Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Andreas Bohnenstengel!

-- 16:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Foto Kim Schmitz edit

Hallo Andreas! Schönen Dank für das Foto von Kim Schmitz. Würdest Du bitte noch in der Dateibeschreibung des Fotos die Angaben ergänzen, wo & wann Du die Aufnahme gemacht hast? Danke & Gruß --Sir James (talk) 12:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Andreas Bohnenstengel!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fotos: Wolfgang Ramadan SZ edit

Hallo Andreas, und vielen Dank für diese Beiträge. Es gibt dabei zwei große Probleme. Zuerst einmal ist der ganze Artikel drumherum mit eingescannt, was bedeutet, dass diese Bilder alle Urheberrechtsverletzungen sind und gelöscht werden müssten. Das kannst Du aber schnell und einfach beheben, indem Du nur den Ausschnitt mit dem Foto einscannst und die alten Bilder auf den jetzt hier vorhandenen Bildseiten mit "eine neue Version hochladen" ersetzt.

Das nächste Problem ist eben auch, dass das gamze schon mal veröffentlicht worden ist, d. h. Du müsstest noch ausdrücklich per Email eine Bestätigung an die Wikimedia Foundation schicken, dass dieses Material von Dir unter der entsprechenden Lizenz hier zum öffentlich Gebrauch bereitgestellt wird. Mehr dazu hier. De728631 (talk) 22:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hallo De728631! Ich melde mich hier, weil ich Andreas ein wenig beim Einstellen und Lizensieren seiner Fotos helfe. Okay; Zeitungsausschnitte hochzuladen, die fremde Texte beinhalten, ist keine gute Idee. Du hast dankenswerterweise angegeben, wie er das aus der Welt schaffen kann. Dein zweites Argument kann ich nicht recht nachvollziehen. Andreas lädt seine von ihm selbst angefertigten Fotografien hoch und gibt eine der gültigen Lizenzen an. Damit sind die Voraussetzungen erfüllt. Er ist der Rechteinhaber, das hat er bereits erklärt, indem er beim Hochladen weiterklickt und ein zweites Mal, indem er dies in der Dateibeschreibung angibt (Quelle: own/eigenes Werk). Ich kann nicht erkennen, warum eine zusätzliche Erklärung an das OTRS-Team notwendig sein sollte. Gruß --Sir James (talk) 22:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Weil sich nunmal jeder Benutzer Andreas Bohnenstengel nennen kann, auch wenn der echte Herr Bohnenstengel gar nicht dahinter steckt. Gerade bei solchen "Kultfotos" aus der Zeitung müssen wir uns vor Nachahmern schützen (siehe "Flickr-washing"). Was nicht heißen soll, dass ich Andreas hier böse Absichten unterstellen will. Und so wie es auf en.wiki erklärt ist, benötigt man für jedwede Zweitveröffentlichung via WMF eine Bestätigung der Rechte, auch wenn man definitiv der Urheber ist. Das mit dem OTRS habe ich nicht von ungefähr vorgeschlagen, sondern auch, weil meiner Erfahrung nach solche Lizenzen regelmäßig per Löschantrag angezweifelt werden. De728631 (talk) 23:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Um diesen Zweifel an der Identität auszuräumen, sollte eine Mail genügen. Genau eine. Zu verlangen, dass jeder Upload zusätzlich mit einer solchen Ehrenerklärung zu versehen sei, ist eindeutig über das Ziel hinaus geschossen. Ich freue mich sehr, dass wir hier Profiaufnahmen spendiert bekommen; noch dazu von Menschen, zu welchen wir nur sehr schwer Fotos bekommen können. Außerdem dazu sind diese Arbeiten von ungewöhnlich guter Qualität; mit einem überraschend agierenden Blick gemacht. Gruß --Sir James (talk) 23:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Ich habe auch nie verlangt, dass alle Fotos einzeln bestätigt werden sollen. De728631 (talk) 23:27, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Und vielen Dank an Andreas für die Korrekturen! De728631 (talk) 23:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Gern geschehen edit

Also hiermit möchte ich versichern, dass ich der echte wahre und einzigartige Andreas Bohnenstengel aus München bin. Mein Nutzerprofil gibt ein wenig Auskunft: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Andreas_Bohnenstengel . Die Zeitungsausschnitte sollten eigentlich nur Provenienz der Fotografien sein. Mit besten Grüßen Andreas

People of Munich edit

Hallo Andreas, vielen Dank für die tollen Bilder. Damit Du Dich nicht wunderst, warum ich nun zum zweiten Mal einige Deiner Fotos aus Category:People of Munich entfernt habe: Wenn Bilder bereits in einer Personenkategorie enthalten sind, dann werden die Oberkategorien dieser Personenkategorie den einzelnen Bildern nicht erneut zugewiesen. Und Category:Andreas Bohnenstengel ist bereits in Category:People of Munich enthalten. Beste Grüße, --Rudolph Buch (talk) 11:59, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Spielsucht.jpg edit

File:Spielsucht.jpg edit

 
File:Spielsucht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M.E. besteht die ernste Gefahr, dass Persönlichkeitsrechte verletzt werden, da die Person durchaus identifzierbar sein kann.--Lefschetz (talk) 07:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hallo, Andreas, ich habe hier bzgl. des Bildes eine Frage gestellt. Grüße, --Coyote III (talk) 16:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Armin Schulz.jpg edit

 
File:Armin Schulz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 14:30, 21 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Spielsucht.jpg edit

 
File:Spielsucht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sebari (talk) 16:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Büro Rolf Müller.webm edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Büro Rolf Müller.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 17:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Gaudirndldrahn 02.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gaudirndldrahn 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 21:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Gaudirndldrahn 03.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gaudirndldrahn 03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 21:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Gaudirndldrahn 01.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gaudirndldrahn 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 21:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Urheberrecht bei Zeitungsartikeln? edit

Hallo,

ich fürchte, für einige deiner jüngsten Beiträge gilt dasselbe, was hier vor einigen Jahren bereits diskutiert wurde: die Rechte an den gescannten oder fotografierten Zeitungsartikeln gehören erst einmal dem Herausgeber der Zeitung, selbst wenn du der Autor der Artikel bist (Own work, nicht nur Self-photographed) – da müsste in deinem Vertrag mit der Zeitung eine Klausel über anderweitige Verwendung stehen:

Das BISS-Bild könnte gehen, weil man dort die Schrift nicht lesen kann. Aber die anderen Artikel kann man lesen. Da bräuchte WC wohl eine Zustimmung von Hallo bzw. SZ. Das könnte möglich sein, für meinen eigenen Netzauftritt habe ich so was schon mal bekommen.

Grüße, -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Boxtraining 04.jpg edit

 
File:Boxtraining 04.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: copyrighted photographs as collage from an interieur
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Achim Raschka (talk) 18:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Altenheim_36.jpg edit

Hallo Andreas, mit diesem Edit hast du den Lizenzbaustein von dem Foto entfernt. Falls du das nicht zurückänderst, muss es gelöscht werden. --Túrelio (talk) 20:52, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Entschuldigung. Es ist von mir bei der Modifizierung der Bildbeschreibung versehentlich gelöscht worden. Danke für den Hinweis. Beste Grüße --Andreas 10.01, 18. März. 2018 (CET)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey edit

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Done. Andreas 12.01, 3. April 2018 (CET)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey edit

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey edit

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Danke für die immer wiederkehrenden Erinnerungen. Wie ich bereits mitteilte, habe ich an der Umfrage längst teilgenommen. Andreas

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 15:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ich zitiere die Doppeseite in dem ich Sie nicht vollständig zeige. Name und Seitenzahl der über 20 jahre alten Veröffentlichung in dem Magazin (dessen Verlag gar nicht mehr existiert) sind vollständig genannt. --Andreas 09:41, 30 Juni 2018 (UTC)

 
File:Die Erstausgabe der Novelle Angst von Stefan Zweig.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goesseln (talk) 15:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bilder von Meisam edit

Hi, du hast neulich im WikiMuc Bilder von Technik für User:Meisam gemacht. Kannst du die bitte noch hier hochladen. Wir füllen dann die Beschreibungen aus und kategorisieren sie, etc. Danke! -- Michael F. Schönitzer 19:17, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Important message for file movers edit

 

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

thanks edit

thanks for your pictures of retirement home. :-) 77.235.178.3 17:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

We need your feedback! edit

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Marie Luise Wilckens im Muenchner Merkur.jpg edit

Hallo Andreas, ist das in der Zeitung abgedruckte Foto auch von dir oder nur das von Foto von dem Zeitungsausschnitt? --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Das in der Zeitung abgedruckte Foto ist von mir. Siehe: Category:Marie Luise Wilckens. 13 October 2021 Andreas

Hinzufügen einer Legende edit

Hallo, ich habe eine Datei über einen Hund im "Gefängnis" gefunden, aber es fehlte eine Legende, also habe ich sie erstellt (allerdings ist sie auf Französisch, aber ich werde sie auf Deutsch einfügen).TYURZ-Commons (talk) 17:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Merci beaucoup! 29 April 2022 Andreas

Copyright status: File:Fototapete Kaputzinerstrasse 2022 03.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:Fototapete Kaputzinerstrasse 2022 03.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fototapete Kaputzinerstrasse 2022 03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ich danke dir Andreas Bohnenstengel (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ich habe die Beschreibung nachgeliefert und bitte um die Freigabe. Andreas Bohnenstengel (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kingsif (talk) 13:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply