Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, FreBSkarychatA!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:00, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Moulin des isles aprés 1907 et conversion en usine électrique.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Moulin des isles aprés 1907 et conversion en usine électrique.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, i made some mistake while uploading this file, it is an old post card we have in our family, so i have the licence to use it. I juste tried to use the same picture used by a website to, that is the reason why i did not make the right operation and you blocked me. it cause me a huge probleme cause i can not use anymore the picture i took personally to ad it on the page of the ancester i am contributing.--ABarr (talk) 23:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
hello JuTa, did you block my uploads?? whats the matter and i have a work on a page in progress...!! could you help me???--ABarr (talk) 23:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Why are you doing this?? are you a troll ? is it funny to block people trying to help the wikipedia community and working in it?--ABarr (talk) 23:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
ORTS everything is ok... but thanks for judgement and suspicion...--ABarr (talk) 23:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
LA LICENCE DU FICHIER EST DESORMAIS CORRECTE ET LES FICHIERS DE-SUPPRIMES... Quel dommage d'etre si prompte a la suppression et au blocage, et aussi peu au dialogue, explication et aide.. --ABarr (talk) 23:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:58, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

ORTS everything is ok... but thanks for judgement and suspicion...--ABarr (talk) 23:40, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your message edit

I had to revert your post on my talk because you erased the messages of other users in the process of posting. In future, please use the "Add topic" button at the top of the page, or be sure to add your post at the very bottom of the page, under all other posts, so as not to change or erase the comments of other users.

In regard to the above images, I deleted them per COM:PRP. We deal with thousands of images daily here, and so we often can't spend a lot of time looking into each case. I do my best. I understand your frustration, and I'm glad to see you've cleared every thing up and gotten the images restored. Take care. INeverCry 00:35, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello i understand, but i did not see messages deleted by my post? no importance, i was looking for our discuccion, wiche where directed ti archive 2, but after reading all pages was in page 7. I juste redit my post and had a answer...
i understand that you don't have many time to spend, but indeed i spent it in ouing this restor work during few weeks. and it was time spending for me too, uploading files, finding them, scanning them, naming them etc.. so the time you don't have is taken in mine in this example. And what i can say, is as a new user, i was informed that there where a discussion about this imags, but none as waited to my participitaion to this discussion wich one was very short "deleting?" and "deleted"...so i found that as new and motivated user, disouraging, because, the charte and guides and best pratices i see on Wikipedia and common wher no applying to my simple example... And i would have been happy, that with the disussion it should have been about this photos, my good faith would have been believed as first, and then giving me advices and help to resolve the probleme, but not a speedy prejudice and deletion and blocking quick to come as a hammer blow. I really have no interest by talking to you like that, only a feed back of a french new user, enjoyed by the french community and disapointing by the interractions in common, putting me off using it... only a feed back, no offense, i hope you'll understand, and maybe think even a little of what i can describe you as experiment and huge waist of time and engagement on my side :)
juste aboutCOM:PRP i see:
"Commons' users aim to build and maintain in good faith a repository of media files which to the best of our knowledge are free or freely-licensed. The precautionary principle is that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file it should be deleted."
i read "good faith"wich i didnt see and felt in that case
i read "significant" doubt.. doubt can i undertsand, but significant? was it a picasso uploaded as my own work? no just old pictures, of an old man and old manufactury and motors... where this photos already known? no already known as somebody's work? no a doubt can we have, but not "significant" because there are simple explenation, for people uploding new pictures, about someone you don't know, and there is nothing making this doubt "significant" .... i'm not known as picture's stealer, my good faith could have been maintain instead of building an doubt as significant on personnal appreciation or prejudice basis...
seems hard to just say "sorry" ...
take care, but please let french common admin oversee my uploads or just someone intersting of brand new old pictures or exchange with users
--ABarr (talk) 00:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Here's the talkpage revert I referred to. The messages highlighted in blue were overwritten by your post. As for time, you had an entire week to comment in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ABarr, which you were notified of above. If you'd commented, the images probably wouldn't have been deleted. In future, if you have any questions, you can ask French-speaking users at Commons:Bistro. INeverCry 01:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
i understant what you say. I m just saying i was looking to our discussion, so i DID NOT do,it in purpose...
For time, i had a week? but i saw the message too late, i could not know i had a message, i m not her everyday, there where no probleme until then, so i thaought it was eveything okay. The time? i only knwew i hac a week, when it happens, too late, how could hav i know, that this day, a message was posted, lating me only one week, to see the message, to know the time, and to answer.. so i did not see any messages positives on this discussion, only that i couldnt be possible... but it was too late, it happend one day, and ended one day, without giving me a chance of just knowing it...
asking french user, thanks! i were juste talking about admin deleting french user work, without any consideration and patience, or just simple advice or belief in good faith...
I hope i had see the first message, but if you see on my page, i already DID answer the same thing to an other admin trying to delete one of my picture the day i uploaded it. so the explanation was already on my discussion page. if you have just see it (because the discussion post where on it, no??)
thanks for all of this, it really make no sens with the word of community!
--ABarr (talk) 01:35, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry to see how this has upset you. I really do try my best to get things right, but of course that doesn't happen every time. Now that it's been figured out, I hope things will go more smoothly for you here in the future. INeverCry 01:56, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:2021 Photo PierreBordry Wikipedia.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2021 Photo PierreBordry Wikipedia.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2021 Photo PierreBordry Wikipedia.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Shev123 (talk) 08:42, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Julien Rubat.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:Julien Rubat.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Julien Rubat.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please, the artist authorised me to use the photo on his official website; what should I do to keep it permanently? Many thanks for your help FreBSkarychatA (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply


File:Julien Rubat.jpg edit

2A01:4C8:63:D401:F801:7946:6747:8FFC 14:38, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please do not recreate deleted content edit

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  +/−
 
Your image or other content, File:Julien Rubat.jpg, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

0x0a (talk) 15:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:JulienRubat-StudioVSC.webp edit

0x0a (talk) 15:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply