Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Aa7778273!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−


Image Tagging Image:1931638244 81f9c9a73f.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:1931638244 81f9c9a73f.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 13:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:Xin_511004031037390284634.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Xin_511004031037390284634.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Sterkebaktalk 13:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Hualien City Montage.jpeg edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hualien City Montage.jpeg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:48, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
File:維基百科用戶:「aa7778273」個人照.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: License review NOT passed: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

請善用上傳精靈 edit

請多利用上傳精靈上傳自己拍攝的照片。--Solomon203 (talk) 10:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

好,謝謝您善意提醒喔! Aa7778273 (talk) 11:12, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

請提供照片中的統一超商門市名稱(自動門中央有貼)與地址,以利查證。--Solomon203 (talk) 13:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

上傳維基共享資源的檔案請注意著作權狀態 edit

與維基百科不同,維基共享資源不接受合理使用的照片,例如大部分商業網站裡的照片(網頁下方大多會標示©)。妳自己拍攝的藝人照片就沒這問題。請參考中文維基百科上的Wikipedia:合理使用。另外,維基共享資源是全球各地各種語言使用者共用的,所以維基共享資源管理員未必懂中文。--Solomon203 (talk) 05:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

受版權保護的圖文,在維基共享資源一經發現,隨時可能被提報刪除,這是維基共享資源管理員必須嚴格執行的政策。我非管理員,只能如此提醒。--Solomon203 (talk) 05:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:許瑋倫著作:《許瑋倫美麗七堂課》(2006).jpg edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:許瑋倫著作:《許瑋倫美麗七堂課》(2006).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:193縣道(北濱段).jpg edit

 
File:193縣道(北濱段).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

そらみみ (talk) 05:07, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
File:2019年因挪威選手而爆紅的埔鹽順澤宮.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

そらみみ (talk) 01:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:私立淡江大學文學院.JPG edit

 
File:私立淡江大學文學院.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

そらみみ (talk) 01:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:位於福田妙國內的蛋蛋妙居.jpg edit

Hi, Aa7778273. I noticed you uploaded File:位於福田妙國內的蛋蛋妙居.jpg, did you really shoot it by yourself? The file EXIF shows the date and time of data generation is "15 September 2007" and means that the photo was taken on 15 September 2007, why the date in the summary is "24 August 2019"?--Kai3952 (talk) 19:17, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

There is nothing to say to you guys. If you want to plant and fall, let's come over! I have a clear conscience! After all, this is just the dark side of the human nature. Beatrice Hsu is my favorite idol Everything I did was for her sake. If you want to continue to make trouble... I..... no objection... I have no opinion
雅婕留言05:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
先送閣下四個字:放馬過來
再多補上五個字:您周罵蛋哩
雅婕留言05:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

      • @雅婕: I'm entirely unsure why you are angry with me about, and I feel that you've very much misjudged me. I am here to ask you something: The file EXIF shows the date and time of data generation is "15 September 2007" and means that the photo was taken on 15 September 2007, why the date in the summary is "24 August 2019"?--Kai3952 (talk) 08:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:從花蓮港景觀橋眺望77高地.JPG edit

 
File:從花蓮港景觀橋眺望77高地.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Kai3952 (talk) 16:20, 7 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, TechyanTalk17:24, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:冷清的花蓮機場1F航廈.jpg edit

 
File:冷清的花蓮機場1F航廈.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Kai3952 (talk) 13:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:台南女子技術學院(南應大)經緯碑.JPG edit

 
File:台南女子技術學院(南應大)經緯碑.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Kai3952 (talk) 13:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


Please remain calm and collegial edit

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  עברית  +/−


 
It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

廣九直通車 (talk) 12:02, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

To: Direct trains in Kowloon and Guangzhou
I certainly understand what you mean.
At the same time, I try to communicate with them rationally.
But some editors’ style is really too stubborn.
It's hard not to be angry!
12:10, 16 November 2019雅婕留言— Preceding unsigned comment added by 雅婕 (talk • contribs) 12:12, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

