User talk:Arnomane

Return to "Arnomane" page.

Old archived discussions can be found at Archiv-1, Archiv-2, Archiv-3 and Archiv-4.


please can you fix Multilanguage?Edit

For MW1.17? click here, thanks. Davecotter (talk) 06:15, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Sorry for my late answer. Of course I still exist. :-) and am also occasionally active here and there...
The Multilang extension was a quick and dirty hack but a very easy and practical thing, which I hoped others would replace with even better ideas (I also simply needed a break from Wikimedia universe). In the meantime I was busy with other things and didn't pay much attention to Wikimedia Commons, MediaWiki and Wikipedia anylonger... However I filled even a bug report on the issue, which documents the whole topic quite good: bugzilla:8287. As also can be seen from the bug report a very, very, very ugly hack with lots of ParserFunction voodoo and a special switch variable {{int:Lang}} was integrated into Wikimedia Commons. It works - but only for experts (which is also the opnion of other commenters at the bug report).
So I will have a look at the extension and the current MediaWiki version (hopefully this weekend), why it doesn't work anylonger together. I can't promise anything but at least the extension seems to be more popular than I have thought and thus worth a try to fix it. :-)
Happy new year, Arnomane (talk) 09:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Is there any chance for fixing multilang?Edit

Some changes were made at http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/extensions/Multilang/ so the extension doesnt cause any errors at least. But it still displays nothing with Mediawiki 1.18+...

Commons:CommonistEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Commons:Commonist has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

166.147.104.177 15:33, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Last modified on 14 August 2013, at 15:33