  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

 
File:Сурнина Елена Михайловна 2018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:54, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:58, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Pn-syrkombinat-2006-3156.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:Pn-syrkombinat-2006-3156.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pn-syrkombinat-2006-3156.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply