User talk:Andrei Stroe/Archive 2

Category:Emilian_of_Durostorum_church_in_Ogrezeni,_Giurgiu

Ai amestecat mai multe biserici aici. Cea din Obedeni are hramul Sf. Nicolae, Sf. Dimitrie și Cuvioasa Paraschiva. [1]--Strainu (talk) 09:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Brașov Fortress & friends

Categoria Category:Brașov Fortress e folosită pentru Cetățuie, iar tu ai creat cateogrii pentru fortificațiile orașului de tipul Category:South-West side of Brașov Fortress. Cred că ar trebui ceva de tipul Category:South-West side of Brașov city walls--Strainu (talk) 19:47, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Oricum va trebui să revizitez, dar dacă crezi că e o greșeală evidentă, poți corecta.—Andrei S. _Talk 08:06, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Procopie Casota mansion in Casota, Buzău County, Romania.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RO SB Lutsch house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

File renaming

Hi Andrei Stroe, is there a specifici reason why you want images to be renamed with files like this, this or this to commence with RO NT? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

All my location-relevant images (except some of my old uploads) are named using this convention: <country code> <administrative unit code> <settlement> <description in English>. I'm trying to unify those few from the old days with the ones here. The one you're asking about also has the description in Romanian, so all the more reason for me to move it to the new style. Here, RO is the country (Romania), NT is the county (Neamț) and Roman is the settlement.—Andrei S. _Talk 13:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Yordan Stratiev.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Yordan Stratiev.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Saint Nicholas' Orthodox church in Mănăstirea, Cluj

Hi! It seems to me that in the Category:Saint Nicholas' Orthodox church in Mănăstirea, Cluj the photos of two different churches are mixed. One has the code CJ-II-m-B-07702 (Saint Nicholas) and the other CJ-II-m-B-07703 (Holy Cross). Could you separate them? --Hkoala (talk) 14:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

I'll look.—Andrei S. _Talk 14:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Muntii John Crow.png

File:Muntii John Crow.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

//  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 7 March 2016 17:34 (UTC) 17:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Muntii Albastri 2.png

File:Muntii Albastri 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

//  Gikü  said  done  Monday, 7 March 2016 17:34 (UTC) 17:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Salut

Am încercat să o încadrez ca logo, dar spunea ceva cu ștergere rapidă. Cum fac să apară ca logo legitim, cu tot cu justificare UC Logo? Corvin Victor Paul (talk) 15:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Doar dacă logoul este liber (autorul l-a eliberat, drepturile de autor au expirat sau este unul foarte simplu) poate fi păstrat la Commons, vedeți Commons:Licențiere.—Andrei S. _Talk 09:08, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Salut, Andrei! Te rog să arunci o privire aici: [2]. --Mihai Andrei (talk) 12:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Coperta albumului Târziu cu autograf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests

I have scanned my own CD cover, it contains also the autograph of the author, I am the legal representative of Emeric Imre and I am authorised to use the image of his album covers. The copyright of the cover of the album belongs to Emeric Imre that entitles me to use it on wikipedia. If you need an official paper to solve this copyright warning that never cease I can deliver you from this official facebook page https://www.facebook.com/emericimreofficial/ that I manage or by mail at emericfolk at gmail.com with the condition not to distribute the documents.

Liancu (talk) 15:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Please state this in an OTRS message sent from an address that can be linked with Emeric Imre.—Andrei S. _Talk 13:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

OTRS? sincer nu vreau sa fiu admin wiki ca sa inteleg toate sistemele alambicate prin care mesajele si drepturile de autor pot si dovedite. Aveti niste sisteme care nu sunt user friendly si trebuie sa fii iesit de la Oxford & Yale & Cambridge ca sa pricepa omu' ceva. V-am propus un raspuns pe mail, facebook chiar si telefon cu posesorul drepturilor de autor mai mult nu am timp sa fac. Fac de 30 de ani sisteme informatice da unu' asa de rau facut asa de NU user friendly pentru editori nu am vazut. Probabil ca o sa piara si asta cu timpul din cauza "complicatimii" sale. Ciao --Liancu (talk) 13:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Nu văd ce e așa de complicat; dumneavoastră trebuie doar să trimiteți un e-mail. Dedesubturile OTRS-ului poate sunt complicate, dar doar voluntarii care-l folosesc se confruntă cu ele. —Andrei S. _Talk 15:31, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Iarna mea cu ochii mari scanat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion request

I have scanned my own CD cover, I am the legal representative of Emeric Imre and I am authorised to use the image of his album covers. The copyright of the cover of the album belongs to Emeric Imre that entitles me to use it on wikipedia. If you need an official paper to solve this copyright warning that never cease I can deliver you from this official facebook page https://www.facebook.com/emericimreofficial/ that I manage or by mail: emericfolk at gmail.com with the condition not to distribute the documents

Liancu (talk) 15:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo Andrei Stroe!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RO BZ Fundeni Marghiloman mansion 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RO CV Turia calvinist church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Konstantine Venizelos 1913.jpg

File:Konstantine Venizelos 1913.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

C messier (talk) 15:43, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

File:ROU GJ Turceni CoA.jpg

File:ROU GJ Turceni CoA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

gexge79 (talk) 12:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

File:ROU GJ Capreni CoA.jpg

File:ROU GJ Capreni CoA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

gexge79 (talk) 12:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

File:ROU GJ Stejari CoA.jpg

File:ROU GJ Stejari CoA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

gexge79 (talk) 13:02, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

File:ROU GJ Ticleni CoA.jpg

File:ROU GJ Ticleni CoA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

gexge79 (talk) 13:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Barnstar

Îți mulțumesc în numele wikipediștilor care au profitat de imaginile transferate de tine de la ro.wp pentru întreaga activitate desfășurată în acest domeniu și personal pentru File:RO_DB_Varfuri_church.jpg, care mi-a trecut peste pragul de 6% monumente cu imagini ultimul județ rămas în urmă (DB). Premiul l-am pus direct pe pagina ta de utilizator.--Strainu (talk) 22:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Mihai Vasile.jpg: Copyright Agreement

Please find here bellow the Copyright Agreement to publish the picture of Mihai Vasile, on https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mihai_Vasile page.

Thank you!

Cris2017 (talk) 19:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC) I hereby affirm that I, Andrei Pungovschi, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work as shown here:

http://dilemaveche.ro/sectiune/tema-saptamanii/articol/un-act-subiectiv-responsabil-interviu-cu-mihai-vasile

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5]

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Andrei Pungovschi

Copyright holder

Nov 4th, 2016

Cris2017 (talk) 19:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Please use OTRS to clarify the copyright status.—Andrei S. _Talk 19:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

File:RO B Union Square Unirea Shopping Center.jpg

File:RO B Union Square Unirea Shopping Center.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

File:RO TM Orthodox cathedral 1.jpg

File:RO TM Orthodox cathedral 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Turbojet (talk) 12:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Фотоконкурсът „Уики обича Земята“ 2017 започва – очакваме те!

„Уики обича Земята“ 2017 започва!

Здравей, Andrei Stroe/Archive 2

получаваш това писмо, тъй като миналата година си участвал/а в изданията на „Уики обича Земята“ през 2015 или 2016 г. или „Уики обича паметниците“ 2015 или 2016. До края на този месец юни, те каним отново да участваш в тазгодишното фотосъстезание „Уики обича Земята 2017“.

Отново търсим твоите снимки от защитените природни обекти на България – национални и природни паркове, резервати, защитени местности и природни забележителности и отново това могат да са както пейзажи, така и снимани в близък план животни и растения. Специален акцент тази година поставяме на снимките на балканските и българските еднемични растителни видове. Отново няма ограничения за броя снимки, с които можеш да участваш в конкурса и можеш да използваш същата регистрация в Общомедия като миналогодишната. Не е нужно и снимките да са правени през този един месец – можеш да разгледаш архивите си и да споделиш снимки и от минали години и сезони. Единственото условие на конкурса е да отдадеш снимките си под свободен лиценз и без водни знаци и други надписи с декларации за авторството върху тях.

Авторите на първите 10 класирани снимки ще продължат в международния кръг на „Уики обича Земята“ и ще представят страната ни. Някои от партньорите ни в конкурса ще предоставят награди – книги по география и екология. Междувременно, ако качиш над 25, 50 и 100 снимки, ще получиш съответно виртуална бронзова, сребърна и златна УОЗ-значка  ;)

Но най-важното за „Уики обича Земята“ е, че с дарените от теб снимки енциклопедичното знание, достъпно на български език, се разраства и подобрява, тъй като използваме снимките за илюстриране на съществуващи и създаване на нови статии в Уикипедия! Затова не се колебай, а участвай! :)

УОЗдрави,

Екипът на „Уики обича Земята“! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

O sa am nevoie de poza pe care am pus-o mai devreme inapoi pe pagina Dan Voiculescu (politician). Nu imi dau seama de ce fix cum am intrat pe pagina unui om de asemenea anvergura, a inceput jocul de-a soarecele si pisica. Era sigur pe de-o parte ca asa va fi, de aici pornind si curiozitatea mea de a incepe editarea cu astfel de oameni. Informatiile pe care incerc sa le modific sunt false si nedocumentate. Exemple stau paragrafe intregi fara sens si fara referinte dar bogate in detalii de parca le-a scris cineva care a stat langa el. Si ma acuzati pe mine de conflict de interese ca pun un document oficial sau poza facuta de mine. Tipic romanesc.--Sealview27 (talk) 11:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Sunt multe în neregulă cu ce spuneți.

(1) La obiect: aveți sau nu drepturi de autor asupra fotografiei? Ea este publicată deja și atribuită Agerpres, deci protejată de drepturi de autor. Dacă într-adevăr lucrați la Agerpres și ați făcut fotografia, atunci dumneavoastră puteți lămuri cine are drepturi de autor. Îndrumarea COM:OTRS vă poate fi de folos.

(2) Nu e vorba de anvergura subiectului. Subiecte ca w:ro:Donald Trump sunt de anvergură mult mai mare, și totuși mult mai puțin asaltate de informații false. În cazul acesta, e vorba de cantitatea de manipulări și informații false vehiculate în jurul unui subiect în mediul de limba română. ro.wp este poarta de intrare pentru toată Wikipedia pentru informații referențiate din surse românofone. Asta a făcut ca ediția în română a Wikipediei să fie asaltată de persoane lipsite de interesul de a fi neutre și care de-a lungul timpului au venit să-și promoveze punctele de vedere pe acest subiect. De aceea, dintre biografiile de persoane în viață, câteva să fie cu adevărat subiecte complicat de tratat și să intre în multe liste de pagini urmărite ale multor wikipediști vechi și activi. Din acest punct de vedere, la ro.wp, w:ro:Dan Voiculescu (politician) este al doilea cel mai problematic articol după w:ro:Vladimir Plahotniuc. Cam asta este complexitatea problematicii pe care ați ales să o abordați ca prima dumneavoastră experiență editorială la Wikipedia. De aceea vă recomandam un subiect mai ușor.

(2a) Și a spune că încercați să modificați informații false și documentate denotă ori că ignorați tot ce vă spun, ori că nu ați înțeles nimic: în repetate rânduri, a trebuit să restaurez informații referențiate (deci documentate) pe care le-ați șters. Când ați citat surse conforme standardelor proiectului, v-am ajutat să integrați în articol destule informații verificabile pe care le-ați adus în completarea a ce era acolo.

(3) Conflictul de interese nu e o acuzație. Toți avem subiecte în raport cu care putem fi în conflict de interese, dar fiecare și-l gestionează altfel: cei mai mulți pur și simplu evităm să scriem despre acele subiecte. Nu e interzis să fii în conflict de interese. Interzis e doar să-l ascunzi în timp ce alegi să scrii pe subiecte în care îl ai. Și e interzis nu numai de bunul simț, ci și de termenii de utilizare ai proiectelor WMF, și de lege.—Andrei S. _Talk 12:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Poesis Editio in Multis Linguis Avril 2012-wikipedia.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Poesis Editio in Multis Linguis Avril 2012-wikipedia.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Poesis Editio in Multis Linguis Avril 2012-wikipedia.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 16:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Ticket#2017092610002179

Hello, Andrei Stroe. Could you help to scrutinize my photo which OTRS license can be passed or not? Since no volunteers follow and it will be deleted after a few days. Thank you. Silly Bill (talk) 11:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

hi!

Hi, Andrei! I'm Mykola Prikhodko, Ukrainian wikipedian. Today I will be at 20-14 in Bucuresti. I need your help. I need some accomadation. May be coachsurfing... But I can't enter to site from my mobile! Please, help me! My mob. 072 66 52-823. Multumesc! Nickispeaki (talk) 14:32, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Sorry I couldn't help you, I was out of town myself.—Andrei S. _Talk 08:53, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Iagnov

Stimate dl. Andrei Stroe

Cu privire la imaginile (fata, verso) ale CD-lui "Si gandurile plang si lacrimile dor DAN IAGNOV" (File:Iagnov7.JPG si File:Iagnov6.JPG, din pagina Dan Iagnov Wikipedia),CD comandat de mine 2013, in memoriam Dan Iagnov si platit integral de mine (2900 EURS (am contract si facturi),va rog sa-i contactati pe dl. Ovidiu Komornyic Directorul OVO MUSIC si dl. Lucian Nuta Directorul artistic OVO MUSIC pentru a va confirma cele spuse. Imaginile sunt facute de sotia domnului Lucian Nuta, graficiana, (eu propunand initial altele) si am fost de acord cu ele considerandu-le mai potrivite pentru felul de a fi al lui Dan Iagnov. Nu exista nici un plagiat. Vorbiti va rog cu cele doua persoane care va pot confirma cele spuse de mine. In concluzie nu sunt de acord cu scoaterea acestor doua imagini din pagina Dan Iagnov Wikipedia. V-am mai scris si mai scriu o data de ce am facut aceasta pagina Wikipedia. Dan Iagnov fiind un om foarte introvertit, de-a dreptul ascuns, nu se stia mai nimic despre el (nici anul nasterii care pe INTERNET aparea 1949, corect 1935). Ceea ce pe de o parte e bine pentru ca s-au evitat barfele dar pe de alta parte este rau pentru ca se incepuse o serie de nereguli in legatura cu cantecele lui. Pentru a clarifica toata discografia lui am facut Tabele intregi cu ordinea aparitiei cantecelor, CD-urilor, casetelor cu titlul, Casa de discuri, anul aparitiei, textierul, si interpretul respectiv interpretii. Nu a fost de loc usor. Mi-au trebuit cateva luni sa fac pagina sub forma DOC si sa platesc pe cineva pentru a o trece pe INTERNET. Consider ca pagina Dan Iagnov Wikipedia este foarte reusita si corecta din toate punctele de vedere (fara nici un plagiat). Ca sa evit si alte comentarii pe pozele din interiorul paginii va lamuresc eu. Pozele din casa sunt facute de mine (amenajarea posterelor pe pereti e munca mea, casa este mostenire lasata de Dan Iagnov si pe care vreau s-o fac Casa Memoriala asa cum apare si in imaginea verso a CD-ului). Placa comemorativa care apare pe zidul blocului eu am comandat-o 950 RON), eu am fotografiat-o. Mormantul eu l-am facut (3000 RON). Eu il intretin facand diferite aranjamente florale (deja au trecut 4 ani (va rog examinati adresa: "Category:Grave of Dan Iagnov - Wikimedia Commons" sa vedeti cele 28 de ipostaze ele mormantului Dan Iagnov. Eu cred ca in lume nu este asa ceva. Uite ca ma mandresc cu asta). In legatura cu emisiunea "Pe malurile Senei" realizata de Dan Iagnov in anii 2001-2003. O bijuterie de emisiune despre Paris si Chansoneta franceza. Fotografia CD-ului eu am facut-o (CD-ul imi aprtine. El s-a distribuit gratis dar acum nimeni nu-l mai poate avea deoarece nu se distribuie in nici un fel). Aceasta emisiune a fost realizata la Radio Romania Muzical, emisiune care s-a transmis, la inceput in direct si mai apoi, pana in 2013 in reluare. In 2013 Radio Romania Muzical a pus 30 de episoade din cele 50 pe INTERNET (si le multumesc pentru acest lucru),la adresa: "Pe malurile Senei cu Dan Iagnov - Radio România Muzical". Va rog sa clicati in GOOGLE pe adresa si sa ascultati macar un episod. Am trecut aceasta adresa in pagina Dan Iagnov Wikipedia, nu ca reclama, ci ca multi ma intreaba unde pot sa asculte sau sa cumpere vreun CD cu aceasta frumoasa emisiune. Consider ca Radio Romania Muzical ne-a facut un cadou regal punand-o pe INTERNET. Asa ca eu le dau adresa. Nu este nici o neregula de vreme ce ei au pus-o pe INTERNET. Si ca sa imi fie mie mai usor am considerat ca e mai bine sa citeasca pagina Dan Iagnov Wikipedia si in felul acesta sa afle si de emisiunaea "Pe malurile Senei" si alte informatii, respectiv ca cele 2 CD-uri "Si gandurile plang si lacrimile dor DAN IAGNOV" si "LOUISAMOUR Luiza Cioca/Dan Iagnov" eu le distribui gratis. Va rog sa lasati pozele in pagina pentru ca nu exista nici un dubiu de pagiat, de fals sau altceva. In alta ordine de idei, dumneavoastra care aveti simtul esteticii (vad pozele frumoase pe care le faceti, mult high quality sau valuables) dar imi uratiti mie pagina. Daca ati scos pozele de la CD-ul LOUISAMOUR Luiza Cioca/Dan Iagnov" de ce nu scoateti si carapacea goala?. Pagina pare foarte inestetica. Eu am scos aceste carapace dar dumneavoastra le-ati pus la loc. Mie pagina Dan Iagnov Wikipedia mi se pare foarte frumoasa asa cum am facut-o eu Si corecta. Sper ca v-am dat toate lamuririle. Cu stima pentru frumoasele poze pe care le realizatt Mirela Britchi--Britchi Mirela (talk) 13:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Arcul de triumf panorama 1.1.jpg

File:Arcul de triumf panorama 1.1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 15:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Legea referitor la imagini din spatiul public (webfinds)

Buna ziua! Ce criterii trebuie sa indeplineasca o fotografie aflata pe un site web din Romania, accesibil public (fara autentificare), pentru a putea fi incarcata pe Wikimedia? De asemenea, sub ce licenta este recomandat a se incarca astfel de imagini? Teutorigos (talk) 13:44, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Alegerea licenței e privilegiul deținătorului drepturilor de autor, or nu este cazul cu aceste "webfinds". Webfinds nu se pot încărca pe Commons: simplul fapt că sunt publicate nu înseamnă că sunt și libere. Doar în cazul în care intră în mod cert într-o categorie cu drepturi de autor expirate (adică autor care murise sigur acum 70 de ani) pot fi încărcate aici. Imaginile publicate în România înainte de 1996 sunt libere și se etichetează cu {{PD-Ro-1956}}, dar trebuie cumva demonstrat că au fost publicate în România (găsirea lor pe un domeniul .ro nu este suficientă) înainte de 1996 — lipsa îndeplinirii oricărei din cele două condiții face ca eticheta să nu fie aplicabilă: dacă a fost publicată în altă țară, sau dacă a fost publicată prima oară după 1996 (chiar dacă a fost realizată mai demult!): pentru asta ne trebuie o oarecare trasabilitate a imaginii, ceea ce nu putem infera despre nicio imagine găsită oriunde pe Internet. Iar dacă avem îndoieli, nu încărcăm imaginile.  —Andrei^talk 13:51, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:CamGen.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:CamGen.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Castillo blanco (talk) 13:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Detail of Krunisanje Cara Dušana by Paja Jovanović.jpg

File:Detail of Krunisanje Cara Dušana by Paja Jovanović.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:23, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected file:Arcul de triumf panorama 1.1.jpg. Taivo (talk) 18:47, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Eroare

Salut Andrei! Imaginea File:Ion Budai-Deleanu.jpg este un portret al lui Inocentiu Micu-Klein din sec. al 19-lea. Din eroare fisierul a fost incarcat drept "Ioan Budai-Deleanu". Am solicitat redenumirea fisierului, dar un habarnist a zis ca e bine asa. In consecinta te rog pe tine sa remediezi situatia. --Mihai Andrei (talk) 17:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

File:RO IF Mogosoaia Brancoveanu statue.jpg

File:RO IF Mogosoaia Brancoveanu statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mihai (talk) 16:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Septembrie 2019: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România!

Primiți acest mesaj deoarece ați participat anterior la concursul Wiki Loves Monuments România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

File:SiegeOfHulst.jpg

File:SiegeOfHulst.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:George Lahovari.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:George Lahovari.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:George Lahovari.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Gikü (talk) 14:29, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Vokzal hodoriv.jpg

File:Vokzal hodoriv.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Ирука¹³ 16:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Purgly and horthy.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Purgly and horthy.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Regasterios (talk) 19:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Casa Asigurării Meșteșugarilor.JPG

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Casa Asigurării Meșteșugarilor.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Casa Asigurării Meșteșugarilor.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Gikü (talk) 16:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Septembrie 2020: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România!

Deși trecem prin momente dificile în aceste vremuri imprevizibile generate de pandemia de COVID-19, competiția Wiki Loves Monuments are loc și anul acesta, implicit și în România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Întrucât o carantină nu este programată în România, puteți să ieșiți în continuare să faceți fotografii - luând toate măsurile de siguranță recomandate de autoritățile locale de sănătate. Dacă preferați să evitați ieșirile, cu siguranță aveți fotografii cu monumente înregistrate pe calculator din ultima călătorie! Aceasta este o oportunitate excelentă de a le oferi o a doua viață prin concursului Wiki Loves Monuments. Pe lângă faptul că vor fi vizibile pentru toată lumea, fotografiile dumneavoastră ar putea reprezenta România în competiția internațională. De asemenea ele pot apărea în diverse articole la Wikipedia și pot contribui la conservarea online a patrimoniului cultural și istoric al României.

Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes vă dorim și să vă bucurați, în condiții de siguranță, de patrimoniul care vă înconjoară!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

TUSC token 9980292bd45b7466534f77f944d5ffe7

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sighisoara - covered staircase - inside view.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sighisoara - covered staircase - inside view.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinaia steam engine 230039 cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

File:RO B Union Square Unirea Shopping Center.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RO B Union Square Unirea Shopping Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Multumesc

Legea este interpretabila,trebuie inregistrata,platesti anual taxa ca la masina,in plus ei iti vor monta un chip ca sa stie in permanenta unde te afli cu drona.dar nu este o lege finalizata.Riscul de a te amenda este foarte mare! Sper ca am te-am ajutat!

File:RO MM Sapanta Peri monastery 1.jpg

File:RO MM Sapanta Peri monastery 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Torre 381.40 Mod. 1914 - batteria amalfi.jpg

File:Torre 381.40 Mod. 1914 - batteria amalfi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 23:15, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:FoP-Romania

Category:FoP-Romania has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ox1997cow (talk) 17:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:McDonald's Timisoara..jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:16, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

File:ROU AR Arad CoA1.png

File:ROU AR Arad CoA1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 09:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

File:ROU BT Botosani CoA.jpg

File:ROU BT Botosani CoA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 20:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Caporetto - sacrario.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 03:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Platforma Cotmeana.png

And also:

• File:Dealurile Argesului.png
• File:Podisul Candesti.png

Yours sincerely,   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 10:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RO IF Pantelimon lake mute swan head in wings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 18:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RO IF Pantelimon lake mute swan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:RO HR Miercurea Ciuc Roman Catholic Church 1.jpg

And also:

• File:RO HR Miercurea Ciuc Roman Catholic Church 2.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:RO MS TgM national theatre.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:RO GJ Tg Jiu Endless Column park.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Fantana Modurei reconstituire de Ionel Stoicescu dupa originalul lui Constantin Baraschi.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:RO HR Odorheiu Secuiesc Tamasi Aron statue.jpg

Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 19:06, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:RO B Carol Park monument 2.jpg

And also:

• File:RO B Carol Park monument.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

File:RO AB Albac Horea statue.jpg

File:RO AB Albac Horea statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:RO B Hristo Botev 1.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

File:RO GJ Tg Jiu Endless Column park.jpg

File:RO GJ Tg Jiu Endless Column park.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:RO B Gold block.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:RO PH Ploiesti St John the Baptist Cathedral.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:RO PH Ploiesti Halele centrale 1.jpg

And also:

• File:RO PH Ploiesti halele centrale.jpg
• File:RO PH Ploiesti Turn hale.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)