{{delete|reason=bad name|subpage=User_talk:A.Catalina|year=2011|month=February|day=6}}

@A.Catalina, why do you want this page (your above request) deleted? --Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, A.Catalina!

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, A.Catalina!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Turda_-_Statuia_lui_Avram_Iancu.jpg edit

 
File:Turda_-_Statuia_lui_Avram_Iancu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.62.198.234 18:05, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Ernest_Ratiu.jpg edit

 
File:Ernest_Ratiu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.103.132.181 19:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi A.Catalina,
who created this statue and/or when was it created/installed? --Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


The same for File:Teodor Murasanu.jpg, File:Turda - Statuia lui Avram Iancu.jpg, File:Statuie in incinta Spitalului Municipal..JPG, File:Statuie in incinta Spitalului Municipal.jpg, File:Bustul lui Mihai Eminescu (P-ta 1 Decembrie 1918).JPG, File:Statuia Sf.Florian din Bis.Romano-Catolica.jpg, File:Statuia Sf.Florian de pe Str.M.Eminescu.jpg, File:Statuia Lupoaicei - Romulus si Remus.JPG, File:Statuia Lupoaicei - Bazorelief al imparatului Traian.JPG, File:Statuia Lupoaicei.jpg, File:Monumentul Aviatorilor - 2009.09.06.jpg, [[:]]. --Túrelio (talk) 09:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Monumentul_Eroilor_din_1989.jpg edit

 
File:Monumentul_Eroilor_din_1989.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:Mormantul lui M.Viteazul.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mormantul lui M.Viteazul.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mormantul lui M.Viteazul.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Túrelio (talk) 09:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Ernest_si_Ion_Ratiu.jpg edit

 
File:Ernest_si_Ion_Ratiu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.124.106.36 14:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


@A.Catalina, in which year has File:2009 - DSC05618.JPG, File:2009-DSC04533.JPG, File:2009-DSC00711.JPG, File:2009-DSC06184.JPG, File:Monumentul Aviatorilor - 2009.09.06.jpg, File:Statuie in incinta Spitalului Municipal.jpg, File:Statuie in incinta Spitalului Municipal..JPG and File:Monumentul Aviatorilor.jpg been built? --Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

your uploads edit

Hi A.Catalina,
could you please choose descriptive filenames for your uploads, instead of meaningless string as "File:2010-IMG 1410.jpg". And instead of the wrong syntax "[[Category:[[Category:Turda]]]]" please enter "[[Category:Turda]]". --Túrelio (talk) 14:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dacia edit

Hey there! Seen some great images from you. Maybe you are interested in WikiProject Dacia, WikiProiectul Dacia and Dacia and Dacians. Best regards! --Codrin.B (talk) 20:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2009-DSC00711.JPG edit

 
File:2009-DSC00711.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2009-SPM_A4144.jpg edit

 
File:2009-SPM_A4144.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:44, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2009-SPM_A4142.jpg edit

 
File:2009-SPM_A4142.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:53, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2009-DSC09986.JPG edit

 
File:2009-DSC09986.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:57, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2010-IMG_1670.jpg edit

 
File:2010-IMG_1670.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 23:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2011-IMG_4758.jpg edit

 
File:2011-IMG_4758.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 23:03, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Mormantul_lui_M.Viteazul.jpg edit

 
File:Mormantul_lui_M.Viteazul.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 23:05, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Monumentul_Aviatorilor.jpg edit

 
File:Monumentul_Aviatorilor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 23:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Monumentul_Aviatorilor_-_2009.09.06.jpg edit

 
File:Monumentul_Aviatorilor_-_2009.09.06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 23:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2009_-_DSC05618.JPG edit

 
File:2009_-_DSC05618.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 23:14, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Discuţii edit

Scuzele mele în avans pentru româneşte strain meu.

Túrelio mi-a cerut să vă contacteze şi să vă solicite să răspundeţi la mai multe anunţuri pe pagina de discuţii dumneavoastră. De exemplu, aţi încărcat numeroase imagini de clădiri sau sculpturi care legea română consideră a avea drepturi de autor. Nu există nici o libertate de panoramă în România. (Cred ca asta este termenul român: în limba engleză este freedom of panorama, în limba germană Panoramafreiheit.) Vă rog, ar fi foarte util pentru tine de a răspunde cu privire la aceste aspecte diferite. Solicitarea de a avea şterse propria pagina de discuţii dvs. nu este cu adevărat un răspuns util.

Aveţi posibilitatea să răspundă în limba română sau în orice altă limbă este convenabil; cineva va traduce cu siguranţă, dacă este necesar. - Jmabel ! talk 06:07, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I renamed one of the images you uploaded edit

About six months ago someone added permission for me to move files. I moved File:2011- IMG 5552.jpg to File:2011- Biserica Evanghelica C.A (Str.Vasile Alecsndri nr.12).jpg because I thought it was a more descriptive name. I also added that image to Category:Churches in Cluj County.

Have you taken other images of Churches in Cluj County? If so you might consider adding them to that category.

