Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Aleksander Kaasik!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope edit

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Aleksander Kaasik, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--Motopark (talk) 15:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply


Wikimedia Commons has a specific topic edit

Deutsch  català  English  español  sicilianu  українська  日本語  polski  македонски  suomi  Nederlands  français  magyar  עברית  italiano  اردو  português  +/−
Please don't post messages that are not relevant to Wikimedia Commons. The site does not host articles, only media files such as images, video and audio. Neither should the site be used for chatting, promotion, personal webpages or other such things. For more detail, see Commons:Project scope. Thank you.

Motopark (talk) 15:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolga laht.Juminda..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Iifar 17:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puisenina must lammas..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:10, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Diplom."narva Sügis 2008".jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Diplom."narva Sügis 2008".jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Diplom."narva Sügis 2008".jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Kollaaž näitustest.jpg edit

 
File:Kollaaž näitustest.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Motopark (talk) 16:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Sotsialistliku võistluse toime.jpg edit

 
File:Sotsialistliku võistluse toime.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aga (d) 16:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Väikene Saarjärv, Antsla vallas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:11, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haanja küla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:16, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Kategooriad edit

Commonsis ei kasutata eestikeelseid kategooriaid (sama kehtib ka vene keele kohta). Samuti tuleb piltide kategoriseerimisel piirduda ainult kõige täpsemate võimalikke (olemasolevate) kategooriatega.

Kohati jäävad samuti küsitavaks pildiandmed (nt siin). Kruusamägi (talk) 13:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Töötlused edit

Kui enda varem üles laaditud faile töötled, siis palun laadi uus versioon üles sama pealkirja alla. Pildi kirjelduslehel alaosas "Faili ajalugu" on selle jaoks link "Laadi üles selle faili uus versioon" (Upload a new version of this file). 84.50.7.230 09:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Kustutamiseks esitatud failid edit

Kas see foto on samuti sinu isa tehtud?

Küsimusi põhjustab see, et kuna sina ei ole piltide autor ja pole ka päris selge, et kes ikka autor on, siis arvati, et siin võib-olla tegemist autoriõiguste rikkumisega. Seepärast need pildid ka vastavalt märgendati. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Mina olen pildi autor, sest digitaliseerisin minu enda negativist. Filminegativi autor on Aleksander Kaasi. ehk teisisõnu minu isa (kes samuti Aleksander). Seda esiteks. Ja teiseks,kui keegi kahtleb autorluses, siis peab ta tõestama, kes siis õige autor tema arvates on, mitte aga ajada "soga" autoriõiguste RIKKUMISEST.Enne tuleb ikka endale konkreetselt/faktidega olu selgeks teha, mitte "võib-olla" tasemel raisata autori aega, tõestamaks oma õiguseid, oskuseid ja võimalusi.Kolmandaks olen leidnud, et minu 30-40 aastat tagused fotod on samas "võib-olla" kaalutlustel koguni kadunud.Tundub, et oleks vaja Skype kaudu mõnele selgitada, kuidas, näiteks aastakümneid vana slaid on fotoaparaadiga digitaliseeritud, sealt saadud värske kuupäev jne.Samas aga näen pilte, kus on moonutatud kujundid, mida tuleks Vikipeediast kustutada.Iga looduses esinev vertikaaljoon ja horisontaalsed jooned (kortsnad,majaseinad,katuseharjad, aknad, lipuvardad jne) peaksid Vikipeedias olema samas asendis nagu looduses- tegelikus olus -- siit pinnalt võiks alustada autorsuse küsimust, sest fotograaf on võltsinud/moondanud tegelikkust ja pole oluline kas tahmatult, oskamatusest või mis tahes juhusel. Vikipeedia pilt peaks vastama tegelikuses esinevale objektile, aga seda paraku alati ei märgata:kas tahtlikult, oskamatusest jne.Ei hakka ka selle teemaga-põhjusega enda aega siinkohal raiskama, lihtsalt vahemärkus. Lõpetuseks:Jah, Kehra pilt on samast olust, mis Aegviidu.Tahaksin rõhutada, et ma ei pane kunagi üles vööraid pilte.Pole sellist vajadust, sest ei kirjuta artikleid, milles pole ise osalenud. Sisuliselt kirjutan enda loomingu, reiskirjade ning tähelepanekute ja mõne aastase teadustöö vallas tehtud märkmete põhjal. Olen seni kuskil kakssada pilti üles laadinud. Samavõrd on veel üles panna, et olemasolevatesse teiste kirjutatud artiklitesse lisa panna (äärmisel juhul siis mõne lausega pildi olu selgitamisek).Asi selles, et kui olen siit ilmast lahkunud, on minu CD ja DVD-l olevad sajad pildid kadunud, sellest siis eelistus ainult pildile, küllap kirjutajaid leidub. Ei kavatse loomulikult veel 73 aastaselt, teise ilma kolida, ent igaks juhuks peaks fotoarhiivi kohendama ja talvel on selleks aega. Suvel plaanin Venemaal 6-7 tuhat km autosõitu ning sealt siis uued pildid uuel talvel jne.Tänan hr.Kruusimäed, kes mitmel juhul mulle abi andnud ja mulle andnud loomisrõõmu Vikipeediasse sisenemiseks/sisenemisel nagu viimane suur Eesti looduspiltide laadimine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleksander Kaasik (talk • contribs) Reply

Et küsimusi ja kahtlusi ei tekiks, tuleb piltide juurde kirjutada õiged ja selged andmed. Piltide juurde lisatud märkustega on palutud, et andmed parandaksid või et lisaksid puuduvad andmed. Õigete andmete äratoomine on üleslaadija kohustus. Autor autoriõiguse mõistes on pildi tegija, s.t mitte digiteerija. Parandasin Kehra paberivabriku pildi kirjeldust: Special:Diff/149540458/150168181. Kui edaspidi oma isa pilte üles laadid, siis lisa palun sarnane kirjeldus. 84.50.7.230 16:32, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Ma püüan lasta üle vaadata ka ülejäänud pildid. Vast annab taastada. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Aleksander, palun mõnda kommentaari siia arutellu. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Moinaki limaani mudaravila 1980.a..jpg edit

 
File:Moinaki limaani mudaravila 1980.a..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sõnastasin pildi allkirjaks Moinaki limaani mudaravila pääsla 1980. a.Lõhutud ja laiali tassitud Ukraina iseseisuvmise aegu. ja samuti teise pildi: Moinaki limaani mudaravila ujumissild 1980.a.Krimm.Ukraina NSV.Lõhutud ja laiali tassitud Ukraina iseseisuvmise aegu. Ent ilmselt olen laadinud uued pildi, sest artiklis https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevpatorija on pildid praegu olemas ja mida kirjutise juurde lisatuna oluliseks pean, õigemini väga oluliseks, sest seda olu pole enam peaaegu 20 aastat.Esimest korda olin Jevpatorijas 1980 aastal ja viimati siis 2014 suvi.

 
File:Sissepääs Moinaki limaani mudaravilasse aastal 1980.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 16:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Mõned märkused edit

Lisasin su kasutajalehele keeleoskuse tabeli. Siis ehk ei kirjutata sel määral siia inglise keeles kommentaare, kui on kirjas, et seda keelt väga ei oska. Anna palun teada, kui see tabel vajab kohendamist. Tänan, tabel on õige ja samuti ülejäänud kohendamised Aleksander Kaasik Mõned pildi on nüüdseks taastatud (File:A.Kaasiku fotonäituse avamine.jpg, File:Niinsaare puhkekeskus.jpg, File:Brest, 22 september 1939.jpg). Seega eemaldasin siit lehelt nende kohta käivad kustutamismärkused. Moinaki pilte ei kustutata. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:08, 27 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Вид на Псковский Кром с реки Великой, 2014..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A.Savin 15:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Memoriaal Mamaev Kurgan.jpg edit

 
File:Memoriaal Mamaev Kurgan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 18:07, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Holodomor 1932-1933.jpg edit

 
File:Holodomor 1932-1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Base (talk) 00:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Püha Jüri võitlus lohega.jpg edit

 
File:Püha Jüri võitlus lohega.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 18:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Krimm.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Krimm.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Krimm.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 46.118.135.162.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 07:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply