User talk:1Veertje/Archive 1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Jebulon in topic UTC in QIC
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, IIVeaa!


File:Pedal pub.jpg edit

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


 
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Pedal pub.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA),   (CC0) and   (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

. Lymantria (talk) 17:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Catagory:Rijksmonumenten_in_Het_Westland edit

 
Catagory:Rijksmonumenten_in_Het_Westland has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vibhijain (talk) 06:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Movie theaters edit

Thanks for your message. Point taken. :-) Nightscream (talk) 23:49, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:OHM_logo.jpg edit

 
File:OHM_logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 14:19, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:297212-shoot-by-beatrice-cruveiller-fullscreen-1.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:297212-shoot-by-beatrice-cruveiller-fullscreen-1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:297212-shoot-by-beatrice-cruveiller-fullscreen-1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Giro720 (talk) 14:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! edit

... for this :-) Litlok (talk) 15:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

No problem :) --IIVeaa (talk) 15:53, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token eb7752773533a1beb1b105d37ca89227 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

 
File:Klaas Koelstra funeral.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

File:Klaas Koelstra funeral2.jpg edit

 
File:Klaas Koelstra funeral2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 07:15, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Klaas Koelstra funeral3.jpg edit

 
File:Klaas Koelstra funeral3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 07:15, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Belated thanks edit

Thanks for sorting out the yellowed images. You did a great job and it's much appreciated. --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:18, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome :) --Vera (talk) 08:54, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Duplicates" edit

Please take more care in tagging an image as a duplicate of another. You tagged File:Vincent van Gogh - Factories at Asnières, Seen from the Quai de Clichy.jpg as a duplicate of File:Van Gogh - Fabriken in Asnières, vom Quai de Clichy aus gesehen.jpeg. Yes, they both depict the same painting, but they are different photographs of it. This matters because the smaller, lower resolution file actually shows more of the painting. The larger one has the edges cropped off, while the smaller one appears to be a complete picture of the painting out of its frame. Look at the smokestack at the far right: in the larger image, it is bisected by the edge, while in the smaller image, the entire smokestack is present. Postdlf (talk) 03:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

ok --Vera (talk) 08:54, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Bafta_award_.jpg edit

 
File:Bafta_award_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bill william comptonTalk 23:25, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Troy_Davis.jpg edit

 
File:Troy_Davis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wehwalt (talk) 17:07, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuestes rhein panorama von mainz-cöln 1909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File:2011-09-28 Gouda 131.JPG edit

Hallo,

Zou je nog even kunnen kijken of File:2011-09-28 Gouda 131.JPG wel een monument is, en zo ja welke?

Mvg,

Bas

Dit is een deel van het voormalige Producent-concern aan de Wachtelstraat in Gouda, en wel het oostelijk gelegen deel van het complex (Rm517590). Evenals het centrale deel van het complex (Rm517589) is dit gebouw erkend als rijksmonument, het werk van nl:Pieter Dirk Stuurman. Gouwenaar (talk) 18:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
oh, hey, vergeten de lijst af te maken. jammer want nu heb ik 'm niet voor WLM kunnen insturen. --Vera (talk) 18:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

not art edit

Hallo IIVeaa, please be a bit careful when you remove art. ;) It still belong in the female breasts category. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

UTC in QIC edit

Hallo IIVeaa, I think you made a mistake when changing the date in QIC page. The time is UTC, so in "Commons" it is 22H30 when our clocks in Europe says that we are tomorrow, 0H30. I've removed your change, no problem. And please sign your nominations and messages with the four tilde, it is easy and it gives the "Commons" time ! Tot Ziens !--Jebulon (talk) 22:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Return to the user page of "1Veertje/Archive 1".