Are there other images you have uploaded that you think it would be useful to place under a more descriptive name? If so, there is a tag, {{Rename}} that you can add to any images where you want to suggest the image be renamed.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 15:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Freedome of panorama edit

I have uploaded some images from Romania, that I found on flickr.com.

I was quite surprised when other contributors challenged them, saying they violated the rules for "freedom of panorama" in Romania. I found this quite counter-intuitive. I was told that in Romania the architect or designer of a building retains intellectual property rights to images of those buildings. I am unclear on these rules. But I thought I might give you a heads-up. As I understand it, an image that shows multiple buildings do not violate these rules. As I understand it, an image that shows an older building do not violate these rules because their intellectual property rights have expired.

I thought I would let you know, so you could anticipate similar challenges.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 15:45, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Geo Swan,
it is sort of normal (in copyright laws) that the architect of a building (provided it has some "creativity") and the sculptor of a sculpture/memorial also holds the rights to images of their work. As for buildings/works on public grounds, this right is largely taken away from the original artist in countries with a freedom of panorama (FOP) exemption/provision in their copyright law. However, some countries, such as France and Romania (and quite some others) don't have a FOP exemption, whereby we cannot host images of works, even if on public ground, if the artist isn't dead since >70 years. --Túrelio (talk) 14:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2010-IMG 8648.jpg edit

Hi A.Catalina, when was the monument, shown in this image, installed and by whom (sculptor)? --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Avram Iancu lived from 1824 to 1872. Yes, I know that the date the sculptor died is the key date. Geo Swan (talk) 00:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
The statue was erected in 1998. The next four ones are part of a monument by János Fadrusz.—Andrei S. Talk 14:08, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. The statue in File:2011-IMG 4694.jpg is also by János Fadrusz? --Túrelio (talk) 14:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
No. That's a 1929 work by en:Cornel Medrea, who died in 1964.—Andrei S. Talk 08:27, 18 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I've speedy-tagged the image as derivative. --Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2011-IMG 5030.jpg edit

Hi A.Catalina, when was the monument, shown in this image, installed and by whom (sculptor)? --Túrelio (talk) 06:39, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

According to the uploader's description template this sculpture is of Matthias Corvinus, born 23 Feb., 1443-Died 26 April, 1490. Yes, I know that the date the sculptor died is the key date. Geo Swan (talk) 00:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
  Resolved

. --Túrelio (talk) 14:25, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2011-IMG 5025.jpg edit

Hi A.Catalina, when was the monument, shown in this image, installed and by whom (sculptor)? --Túrelio (talk) 06:41, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

According to the uploader's description template this sculpture is also of Matthias Corvinus, born 23 Feb., 1443-Died 26 April, 1490. Yes, I know that the date the sculptor died is the key date. Geo Swan (talk) 00:22, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
  Resolved

. --Túrelio (talk) 14:25, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2011-IMG 5018.jpg edit

Hi A.Catalina, when was the monument, shown in this image, installed and by whom (sculptor)? --Túrelio (talk) 06:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

According to the uploader's description template this sculpture is also of Matthias Corvinus, born 23 Feb., 1443-Died 26 April, 1490. Yes, I know that the date the sculptor died is the key date. Geo Swan (talk) 00:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
  Resolved

. --Túrelio (talk) 14:25, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2011-IMG 4694.jpg edit

Hi A.Catalina, when was the monument, shown in this image, installed and by whom (sculptor)? --Túrelio (talk) 06:55, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

According to ro:Ioan Ratiu he was born in 1828 and died in 1902. Ratiulla:en-US:official%26prmd%3Divnso Geo Swan (talk) 00:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2009-DSC04533.JPG edit

Hi A.Catalina, when was the monument, shown in this image, installed and by whom (sculptor)? --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

The sculpture has a plaque on it. I can't quite make it out. It seems to say:
prect ioan opris   
1878-1918
Brou Si Martir
Is the first line the name of the sculpted, and the last the name of the sculptor? Geo Swan (talk) 23:35, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
That's "Erou Şi Martir" ("Hero and martyr"). And it's not "prect", it's "preot" ("priest"). - Jmabel ! talk 04:00, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your contributions. Sadly, A.Catalina is still absolutely non-communicative. --Túrelio (talk) 06:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please do not recreate deleted content edit

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  +/−
 
Your image or other content, File:2009-DSC00711.JPG, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

--Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I looked at the restored image. It bears the name ro:Pavel Dan. The ro:Pavel Dan article specifically mentions this sculpture. It states the name of the sculptor -- ro:Virgil Fulicea -- who was born in 1908, the same year as Pavel Dan, but who lived to 1979.
That opens a couple of questions for me:
  1. I made a guess at Pavel Dan's age, when I looked at the sculpture. I would have guessed he was in his late 30s early 40s from the sculpture. But the article says he was only 30 when he died in 1937. I had wondered whehter the sculpture showed him as a young man, and he then might have lived decades -- which left open the possibility he outlived the sculptor by decades. Nope. So how come Fulicea made him look older?
  2. Since the romanian artic le specifically mentions the sculpture I wondered whether the romanian wikipedia could host the image under "fair use"?
A.Catalina, Romania is an interesting place. I hope I can count on more good images of Romania from you. I am concerned that you may not understand that some images you uploaded that don't comply with the policies here may end up getting limits imposed on your ability to upload any images. Please ask for help understanding how to comply with the policies, if you don't understand. Geo Swan (talk) 22:45, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2011-IMG 5673.jpg edit

 
File:2011-IMG 5673.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 06:38, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply


Please give images better names edit

العربية  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  עברית  italiano  日本語  magyar  македонски  മലയാളം  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  українська  中文  +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:2011-IMG 6024.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error. Please give uploaded files meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the file is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename your image with an intuitive name that describes the file itself. Thanks, and happy editing!


Can you finally please use descriptive names for your uploads! I have told you again and again, but you simply ignore it and continue to upload files with useless names: File:2011-IMG 6024.jpg, File:DSC09986-2009.JPG, File:2011-IMG 5832.jpg, File:2010-IMG 5834.jpg, File:2010-IMG 5826.jpg, File:2010-IMG 6155.jpg, File:2010-IMG 6159.jpg, File:2010-IMG 6109.jpg, File:2010-IMG 6111.jpg, File:2010-IMG 6120.jpg, File:2010-IMG 6383.jpg, File:2010-IMG 6134.jpg, File:2010-IMG 6127.jpg, File:2010-IMG 0153.jpg, File:2011-IMG 4714.jpg, File:2011-IMG 4730.jpg, File:2011-IMG 4741.jpg, File:DSC07940 24.05.2010.JPG, File:DSC07942 24.05.2009.JPG, File:DSC07962 24.05.2010.jpg, File:DSC08004 24.05.2010.JPG. --Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Commons:WikiProject Dacia edit

 
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA   and WP:DACIA   to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 23:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Commons:WikiProject Romania edit

 
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 21:16, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:2011-Statuie-detaliu-IMG 4467.jpg edit

Buna! La descriere scrie: "Statuia ecvestră a lui Mihai Viteazul din Cluj-Napoca - (detaliu)", insa aici e vorba de o stema/blazon. Ai putea sa da dai descrieri mai specifice? Ai foarte multe poze frumoase, dar ar fi ideal daca ai putea sa le descrii in mai mult detaliu si sa denumesti chiar si fisierele mai descriptiv, dupa cum ti-au scris si alti utilizatori mai sus. De ex: "Statuia lui Mihai Viteazul din Cluj-Napoca 2011 - Detaliu.jpg". Numele fisierelor apar in cautari, deci e important sa nu fie criptice. IMG4467 nu ajuta deloc. Si atentie la Freedom of Panorama pentru statui si cladiri! Numai bine si ti-am trimis o invitatie si la COM:WikiProject Romania. --Codrin.B (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Gilău - Cluj - Hartă-MarosBIKE.ro - IMG.jpg edit

 
File:Gilău - Cluj - Hartă-MarosBIKE.ro - IMG.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--NNW (talk) 15:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear A.Catalina,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 17:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open edit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last yearReply

File:OprisaniHCC2009.jpg edit

 
File:OprisaniHCC2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:52, 25 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Imagini comuna Livezile edit

Bună ziua Ana Măria,

ți-am introdus imaginile tale ale monumentului din comuna Livezile în categoria respectivă (am creat categoria). Pe viitor, daca, poti te rog să introduci pozele în categorii mai potrivite. Dacă acele categorii nu există poți creea una, sau mi te adresezi pe pagină mea de discuții în WP germană și voi incerca să te ajut. Salutări, --Stoschmidt (talk) 20:43, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

 
File:Cluj-Napoca-Universitatea Tehnică-vazutăț de pe Cetățuia-IMG 0701.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Septembrie 2019: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România! edit

Primiți acest mesaj deoarece ați participat anterior la concursul Wiki Loves Monuments România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Baia de Arieş-Monumentul Minerilor-IMG 6.JPG edit

 
File:Baia de Arieş-Monumentul Minerilor-IMG 6.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Masum Reza📞 20:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Masum Reza📞 21:07, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Septembrie 2020: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România! edit

Deși trecem prin momente dificile în aceste vremuri imprevizibile generate de pandemia de COVID-19, competiția Wiki Loves Monuments are loc și anul acesta, implicit și în România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Întrucât o carantină nu este programată în România, puteți să ieșiți în continuare să faceți fotografii - luând toate măsurile de siguranță recomandate de autoritățile locale de sănătate. Dacă preferați să evitați ieșirile, cu siguranță aveți fotografii cu monumente înregistrate pe calculator din ultima călătorie! Aceasta este o oportunitate excelentă de a le oferi o a doua viață prin concursului Wiki Loves Monuments. Pe lângă faptul că vor fi vizibile pentru toată lumea, fotografiile dumneavoastră ar putea reprezenta România în competiția internațională. De asemenea ele pot apărea în diverse articole la Wikipedia și pot contribui la conservarea online a patrimoniului cultural și istoric al României.

Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes vă dorim și să vă bucurați, în condiții de siguranță, de patrimoniul care vă înconjoară!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Cluj-Napoca-Opera Română-statuia Mihai Eminescu-2009.09.07.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:52, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply