Angela Huster

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Angela Huster!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 16:09, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Angela Huster!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Image:Info-Tafel am ehemaligen Marienheim.jpg was uncategorized on 3 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Kaufbeuren, Gartenstrasse 30, St Ulrich.jpg edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:56, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Kaufbeuren Neugablonz Christuskirche.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Kaufbeuren Neugablonz Christuskirche.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Chris.urs-o (talk) 18:54, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Kats, und so edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Angela, wollte Bescheid sagen, dass ich demnächst die von Dir angelegte Kat. Category:Waters in Kaufbeuren nach Category:Bodies of water in Kaufbeuren oder Category:Geography of Kaufbeuren umbenennen werde. "Waters in <Stadt>" gibt es nämlich nur sehr wenige, die Kats für Gewässer, und das ist ja gemeint, heißen hier alle "Bodies of water". (Ich selber hatte nicht die geringste Ahnung, wie Gewässer auf englisch heißt.) Ansonsten klappt es ja schon ganz gut bei Dir mit dem Kategorisieren, da brauch ich nicht mehr soviel dazu sagen. Auch ein paar Edit-Vorlagen von mir scheinst Du prima aufgenommen zu haben :-) Nur mit den Straßen-Kats in so Dörfern wie Irsee weiß ich nicht, ob das die Übersichtlichkeit nicht doch ein wenig beeinträchtigt, wenn man zwischen lauter Mini-Kats hin-und-her-klicken muss. Nach meiner Ansicht könnte man sich dort die Straßenkategorie ohne weiteres sparen und die Gebäude gleich alle in eine Kat. Buildings einsortieren. Eine Kat. kann bis zu 200 Unterkats und Bilder aufnehmen, ohne einen Seitenumbruch zu erzeugen. Ich weiß ja nicht, was Du in Irsee noch vorhast, aber ich denke, es ist nicht nötig, Bilder von Gebäuden einzustellen, die keine Baudenkmäler sind oder öffentliche Funktion haben, also z.B. normale Wohnhäuser. Die könnten im Prinzip zwar auch rein (hier gibt es keine Relevanzkriterien), aber das sollten wir nach meinem Dafürhalten lieber Google-Streetview überlassen. Außerdem sind Streets und Buildings im Kategorienbaum unterschiedliche Äste, weswegen sie nicht gemischt werden sollten (wie momentan in KF) und die Gebäude-Kats dann ggf. auf der untersten Ebene in beide einsortiert werden (Streets gehören zum Verkehr und Buildings zur Architektur). Ich hoffe, es ist klar, was gemeint ist. Ich misch' mich normal bei den fleißig Schaffenden vor Ort nicht ein, aber nachdem das eye, das ich auf Deine Arbeit geworfen hatte, nicht so schlecht ankam, mach ich mal ne Ausnahme… In diesem Sinne, Grüße ins Ostallgäu, --Gras-Ober (talk) 16:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nun, Gras-Ober, ich hatte einen guten Lehrmeister. So ein "eye" mit - auch geäußertem! - Dank wertzuschätzen, war Bestandteil seiner basic lessons. - Man könnte meinen, ich hätte "Rivers of Babylon" im Kopf gehabt, als ich mich für "Waters of..." entschied, aber ich muss diese Bezeichnung wohl doch irgendwo abgekupfert haben. Ah, es muss Leipzig gewesen sein. - Hab mir, was Du planst, eben am Beispiel Londons angeschaut. Ja, macht Sinn. "Bodies of" wirkt umfassender als das pure "waters". - Irsee (schon wieder was mit Wasser) soll kein größeres Projekt werden als die Baudenkmäler hergeben. Na, bis auf ein paar Ausnahmen vielleicht. Grundsätzlich seh ich das wie Du, dass Oma ihr klein' Häuschen nicht unbedingt in den Commons zu finden sein muss. In die Kaufbeurer Kategorien bin ich mit meinem Foto-Beginn so reingerutscht. Ich kam gar nicht auf die Idee, da etwas zu hinterfragen. Ich muss mir das alles nochmal ansehen. - Also - danke für Deine freundliche Unterstützung! Gruß aus KF, Angela Huster (talk) 15:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Guter Lehrmeister, das kann man so sagen. Aber da kam noch was dazu. Und London ist ein prima Referenzobjekt für Kaufbeuren ;-) Aber, um wieder auf das Thema zurückzukommen, mir ist inzwischen eingefallen, wie man obig beschriebenes Problem unkompliziert beheben kann: Die Kategorien müssten Buildings in ...straße of Kaufbeuren (oder Buildings in ...straße (Kaufbeuren)) heißen. Diese könnten dann systematisch korrekt in Buildings- und in Street-Kats eingeordnet werden. Hab' ich zwar hier noch nicht gesehen, könnte man aber trotzdem so machen, weil es logisch und konsequent ist. Ist im Prinzip dasselbe wie Buildings in <Stadtteil>, wie die Bauwerke bisher schon zusammengefasst werden. Werde mich mal mit dem Ersteller der Straßen-Kats in KF dazu beraten. Und mit den Waters in KF werde ich mich nächste Woche befassen. Vielleicht sind ja dann schon wieder mehr Bilder drin… Grüße aus der Landeshauptstadt, --Gras-Ober (talk) 10:49, 6 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 17:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Hagebuttenmark.jpg edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Hagebuttenmark.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kelly (talk) 11:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Altenbrak Wasserbruecke 1950er.jpg edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Altenbrak Wasserbruecke 1950er.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Vahurzpu (talk) 04:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Upload Genehmigung Migebert edit

Latest comment: 8 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Benutzer Migebert darf in meinem Auftrag von mir angefertigte Bilder nach Commons hochladen. Diese Dateien werden ohne Einschränkung wie meine bisherigen eigenen Uploads unter der Creative-Commons-Lizenz „CC0 1.0 Verzicht auf das Copyright“ zur Verfügung gestellt. --Angela Huster (talk) 08:37, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Vielen Dank, ich werde Deine Bilder bald hochladen und auf diese Genehmigung hier verweisen. Viele Grüße! Migebert (talk) 09:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ganz lieben Dank für Anregung und Ausführung! Beste Grüße, Angela Angela Huster (talk) 08:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Produkte der Allgäuland-Käsereien GmbH.jpg

Yours sincerely, Komarof (talk) 07:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Neugablonz, Herz-Jesu-Kirche (2).JPG edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Neugablonz, Herz-Jesu-Kirche (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 11:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic