Bankotravel~commonswiki

Image Tagging Image:LordHalifax.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LordHalifax.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson 20:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Fair use

Hi, please do not upload screenshots from BBC and claim they are fair use. You may find that such images are deleted very quickly. Please only upload media that can the copyright owner allows anybody to use for any purpose. Thuresson 20:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Prośba

Ale o jaką grafikę chodzi?:) ABach 11:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Psie Pole - herb

Witaj, dziękuję za link, znam tą grafikę, na niej właśnie się opierałem. Co do wstążki na szyi to raczej mam wątpliwości, moim zdaniem wygląda to na obrożę, zwłaszcza że wstążka na psiej szyji w herbie średniowiecznego pochodzenia byłaby raczej anachronizmem. Zresztą są (późniejsze) przedstawienia herbu bez obroży - [1]. Skoro mieszkasz we Wrocławiu może uda Ci się dotrzeć do żródłowych opisów herbu, albo innych starszych wizerunków. Ten który zrobiłem oparłem na jedynych dwóch wizerunkach które znalazłem, i kilku opisach. Sądzę, że jest poprawny, bo oba wizerunki i opisy są zgodne co do zasadniczych elementów herbu. W heraldyce jest dozwolona pewna własna, artystyczna interpretacja, byle efekt był zgodny z opisem herbu. W tym przypadku w znalezionych opisach nie jest określona ani rasa psa ani to czy ma obrożę. Są to drugorzędne szczegóły, podobnie jak w herbie Polski różnie bywał przedstwiany np. ogon orła, ułożenie skrzydeł czy kształt dzioba.

Trochę ważniejszą rzeczą jest umieszczana niekiedy na tarczy data bitwy (legendarnej lub faktycznej) - 1109. Gdyby udało Ci się dotrzeć do jakichś wiarygodnych materiałów w archiwach na ten temat, to byłbym wdzięczny za wiadomość.

Co do kształtu tarczy, to taki mnie się bardziej podoba, i jest zresztą dość powszechny na wikipedii. Jest to kształt tarczy gotyckiej, a więc właściwy dla sredniowiecznego herbu. Tarcze o półokrągłym zakończeniu spopularyzowała heraldyka miejscka XX w. Są również dopuszczalne i zgodne z regułami, ale mniej klasyczne. Herb można umieszczać na tarczy dowolnego kształtu, o ile nie jest w herbowym nadaniu zaznaczone, że ma być stosowany tylko jeden kształt, a to raczej rzadko bywało.

pozdrawiam --Steifer 17:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Frankfort.jpg

Do you really think, this Picture is free content? I can't belive it. Marcus Cyron

Image Tagging Image:Frankfort.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Frankfort.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Porsche logo.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Porsche logo.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Hautala 15:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Opis edycji

Witaj! Bardzo jestem ciekaw, co też mogłeś mieć na myśli opisując tę edycję? //kapacytron (talk) 02:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Picture of Perca fluviatilis

Hello, there is still problem with Image:Perca fluviatilis by Bankotravel.jpg. I found it in the book printed before Wiki was founded and there is writen that author of this and other pictures of fishes is Fritz Wendler. So I cannot believe that you are the author or copyright holder and that is why this picture could not be used on Wikis. There is no way to revert the deletion requests or new uploadings. You can only prove in the discussion that you hold the rights to this picture or that using this picture is not permitted. Thank you. --Reaperman 22:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove the deletion tag while the deletion is still discussed. If you disagree with the deletion request, add your opinion on the respective discussion page: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Perca fluviatilis by Bankotravel.jpg. --Mormegil 20:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:James_Alfred_Ewing.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:James_Alfred_Ewing.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:James_Alfred_Ewing.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 15:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Bankotravel~commonswiki!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 07:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Oscar Lenz.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

File:Monument_Charles_de_Gaulle_in_Warsaw.jpg

File:Monument_Charles_de_Gaulle_in_Warsaw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cezarika1 (talk) 08:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mikhoels_in_January_1948.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mikhoels_in_January_1948.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mikhoels_in_January_1948.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 21:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Bankotravel. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Bankotravel~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

19:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

02:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Zemu-gap.jpg

File:Zemu-gap.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)