Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alonsito201296!

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Alonsito201296!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 04:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Pacífico FC primeros años.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pacífico FC primeros años.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pacífico FC primeros años.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Rd232 (talk) 15:22, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Pacífico FC 2012.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pacífico FC 2012.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pacífico FC 2012.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Rd232 (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Pacífico FC final 2011.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pacífico FC final 2011.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pacífico FC final 2011.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Rd232 (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 04:41, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Pacífico kits edit

Yes, I'll make them. Spiraal (talk) 21:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Files were added. http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_Deportivo_Pac%C3%ADfico_FC Spiraal (talk) 21:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
I did what you asked. I think it's all okay now? Spiraal (talk) 21:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Camistetas edit

Hola Alonsito201296, he hecho la camiseta del Club Deportivo Universidad de San Martín de Porres, lo mejor que he podido. Cuando pueda intentaré la del Club Sport Victoria, que parece complicada. Un saludo. --Bashevis6920 (talk) 02:17, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Acabo de terminar la del Sport Victoria. Saludos. --Bashevis6920 (talk) 06:08, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Sí, le he puesto un color gris oscuro a las rayas de la camiseta del C.D. Universidad de San Martín, porque no podía precisar bien los tonos. Puedes variar el color a tu parecer. Ha sido un placer ayudarte, Alonsito201296. Saludos. :) --Bashevis6920 (talk) 22:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

UTC edit

Files were created and added. Spiraal (talk) 15:17, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

The collor was changed(the facebook photo is horrible). For the sleeve details, I used a darker shade of cream, not gold, because it's visually better. Spiraal (talk) 20:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Não há problema. Eu pedi para que os arquivos da camisa negra fossem renomeados. Spiraal (talk) 21:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Municipal edit

Eu provavelmente terei que fazer um arquivo novo, em vez de apenas consertar alguns detalhes. Spiraal (talk) 21:32, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cádiz edit

Não é possível visualizar a foto da camiseta home. Poderia enviar outra por favor? Spiraal (talk) 21:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Camisas Liga BBVA e Liga Adelante edit

Olá amigo, sei que você pede ao Spiraal kits para serem feitos, e então peça a ele os uniformes de 2012-13, da Liga BBVA de alguns times (você vê quais são os times) e da Liga Adelante (você vê quais são os times) e peça a ele. Abraços. --Gustavo neto (talk) 13:16, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Villareal/Cobresol edit

Pode fazer a alteração caso desejar, por mim o arquivo ficou bom, não há porque alterar. A de Villareal não precisa mudar. Spiraal (talk) 17:36, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

La camiseta de Cobresol sí necesita cambio, en especial el cuello y las mangas (y además las rayas verticales son más gruesas, casi como mi version). Mientras que la de Villarreal, la version que está actualmente es la 2011/12, la imagen que te mostré era del 2012/13.--Alonsito201296 (talk) 22:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ponferradina edit

O kit de Ponferradina já está feito. Spiraal (talk) 22:17, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Moreirese edit

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moreirense Spiraal (talk) 22:08, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

usm alger kit 2012-13 edit

[1] home [2] away --Principal adjoint (talk) 16:55, 11 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Agora Quem?? edit

Amigo, Spiraal saístes da Wiki, agora quem vai fazer os kits?

Bruno-ban edit

Acho também que ele saiu, o último kit dele é de agosto, então ele também se foi. --Gustavo neto (talk) 03:29, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Terceira camisa e meiões Real Garcilaso edit

[3]. --Gustavo neto (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Real Zaragoza edit

You can find the kits here. -- Zotteteen1 (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Kits! Are they best? edit

[4] and [5]. Thanks! I wait a answer! Greetings! --Gustavo neto (talk) 19:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Los Caimanes 1960.jpg edit

 
File:Los Caimanes 1960.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Reply