我明白有時不被人理解的想法,而現在有人已經在COM:HD#File:位於福田妙國內的蛋蛋妙居.jpg進行討論,而您可以在相關討論中以中文或英文提出您的意見/困難。我不太清楚您和另一位用戶的關係,但如果您希望以中文溝通,有需要的話我會協助翻譯,謹此。廣九直通車 (talk) 11:53, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
@廣九直通車: I was just asking her why why the date in the summary is "24 August 2019", since I saw that the file EXIF shows the date and time of data generation is "15 September 2007". Why do you tell her: “不被人理解”?--Kai3952 (talk) 11:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
@廣九直通車: Could you explain why you said that?--Kai3952 (talk) 11:11, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Kai3952: 不好意思,遲了一點,其實是我當時覺得雅婕是誤會你想刪她的圖片(Hi, Aa7778273. ......, did you really shoot it by yourself?)。不論如何,也許我還應該花更多時間了解這件事情吧,不好意思。廣九直通車 (talk) 11:25, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
@廣九直通車: If you look at this diff you will see that I have not posted any of the information about Commons:Deletion requests. However, you said “不被人理解” and it really makes me feel like I did something to her so wrong. Do you think that I should not edit her photos, or I should not ask her when I notice a problem with her photo?--Kai3952 (talk) 14:04, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
File:哈瑪星文化園區內展示的早期火車頭.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Solomon203 (talk) 06:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

非常抱歉,這張照片太模糊,我必須提刪。希望您能重拍。--Solomon203 (talk) 06:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
雅婕留言)2020年5月23日 (六) 07:36 (UTC)

File:花蓮車站3樓商圈.jpg edit

 
File:花蓮車站3樓商圈.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 03:19, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:高雄之窗jpg.jpg was recently deleted edit

File:高雄之窗jpg.jpg was recently deleted by Billinghurst for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: CSD G6 (uncontroversial maintenance): double extensions

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:哈瑪星文化園區內展示的早期火車頭.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Solomon203 (talk) 11:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:國道一號南下155.5K處(大安溪橋).JPG edit

我剛才看到zh:許瑋倫條目有張貼「國道一號南下155.5K處(大安溪橋)」照片。如果你是為了報導車禍地點,你可以透過關係,向記者或電視台索取當時拍到車禍地點的照片,不過難度很高,但是比較有報導上價值,否則就只能選擇從當時報紙上或者google找到的照片擷取,如此一來就會受版權保護,不能上傳到這裡,但是具有報導上價值。我會這麼說,是因為「國道一號南下155.5K處(大安溪橋)」顯示只是路上奔馳的車子,對於這裡有很多外國人而言,他們的角度是只相信自己對HOST政策的判斷,所以他們看到的就是「out of the project scope」,然後就會提交刪除。原因是他們只看見路上奔馳的車子,路上奔馳的車子在世界各地是相當平常的景象,更何況周圍的環境是空蕩蕩,只有天空上陽光投射,所以當你說這是車禍地點,可能他們會質疑,為什麼照片沒顯示車禍,那麼你要解釋照片如何在教育上有用,我不知道他們看見照片有被zh:許瑋倫條目使用,能否被接受而保留下來,這就是我替你照片擔心的地方。--Kai3952 (talk) 17:48, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

此外,zh:許瑋倫條目在報導車禍似乎有問題,很多都沒有寫出來。比如說,她解開安全帶就剛好被後車追撞,導致她頭部受猛烈撞擊而重傷。這裡是整個車禍的關鍵,然而沒有人寫。這並不是沒有來源所造成,網路上搜索新聞就有一堆這樣的報導,不知道是不是有人寫過而後來被移除?--Kai3952 (talk) 18:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

嗯,謝謝你專程提醒我這件事,其實我對於瑋倫姐的離世一直很難過,所以我才會選擇參與編輯她的頁面,比方提供越多越完善的資料,增加讀者對她的了解,上傳那張照片的用意在於表述新聞報導中車禍的發生地,可以只是那個路段,讓閱讀者能大略了解就好。至於向報社索取,第一.那時候是深夜,天色太暗了,就算看到也分不清地理位置。第二.15年前的照片,他們可以早已銷毀,難以取得。沒辦法取得第一手照片,本編也很遺憾!
雅婕留言)2022年5月4日 (三) 01:18 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 雅婕 (talk • contribs) 01:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

第一,拍攝車禍場景目的是提供讀者看見當時原本撞擊的情況,所以不需要看清周圍的地理環境。第二,你看台視這個月適逢60周年台慶,節目中有播放他們開台時珍貴影像,這就是最好證明,所以新聞影像與照片不會因時間久遠而銷毀。不過,這些都僅止於建議。如果你不願意找記者索取車禍照片,我是沒差。此外,Youtube仍有很多影像播放許瑋倫上過的娛樂節目或訪問節目,只是當時沒有Youtube,所以現在能看到的影像會比較少。--Kai3952 (talk) 19:16, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply