User talk:Agnes Monkelbaan/Archive 23

Agnes Monkelbaan/Archive 1: 2024

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuol-Motta Naluns, 15-09-2023. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Mike Peel 10:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Engiadina (Scuol). 15-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Scuol, Rablüzza. 15-09-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Scuol, Rablüzza. 15-09-2023. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:19, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez. 17-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra 16-09-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Wondering why there's so much color noise in the forest despite ISO 100. But it's visible only at highest resolution and not really disturbing. --Plozessor 05:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Scuol, Rablüzza. 15-09-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terp fan de Takomst bij Blije. 21-08-2023. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Heining gemaal bij Marrum 14-08-2023. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:58, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra 16-09-2023. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Engiadina (Scuol). 15-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Scuol, Rablüzza. 15-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Heining gemaal bij Marrum 14-08-2023. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl dadaint, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl dadaint, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl dadaint, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl dadaint, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche Scuol. 15-09-2023. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Scuol, Craista. 15-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche, Permez, Vnà, 16-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:56, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl 17-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl 17-09-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl dadaint, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Permez. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche, Permez, Vnà, 16-09-2023. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra 16-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Stradella. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:40, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straat in Vnà, Stradella. 16-09-2023. (actm.).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:40, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl 17-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl 17-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche, Permez, Vnà, 16-09-2023. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche, Permez, Vnà, 16-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez. 17-09-2023. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, 17-09-2023. (actm.).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Minor disturbing light spot at the top - acceptable. --XRay 10:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC) * Done. Removed spots. Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Fuschina 80, 17-09-2023. (actm.).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadows (door, roof, windows) are pretty noisy, any chance to improve that without losing sharpness? --Plozessor 05:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC) * Done. Noise reduced. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Great, better now! --Plozessor 18:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staartje van storm Gerrit. 28-12-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl dadaint, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez. 17-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra 16-09-2023. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staartje van storm Gerrit. 28-12-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel Tarasp (Tarasp Castle) Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staartje van storm Gerrit. 28-12-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra 16-09-2023. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Pretty noisy shadows but I think still ok. --Plozessor 05:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Scuol, Craista. 15-09-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This has a lot of noise in the shadows despite ISO 100 ... --Plozessor 05:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC) * Done. Noise reduction in the shadow parts. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:59, 20 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Ok now! --Plozessor 16:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche, Permez, Vnà, 16-09-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:30, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez. 17-09-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:30, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez. 17-09-2023. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Quite noisy wall, but not really an issue as the window is good. --Plozessor 05:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez. 17-09-2023. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Forest is a bit noisy but it's not the subject, so this is ok. --Plozessor 05:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez. 17-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Straat in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp (Taraspsee) gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel Tarasp (Tarasp Castle) Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra 16-09-2023. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems like something went wrong with the processing here. Trees on the left side appear partly grey and partly intense green. --Plozessor 05:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC) * Done. Correction WB. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Ok now. Still the trees have two quite different shades of green, but it might be two different species or caused by the lighting. In any case it's looking way more natural now. --Plozessor 05:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel Tarasp (Tarasp Castle) Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel Tarasp (Tarasp Castle) Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez. 17-09-2023. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche, Permez, Vnà, 16-09-2023. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Sinestra 16-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel Tarasp (Tarasp Castle) Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel Tarasp (Tarasp Castle) Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staartje van storm Gerrit. 28-12-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:40, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez. 17-09-2023. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 06:15, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Done. New version. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Better! --Plozessor 17:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel Tarasp (Tarasp Castle) Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shadows are too dark and noisy, see the windows of the right building part. --Plozessor 05:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC) * Done. New version. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Ok now! --Plozessor 17:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staartje van storm Gerrit. 28-12-2023. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 16:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche, Permez, Vnà, 16-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC) ==Quality Image Promotion==

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl dadaint, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl dadaint, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez. 17-09-2023. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Plaz, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit noisy in the shadows too, but still acceptable. --Plozessor 05:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Plaz, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Plaz-Bröl, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp (Taraspsee) gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp (Taraspsee) gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel Tarasp (Tarasp Castle) Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 06:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformierte Kirche Scuol. 15-09-2023. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp (Taraspsee) gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl dadaint, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp (Taraspsee) gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flurinaweg tussen Prui en Motta Naluns, 19-09-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp (Taraspsee) gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staartje van storm Gerrit. 28-12-2023. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Clear cw tilt --Poco a poco 06:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)  Done. Correction. Thank you.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC) I believe, it needs a bit more of correction --Poco a poco 18:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC) I added a note of the vertical tower.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 8 February 2024 (UTC) Me too --Poco a poco 19:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)  Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC) You made it worse IMHO, I pass it not the next reviewer --Poco a poco 06:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)  Done Another try. I started from the church tower again.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Ok, not perfect, but close enough --Poco a poco 07:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergweg tussen Motta Naluns en Sent, 19-09-2023. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flurinaweg tussen Prui en Motta Naluns, 19-09-2023. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergweg tussen Motta Naluns en Sent, 19-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit grainy at full resolution but acceptable. Still wondering why there's so much noise at ISO 100 with an EOS M. --Plozessor 05:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flurinaweg tussen Prui en Motta Naluns, 19-09-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Matutinho 20:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Matutinho 20:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in Vnà, Pedval. 16-09-2023. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel Tarasp (Tarasp Castle) Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC) A lot of color noise in the shadows (at and below the roof). --Plozessor 05:33, 15 February 2024 (UTC) * Done. Noise reduction in the shadow parts. Thanks for your reviews. Note: the walls are extremely dirty.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:14, 15 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 12:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergweg tussen Motta Naluns en Sent, 19-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl dadaint, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez. 17-09-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel Tarasp (Tarasp Castle) Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl 17-09-2023. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergweg tussen Motta Naluns en Sent, 19-09-2023. (actm.) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flurinaweg tussen Prui en Motta Naluns, 19-09-2023. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp (Taraspsee) gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergweg tussen Motta Naluns en Sent, 19-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flurinaweg tussen Prui en Motta Naluns, 19-09-2023. (actm.) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl 17-09-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergweg tussen Motta Naluns en Sent, 19-09-2023. (actm.) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flurinaweg tussen Prui en Motta Naluns, 19-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 11:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:16, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:16, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 12:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staartje van storm Gerrit. 28-12-2023. (actm.) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Bröl dadaint, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardez Kasteelruïne, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant (Evangelisch-Reformiert) Baselga de Arlez in Ardez. 17-09-2023. (actm.) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This has a lot of chroma noise ... --Plozessor 05:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC) * Done. Correction. Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woning in het centrum van Ardez, Plaz, 17-09-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarasp gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staartje van storm Gerrit. 28-12-2023. (actm.) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)