User talk:Augustgeyler/Archive 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwei Blattsalate der Sorte Lollo Rosso auf dem Linke Hof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ein Blattsalat der Sorte Lollo Rosso auf dem Linke Hof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griff einer Geldkassette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 01:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kürbisse auf dem Linke Hof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharp, no CA, no noise just taken with natural light under demeter standards. --Der Angemeldete 10:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserturm Engelsdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wohnhaus und Scheune – Johannes-Kamprath-Weg 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferienhaus Glöckner in Holzhau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrenhaus Rechenberg im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Comment dust in the sky and a bit noisy, but OK. --Rjcastillo 01:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchturmuhr der Kirche Rechenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnüberführung des Leipziger Güterrings über die Rietschke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 00:13, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterlandschaft mit altem Weg von Rechenberg nach Holzhau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detail of a water trailer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kriegsdenkmal in Rechenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltepunkt Rechenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldweg mit Tierfährten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Historische Holzverkleidung Wohnhaus – Alte Straße 79 - Giebel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberschloss Kranichfeld – Spiegelung eines Turmes der Vorburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Interesting image, though not 100 % sharp. Half of the credit goes to the window cleaner. --Der Angemeldete 16:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Historische Holzverkleidung Wohnhaus – Alte Straße 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blätter vom Roten Mangold (Chard).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lampenputzergras im Schrebergarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Friedrich-Dittes-Straße 8 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Theodor-Neubauer-Straße 21 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Gleismagnet 500 Hz

Soll ich Dir dieses Bild ausdrehen? Das ist kein Problem, doch bräuchte ich es dafür nicht verlustbehaftet datenreduziert. An einer jpeg-Kopie herummurksen ist genau das. –Falk2 (talk) 16:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltepunkt Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf – neu eröffneter Mittelbahnsteig am westlichen Gleis (Detail).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltepunkt Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf – im Bau bedindlicher Personentunnel (Südende).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltepunkt Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf – im Bau bedindliches östliches Gleis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltepunkt Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf – Baustelle der östlichen Eisenbahnüberführung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Richtungsgleis zwischen Hp Anger-Crottendorf und Bf Leipzig-Stötteritz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schild des Kleingartenvereins Reichsbahn Anger eV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltepunkt Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf – im Bau befindlicher Mittelbahnsteig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltepunkt Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf – neu eröffneter Mittelbahnsteig am westlichen Gleis (nah).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernwärmeleitung über der Zweinaundorfer Straße Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwei Eisenbahnüberführungen in der Zweinaundorfer Straße im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbartstraße mit Blick zur Mierendorffstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abgestelltes Kinder-Laufrad (nah).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltepunkt Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf – im Bau bedindlicher Mittelbahnsteig mit Personentunnel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 01:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltepunkt Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf – neu eröffneter Mittelbahnsteig am westlichen Gleis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 01:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Zweinaundorfer Straße 61 – Detail des linken Ladenlokals (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abgestelltes Kinder-Laufrad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick vom Heinrich-Heine-Park in Halle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Lehmann in der Abenddämmerung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Multiple dwelling Herbartstraße 4.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Karl-Härting-Straße 16 - Zweenfurther Straße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Karl-Härting-Str. 16 - ehemaliger Ladeneingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Karl-Härting-Str. 16 ehemaliger Hauseingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberschloss Kranichfeld Vorhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice composition. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberschloss Kranichfeld – Eingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:53, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberschloss Kranichfeld - Detail der Außenmauer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 02:55, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberschloss Kranichfeld – Erker mit Wappen und Blick auf Ilmtal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schulgebäude – Ihmelstraße 14 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bauende eines neuen Streckenabschnittes mit Betonschwellen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please have a look to the verticals. (The buildings in the background.) --XRay 07:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)  Thank you.  Done --Augustgeyler 09:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thank you. --XRay 06:55, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Sellerhäuser Straße 9 (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is color noise which needs to be removed (see especially the sky) --FlocciNivis 09:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)  Comment  Done --Augustgeyler 01:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality now --FlocciNivis 11:09, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbartstraße in Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:16, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilmtal bei Hetschburg mit Zug der Erfurter Bahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:13, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway bridge Zweinaundorfer Straße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eingang des Hotels Auersberg Haus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleine Fichte auf dem Auersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 23:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Auersberg Haus im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 23:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auersbergturm im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eingefrorenes Außenthermometer 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC) Could the file name be corrected? --Der Angemeldete 23:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)  Thank you.  Done --Augustgeyler 23:38, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltepunkt Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf – PKW am Baugleis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The object itself comes close to an image of Alexander-93. The story behind is nothing but shocking. What a scoundrel! What an evil crime! Imprison this construction site worker and never let him out! (licence plate is still recognizable btw...) --Der Angemeldete 13:36, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cultural heritage monument – Karl-Härting-Straße 16 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schriftzug am Auersberg Haus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking shelter »Großer Stern« near Eibenstock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Auersberg Haus mit Winterdienst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussicht auf Talsperre Sosa im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auersberghaus und Radaranlage im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wanderwegmarkierung am Auersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main entrance of Oberschloss Kranichfeld at Gatehouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Postgasse (Bern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:06, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elektrikerbetrieb in der Postgasse (Bern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerechtigkeitsgasse (Bern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altstadt Bern (Südostseite).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:06, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stationäres Fernglas am Aussichtspunkt Auersberg im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick vom Gurtenturm (Köniz) zum Berner Münster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bernisches Historisches Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice Picture. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:46, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brückenportal der Nydeggbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:40, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundeshaus in Bern 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Gurten nach Südosten 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Gurten nach Südosten 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dach der Französischen Kirche (Bern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mehrfamilienhaus – Herrnhuter Straße 1 (Leipzig) – Fenster mit historischem Rolladen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mehrfamilienhaus – Herrnhuter Straße 1 (Leipzig) – Fenster mit historischem Rolladen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinkwasserwagen auf dem Gurten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cine Rex (Bern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it needs a crop, see note --Ezarate 14:51, 18 March 2023 (UTC)  Thank you.  Done --Augustgeyler 17:39, 18 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality! Ezarate 22:46, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanierung der Eisenbahnüberführung Theodor-Neubauer-Straße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 08:44, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Auersberg Haus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question What is notable about this hotel? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:46, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is a cultural heritage monument at the second highest mountain in Saxony, Germany. --August Geyler (talk) 18:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support I agree that it's best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bern – Historisches Wohn- und Geschäftshaus – Nydeggasse 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tram (Straßenbahn) des Typs Tram 2000 in Bern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Erlenweg 18 (Bern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Erlenweg 20 (Bern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Türme des Parlamentsgebäudes in Bern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:54, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of Gurtendörfli (Switzerland).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Public transport shelter at Rechenberg halt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 20:10, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose I cannot see how this bus shelter is a valuable scope. Charlesjsharp (talk)
  •  Comment This is not a bus shelter but a traditional wooden shelter on the Nossen - Most railway line (connecting Saxony and Bohemia) from 1873. --August Geyler (talk) 19:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment It doesn't look like much. Is there anything other than the Rechenberg sign that makes its appearance distinctive, compared to other similar wooden shelters? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you for asking, Ikan. Special about this kind of shelters is just that they where typical for rail infrastructure in Saxony in the early days. But the one in Rechenberg is not special to the others, beside the fact that most others did not survive. Today, it is the only exemplar of this kind on this railway line. In general I don't understand the point of your and Charlesjsharp's review. The scope is not "Classic railway shelters in Europe" but "Public transport shelter at Rechenberg halt". I simply thought the nominated image shows the shelter at Rechenberg at best. Your question surprised me because we are promoting hundreds of images of ordinary cars as VI every month. And nobody is asking: What makes this Audi A3 special compared to all other 600.000 produced same Audi A3 vehicles? --August Geyler (talk) 09:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

 Comment We have scopes for every type of car (usually two), but not for cars in specific locations or in special livery - exceptions for race cars, special museums etc. So the scope has to be for a specific type of shelter and the image has to be the best in the scope, irrespective of railway line. But only if the shelter is distinctive in some way.
The scope defines a generic field or category within which the image is the most valuable example. The scope must be broad enough to be realistically useful to somebody who wishes to search the VI repository.
Here is what the guidelines say about structures: Not any church is worth a Valued Image scope. Cathedral scopes are OK, but for other churches there should be a good reason, like being a pilgrimage place, being really famous, being architecturally exceptional... Christian architecture is taken as an example, but the same general rule applies to religious buildings of any religion.
As you may guess, my opinion is that we are ignoring this guideline and allowing too many scopes of ordinary structures and pieces of them, like a doorway. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Question August Geyler, thanks for your answer. How many extant shelters are essentially identical in appearance to this one? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:59, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment At this line it is the only one. As this small buildings where constructed in the early days of rail transport, they usually where constructed separately by every line / railway company. Due to their wooden nature, they had to be rebuild from time to time. I don't know any exact same surviving shelter. On normal gauge railways, like in Rechenberg, they are extremely rare. A few similar but smaller or differently shaped shelters have survived or been rebuild on some narrow gauge railways in Saxony. I try to give an overview (only one normal gauge example I could find):

• 
  Cossmannsdorf at Weißeritztalbahn
• 
  Seifersdorf at Weißeritztalbahn
• 
  Hartmannmühle at Müglitztalbahn (normal gauge)
• 
  Johnsdorf at Zittauer Schmalspurbahn
• 
  Weißes Roß at Lößnitzgrundbahn

They are all shaped differentially, referring to local architecture traditions and special needs of the specific railway line. Most of them are classified as cultural heritage monuments. --August Geyler (talk) 21:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Since it's a bit different from the other extant shelters and historical, I can see how it could have a use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick vom Gurtenturm (Köniz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Firchtenzweig auf dem Auersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:13, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Herrnhuter Straße 2 (monochrom).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question An impressive shot, but there is visible noise on the sky. Could you correct it? --LexKurochkin 19:37, 22 March 2023 (UTC) Fixed  Thank you. I did reduce the noise. --Augustgeyler 20:33, 22 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Very good now. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 06:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical roller shutters from the period of historicism in Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• should be cropped to show shutters. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
  • They are shown already, aren't they? --August Geyler (talk) 22:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support The wide shot shows the context which is also interesting and is very well explained in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fassadenverkleidung einer Turnhalle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metalltor – Herbartstraße 2d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torhaus Zweinaundorfer Straße 55-59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eingang Torhaus Zweinaundorfer Straße 55-59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franckestraße (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostwache Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:39, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fundament zur Errichtung einer Treppenanlage zum Parkbogen Ost 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:39, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fundament zur Errichtung einer Treppenanlage zum Parkbogen Ost 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fundament zur Errichtung einer Treppenanlage zum Parkbogen Ost 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:39, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinderkrippe Theodor-Neubauer-Straße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Sorry, I didn't ask, but I hope renaming was OK. --XRay 03:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)  Comment  Thank you. --Augustgeyler 10:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:CH.GR.Arosa Tschuggen-Grand-Hotel 2220 16x9-R 16K.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CH.GR.Arosa Tschuggen-Grand-Hotel 2220 16x9-R 16K.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fundament zur Errichtung einer Treppenanlage zum Parkbogen Ost.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:10, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theodor-Neubauer-Straße 45-65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fußgängerbrücke Theodor-Neubauer-Straße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baumwurzeln in einem Container.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:10, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Maschinenfabrik Karl Krause (Sanierung 2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:33, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ostwache Leipzig.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spielplatz Volkshain-Stünz – Rutsche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spielplatz Volkshain-Stünz – Rutsche (Detail).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Theodor-Neubauer-Straße 62-66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spielplatz Volkshain-Stünz – Klangufo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natursteinmauerwerk – EÜ Theodor-Neubauer-Straße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stahlbetonbau am Haltepunkt Anger-Crottendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brückenbau am Haltepunkt Anger-Crottendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans-Sachs-Straße in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spielplatz Volkshain-Stünz – Klettergerüst zum Hangeln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:56, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neubausiedlung Theodor-Neubauer-Straße 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wichernstraße - Richtung Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 17:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbachstraße (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Theodor-Neubauer-Straße 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stegerwaldstraße in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinderkrippe Theodor-Neubauer-Straße – Südseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

--Pi bot (talk) 07:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ladengeschäft – Zweinaundorfer Straße 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:04, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Täubchenweg 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kippenbergstraße (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 17:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M018F077 Kassettendecke im Portikus – Haus der Kunst – München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M019F001 Deckenlicht im Vulkan im Wörlitzer Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Oberschloss Kranichfeld – Eingang.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oberschloss Kranichfeld – Eingang.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blockheizkraftwerk Leipzig Möckern – Nordfassade mit Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Florstein 12:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blockheizkraftwerk Leipzig Möckern – Nordfassade mit Esse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (A little bit dark and very minor CAs. But OK.) --XRay 13:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blockheizkraftwerk Leipzig Möckern – Nordfassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Florstein 12:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M020F031 Neue Hütte (Schmalkalden).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Bildentfernung

Sorry, seit wann ist es regelwidrig, ein eigenens & neu bearbeites Bild hochzuladen und unter einer Photo-challenge einzustellen ? - Bitte Ihre Entfernung meines Bildes unverzüglich wieder revertieren : https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3APhoto_challenge%2F2023_-_April_-_Looking_up&diff=prev&oldid=750912302&uselang=de&diffmode=source - andernfalls werte ich das als Vandalismus ! Gordito1869 (talk) 14:24, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Entschuldige bitte, ich wollte Dich nicht verärgern, glaubte hier einfach einen Fehler entdeckt zu haben. Teilnahmeberechtigt sind Fotos, die im Wettbewerbszeitraum hochgeladen worden. Dies bedeutet im Umkehrschluss, dass ein Foto, dass bereits vorher hochgeladen war, eben nicht teilnahmeberechtigt ist. Wenn Du weiterhin mit meiner Auffassung nicht einverstanden bist, wende Dich doch bitte direkt an die Organisatoren des Wettbewerbs und bitte um deren Beurteilung. August Geyler (talk) 14:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Nein, ich bin nicht einverstanden: Das Foto wurde im Wettbewerbszeitraum fototechnisch überarbeitet und aktuell hochgeladen; das ist dort gängige & mannigfach geübte Praxis seitens aller Teilnehmer. - Bei der überwiegenden Anzahl der Fotos handelt es sich ferner um Bilder, die weit außerhalb des aktuellen Wettbewerbs-Monats "geschossen" und aktuell neu hochgeladen wurden (teilweise uralte gescannte s/w Fotos); diese Fotos werden und wurden allesamt in den Challenges akzeptiert. - Bitte mein Foto wieder einstellen, sonst mache ich es selbst - unter dem Hinweis auf Vandalismus.--Gordito1869 (talk) 16:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC) ...hab´s selber wieder eingestellt : Bitte Vandalismus künftig unterlassen ! --Gordito1869 (talk) 16:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Ja, Bilder dürfen vorher "geschossen" worden sein. Du berücksichtigst jedoch nicht den hier vorliegenden Fall, in dem exakt dieses Bild bereits lange vor dem Wettbewerbszeitraum auf Commons hochgeladen war. Genau – und nur – das betrachte ich als Regelverstoß. Mein Revert ist also kein Vandalismus. August Geyler (talk) 16:37, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, dieses Kriterium gilt es einzuhalten : Photographs must be newly uploaded to Commons during the challenge submission period i.e. April 2023 UTC (but may have been taken earlier). - Dieses Kriterium ist hier eindeutig und nachweislich erfüllt - EOD von meiner Seite ! --Gordito1869 (talk) 16:41, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Die Aussage "newly uploaded" bedeutet meiner Einschätzung nach, dass es sich um neu hochgeladene Bilder handeln muss, im Sinne dass es eben keine Re-Uploads sind. Würde Deine Deutung zutreffen könnte man die ganze Regel auch einfach streichen. Durch einen simplen Re-Upload wäre dann jedes schon lange auf Commons vorhandene Bild teilnahmeberechtigt. August Geyler (talk) 16:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Nööh, die Einschätzung ist imho falsch und sämtliche challenges wären für`n Ar..., wenn alle "new uploaded" Fotos "posthum" gelöscht würden; bitte erst die aktuellen Regeln neu schreiben und erst dann revertieren, danke & nochmals EOD ...ps : mein zweites Foto stammt übrigens aus 2010 und ist sogar "an very excellent one" ! ... im Gegensatz zu einem unsäglich (!) manipulierten Qualitätsfoto (seagulls repositioned), das durch einen Dritten (imho unberechtigt) neu hochgeladen- und erfolgreich zur QS-Kandidatur gestellt wurde--Gordito1869 (talk) 16:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

ps : ...aber bitte nur keine Sorge : Meine eigenen & authentischen Fotos mit meiner billig-Knipse sind gegen die durch wahre & echte Commons-Titanen - wie konkret z.B. durch User:Alchemist-hp - höchstpersönlich manipulierten "echten Qualitätsfotos" ohnehin völlig chancenlos. - Wenn solche fremd-manipulierten- aber dafür echten & authentischen Qualitäts-Fotos künftig auch noch ausschließlich durch künstliche Intelligenz (KI) erzeugt werden, braucht man - zum großen Glück bei den Foto-Challenges - auch keine eigene Fischkisten-Knipse mehr physisch mit rumschleppen; das ist doch herrlich, oder ? - Commons "pictures of the year", authentisch erschaffen & authetisch manipuliert durch KI !!! - Tschüss --Gordito1869 (talk) 06:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC) (meine Photos habe ich gem. Ihrer adminstrativen Vorgaben aus der aktuellen Challenge wieder entfernt : https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Photo_challenge/2023_-_April_-_Looking_up&action=history ... ich hoffe Sie sind nun zufrieden mit Ihrem Ergebnis. --Gordito1869 (talk) 06:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Was habe ich verpasst? Diskutierst Du hier gerade mit Dir selber? August Geyler (talk) 07:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

...ganz genau, wer sich selbst zum Foto-Admin erhebt - ohne offenbar Foto-Admin zu sein - und fremde Fotos ohne vorherige Disk. entfernt, mit dem kann & will man nicht "diskutieren".- Tschüss --2003:ED:D706:DB10:3892:1A8E:EB52:483 10:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Mann o Mann, das angesprochene Bild habe ich am 1. Apr. 2012 nach Bearbeitung neu hochgeladen. Und es wird mir immer noch nachgetragen. Jeder darf Fotos die auf Commons liegen nach belieben neu bearbeiten und unter gleichen Lizenzbedingungen hochladen. Wer das nicht möchte, der darf eben KEINE Fotos mehr auf Commons hochladen! Ist das soweit verstanden? Ferner habe ich ja beim neu hoch geladenem Bild die "Manipulation" erwähnt und auf das Original verlinkt. Erkläre mir ferner was ist Manipulation? Bereits das erstellen eine Fotos mit einer x-beliebigen Kamera ist eine Manipulation der Wirklichkeit. Auch das Nachbearbeiten von Fotos ist eine Manipulation. Wo fängt bei Dir eine "Manipulation" an und wo hört sie auf? Jeder hat da seine eigene Grenze. Ist das auch soweit verstanden? VG --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:13, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Darum ging es überhaupt nicht. Das Thema hier dreht sich nur um Wettbewerbsteilnahmen. August Geyler (talk) 12:26, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Danke, ich weiß, ich wollte nur User:Gordito1869 antworten! VG, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:44, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Achso. Danke. August Geyler (talk) 22:50, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwei Fohlen auf Bauernhof in Baalsdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of historic blast furnaces at Neue Hütte – south side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment There are two different views of this building that can both be promoted: the front side and the back side. it would be good to add to the scope the direction of the shooting to differentiate them. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Done --August Geyler (talk) 18:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:03, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruhnsstraße (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaußiger Straße (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Emmausstraße 17 – Hauseingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engelmannstraße (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Portitzer Straße 2 – Hauseingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peilickestraße (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handschwengelpumpe Bruhnsstraße – Detail vom oberen Sockel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handschwengelpumpe in Leipzig Sellerhausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernwärmeleitungen am Leipziger Güterring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Cunnersdorfer Straße 7 – Hauseingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really good. -- Ikan Kekek 01:18, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruhnsstraße (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaußiger Straße (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Emmausstraße 17 – Hauseingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engelmannstraße (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Portitzer Straße 2 – Hauseingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peilickestraße (Leipzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handschwengelpumpe Bruhnsstraße – Detail vom oberen Sockel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handschwengelpumpe in Leipzig Sellerhausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernwärmeleitungen am Leipziger Güterring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Cunnersdorfer Straße 7 – Hauseingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really good. -- Ikan Kekek 01:18, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wurzner Straße in Leipzig Sellerhausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhauszeile Wurzner Straße 119 - 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Wurzner Straße 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:16, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus Wurzner Straße 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:16, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turm der Trinitatiskirche mit Straßenbaustelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehrfamilienhaus – Sellerhäuser Straße 7 (Leipzig) – Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lärmschutzwand Sockelplatten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wurzner Straße mit Emmauskirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Supports Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sportplatz in Leipzig Sellerhausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:52, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Sellerhäuser Viadukt zur Emmauskirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle Parkbogen Ost – Viadukt Sellerhausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle Parkbogen Ost – Rampe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bellis perennis – Flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mehrfamilienhaus Cunnersdorfer Straße 7 – Hauseingang.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mehrfamilienhaus Cunnersdorfer Straße 7 – Hauseingang.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lärmschutzwand Sockelplatte – Typenschild.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:CH.BE.Boenigen 2021-08-15 Seaplane-Meeting 5426 16x9-R 7680x4320.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CH.BE.Boenigen 2021-08-15 Seaplane-Meeting 5426 16x9-R 7680x4320.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick vom Gurtenturm (Köniz) auf den Park im Grünen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Achszähler im Baustellenbereich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)