Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Austrianbird!

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open! edit

 

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Austrianbird,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Random attacks edit

First of all, vandalism is an action consciously and deliberately done to harm the project, not edits you don’t like. Never use the V-word in the context like Revision of User_talk:Tm; see w:WP:NOTVAND for details. Second, you may not order anybody on this site to “stay away” from anything. You have no necessary authority, first and foremost. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Warning edit

Stop edit warring now. (e.g. here). Jcb (talk) 18:38, 12 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please sign your postings edit

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
 
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 05:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

COM:ANU edit

Hi, I am raising a thread on COM:ANU with regard to your recent dispute with Tm. Tm has been similarly advised, please discuss on COM:ANU rather than making further remarks on Tm's talk page which are clearly unwelcome. Thanks -- (talk) 08:47, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your account has been blocked edit

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Also, insults, like in this edit comment is completely unacceptable. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


Hundertemale hab ich user tm erklärt worum es geht, immer wieder und wieder. Wie kann es sein das ein User dutzende Male Artikel ändert ohne jedes Fachwissen? Und nun werden Spezialisten auf dem Gebiet für eine Woche gesperrt? Weshalb? Weil tm absolut kein Wissen hat über das Thema und im Gegensatz zu mir kein Wort Polnisch spricht aber ständig Artikel verändert? Schon alleine die absurde und unrichtige Überschrift "User Austrianbird and the Polish POW photo" zeigt wie hirnlos man hier agiert! Welches POW/ Kriegsgefangenenfoto? Da geht´s um ein Foto welches verurteilte ehemalige Aufseherinnen, einen SS-Mann und polnsiche Kapos zeigt und für ihre Taten hingerichtet wurden, und nicht um irgendwelche Kriegsgefangenen!!! Aber Hauptsache man sperrt halt einen User weil man gerade nichts besseres zu tun hat. Wie lächerlich seid ihr eigentlich??? Und dann steht da noch das Johann Pauls mit dem niedrigsten Unteroffiziersrang einen ganzen Totenkopfsturmbann kommandiert hat (chief of the guards)!? Auch ein völliger Blödsinn, er war Kommandoführer des Waldkommandos aber nicht Kommandant aller SS-Männer im KL Stutthof. Wie ungebildet muß man nur sein dies überhaupt nur in Erwägung zu ziehen das ein Unteroffizier der Kommandant über 3 Kompanien ist!? Aber Unrichtigkeiten zu verbreiten scheint hier wohl das Ziel zu sein. Man muß sich fragen warum der User tm nicht gesperrt wurde für seinen ständigen Vandalismus!? Kann wohl nur Freunderlwirtschaft sein alles andere wäre unlogisch. Gleiches gilt für die Bescheinigung die tm dutzende Male verändert hat ohne überhaupt fähig zu sein zu lesen was da auf dem Formular steht. Hauptsache er hat seinen Spaß daran es dauernd zu ändern. Einfach nur bedauerlich. User Srittau gehört blockiert für sein subjektives Verhalten bzw. als Admin abgesetzt. Und zu dem Typen (glaublich User Jcae) der da suggeriert das hat irgendetwas mit Polnischen Konzentrationslagern zu tun kann ich nur eines sagen:; Mein Beileid. Fachwissen null aber großartig maulen." Kein Wunder, ist ja ebenfals aus Portugal wie User tm. Austrianbird (talk) 10:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

This project is overwhelmingly run by non-experts and generalists, just like me. Haranguing fellow volunteers only creates a hostile environment where people are simply going to avoid the topic rather than assisting with improving it. Making the distinction between "functional prisoners" or prisoners of war who became "civilian workers" during WW2 and other prisoners of war is fine, but this can be a matter of logical discussion and evidence rather that revert warring and ad hominem language.
For controversial topics like this, it is simpler to leave it to the related Wikipedia articles on the topic and keep the description with the photographs as short and non-controversial as possible. As Wikipedia will already have thrashed out the debate and presented a neutral point of view article, there is no benefit in repeating the debates on Commons with a significantly smaller community to express alternate views.
As the versions of pl:Stutthof (KL) and related articles vary in content by language, it may be worthwhile linking to several as variations in presentation, and probably making the issues more accessible for different audiences of reuser.
If you want to make a generic proposal to consistently change language for all photographs with identified Kapos in them, your next step after being unblocked could usefully be to make a short and neutrally worded proposal at COM:VP or COM:VPP. With a consensus supporting the change, there will be no need for disputes or reverts.
Thanks -- (talk) 11:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply