Andreas.Didion

Butterfly picture

Hello, we are trying to identify the species in your beautiful picture Image:Schmetterling2005-07-26 01.jpg but have drawn a blank so far. Can you let me know if it was taken in the wild or in captivity as I don't recognize it as a European species. Thanks, Richard Barlow

Hello, i have all thinks found. its any very lucky shot ;-) in the WILDerness by http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urweiler (Location: JN39OL)  ;-))
Andreas.Didion 18:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Loligo vulgaris.jpg

Hi, I uploaded a higher resolution version of above picture. You may or may not want to reconsider your vote. Cheers Lycaon 19:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

picture of the day

cheer, beautiful image!--Luc Viatour 20:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

POTY 2006

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 11:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Nutzung einer deiner Bilder außerhalb der Wikimedia

Hallo Andreas.Didion,

viele Uploader hier auf Commons wünschen sich wenn jemand seine Bilder außerhalb der Wikimedia verwendet eine kurze Rückmeldung. Da ich dies ebenfalls schön finde, will ich dich nur über die Verwendung deines Bildes Image:Parthenos sylvia philippensis.jpg auf einer meiner Homepages namens www.openwallpaper.de.vu

Grüße, ← Körnerbrötchen - @ 13:49, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

New level {{User VG-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?

VG-4

This user is able to contribute with an expert level on vector graphics.

--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:36, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Andreas.Didion/temp

User:Andreas.Didion/temp has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arnd (talk) 11:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC)