Bodo Kubrak

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bodo Kubrak!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Bodo Kubrak!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Grundriss der Marthakirche.jpg was uncategorized on 27 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Hauptportal der Mathakirche.jpg was uncategorized on 1 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Rechte Empore Tabor-Kirche (Berlin-Kreuzberg).JPG was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Orgel Tabor-Kirche (Berlin-Kreuzberg).JPG was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Kanzel Tabor-Kirche (Berlin-Kreuzberg).JPG was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Altarbild.JPG was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Linke Empore Tabor-Kirche (Berlin-Kreuzberg).JPG was uncategorized on 9 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Grundriss der Lindenkirche.jpg was uncategorized on 20 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Hauptgiebel der Lindenkirche.jpg was uncategorized on 20 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Lindenkirche.jpg was uncategorized on 20 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Entwurf für das Pfarrhaus der Marthakirche.jpg was uncategorized on 23 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Ernst Badstübner.jpg was uncategorized on 27 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Altarbild.JPG

File:Altarbild.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 15:38, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Category:Church

Hallo Bodo Kubrak, du hast gestern in eigene deiner hochgeladenen Bilder [[:Category:Church]] eingefügt. Das ist wahrscheinlich gut gemeint gewesen, aber dennoch musste ich fast alle rückgängig machen, denn die Bilder waren alle schon in Kategorien einsortiert, die wiederum Unterkategorien von "Churches" sind. Bilder sollten immer nur so tief wie möglich einsortiert sein. Verstehst du, was ich meine?

Nur die Bilder der Lindenkirche und der Grunewaldkirche waren noch in keiner Kirchenkategorie - dort war deine Einsortierung grob richtig. Ich habe dort die Einsortierung nur präzisiert.

Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 14:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Saibo, leider hatte ich das Kategorisieren nicht richtig verstanden bzw. übersehen, dass die Bilder inzwischen von einem Könner kategorisiert worden sind. Dafür vielen Dank. Ich werde versuchen, mich zu bessern. Insbesondere weiß ich oft nicht weiter, wenn ich einen Fehler entdecke (siehe meine Diskussion auf "Liste Berliner Sakralbauten".--Bodo Kubrak (talk) 11:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Bodo Kubrak, kein Problem. Damit hat fast jeder am Anfang Schwierigkeiten. Schaue einfach, dass du nicht noch "Church" zu einem Bild hinzufügst, obwohl es schon in einer Kirchenkategorie ist. Das Kategoriesystem ist nämlich wie ein Stammbaum aufgebaut. Beispielsweise ist die Kategorie "Martin-Luther-Kirche Musterhausen" ein Kind von "Churches in Germany" und jenes wiederum ein Kind von "Churches". So vielleicht verständlich ausgedrückt. Wenn du mal etwas falsch hinzufügst, ist es aber auch kein Problem. Das Entfernen geht ganz schnell für erfahrene Benutzer.

In de:Liste Berliner Sakralbauten hast du alles richtig gemacht, so wie ich sehe. Einzig der Link auf "Vater-Unser-Kirche (Berlin-Charlottenburg)" war nicht zwingend zu verbessern, denn er war ja blau, weil es eine Weiterleitung auf den richtigen Artikel ist. In den meisten Fällen verbessert man soetwas nur nebenher, weil es ja nichts macht, dass es so ist (der Leser kommt ja trotzdem an das Ziel). Es gibt sogar Fälle in denen Links auf Weiterleitungen bestehen bleiben sollten: das ist immer dann der Fall, wenn eine Weiterleitung auf einen Sammelartikel verweist wo aber denkbar ist, dass in Zukunft der verlinkte Teil in einen eigenen Artikel ausgelagert wird. Hier in deinem Fall war das aber nicht so.

Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:13, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Foto vom Landhaus Woringer

Herzlichen Dank für das Einstellen von http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hagenstraße_3_Berlin-Grunewald.jpg Das Hochschularchiv Aachen war schon seit Wochen auf der Suche nach einem Farbfoto dieses von Eugen Confeld von Velbert geschaffenem Gebäude, das dann auch in einer im Juli eröffneten kleinen Präsentation Verwendung finden wird. Grüße --Historiograf (talk) 10:48, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Bodo Kubrak, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 22:15, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Philippus-Kirche (Berlin) Kirchraum.JPG

Hallo Bodo, um den Urheberrechtsstatus dieses und der anderen Fotos aus der Kirche beurteilen zu können, benötigen wir die Namen der Urheber der Originale, also für die Buntglaswand und für die Orgel, z.B. --Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Hallo, die Namen der Urheber der Originale sind mir nicht bekannt. Mich interessiert nicht das bunte Glas, sondern die Architektur der Kirche. Viele Grüße --Bodo Kubrak (talk) 16:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Es geht hierbei nicht um dein (oder mein) Interesse, sondern darum dass in Deutschland Innenraumwerke nicht durch die Panoramafreiheit abgedeckt sind, ergo die Fotos das Urheberrecht der Künstler/Architekten verletzen, sofern diese nicht bereits 70 Jahre tot sind. --Túrelio (talk) 16:19, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Ich will versuchen, den Kirchraum abends zu fotografieren, sodass kein Licht von außen auf das Fenster fällt und Details des Bundglasfensters nicht zu erkennen sind. Bodo Kubrak (talk) 06:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Die Alternative wäre, zu versuchen, den noch lebenden Architekten zu kontaktieren und um Erlaubnis zu fragen. Er sollte ja durchaus ein Interesse habe, dass sein Werk (sofern das auch für die Glaswand gilt) in der Wikipedia dargestellt wird. --Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Die Glaswand stammt von Florian Breuer (1914-1994). In einem anderen Fall habe ich mich bemüht, die Erlaubnis des Urheberrechtsträgers zu erhalten. Man hat auf meine Anfrage leider nicht reagiert. Diese vergebliche Mühe mache ich mir nicht noch ein Mal. Ich bezweifele, dass sich die Verfasser der Prospekte, die in der Kirche ausliegen, und die diese Altarwand auch zeigen, die Erlaubnis geholt haben.--93.219.28.163 15:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Philippus-Kirche (Berlin) Kirchraum.JPG

File:Philippus-Kirche (Berlin) Kirchraum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 16:37, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Es geht mir nicht um die Löschung, sofern vermeidbar, sondern um die Klärung des Legalität des Fotos. --Túrelio (talk) 16:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Lukas-Kirche Altar früher.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lukas-Kirche Altar früher.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 12:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Lukas-Kirche früher.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lukas-Kirche früher.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 12:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo Bodo Kubrak,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Benediktinerstraße 12 (Berlin-Frohnau)

Hallo,

bei Deinen Fotos aus der Benediktinerstraße ist ein bisschen was durcheinander gekommen:

File:Benediktinerstraße 32 (Berlin-Frohnau).JPG -> ist tatsächlich die 12, habe eine Verschiebung beauftragt.

File:Benediktinerstraße 12 (Berlin-Frohnau).JPG -> ist ganz sicher nicht die 12 (aber auch nicht die 32). Mir kommt das Haus bekannt vor, allerdings fällt mir die richtige Adresse nicht ein.

Kannst Du es aus Deinen Erinnerungen oder Aufzeichnungen vielleicht korrigieren? Viele Grüße, Andre de (talk) 20:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC) Hallo Andre de, das Haus ist nicht die Nr. 12 in der Benediktinerstraße, sondern eine Nr. 3A einer mir unbekannten Straße. Viele Grüße --Bodo Kubrak (talk) 18:07, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Nun, bis dahin war ich schon, die "3A" ist ja auf dem Foto zu erkennen. Meine Frage war, ob Du Dich vielleicht erinnerst, welche Straßen Du abgelaufen bist. In Frohnau gibt es aber kein Denkmal mit der Hausnummer 3A, sodas das Bild ggf. komplett irrelevant ist. Trotzdem danke, Andre de (talk) 21:38, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Andre de, die 3A bezieht sich auf das hinten liegende Haus. Ich bin leider etwas durcheinander gekommen, versuche aber es zu korrigieren. Es handelt sich rechts von der Toreifahrt um das Baudenkmal Tannenstraße 5. Was ich dort eingefügt habe, muss ich noch klären. Viele Grüße --Bodo Kubrak (talk) 18:07, 27 December 2014 (UTC) Hallo Andre de, in der Tannenstraße 5 habe ich irrtümlich das Baudenkmal Karmeliterweg 9 eingefügt. Viele Grüße --Bodo Kubrak (talk) 19:01, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Danke für die Aufklärung und Korrektur! Ich habe jetzt noch die Dateibeschreibungen und Denkmal-IDs berichtigt. Viele Grüße, Andre de (talk) 22:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Schellbronner Weg (Berlin-Lübars).JPG

Hallo, Habe das Kennzeichen vom oben genannten Bild entfernt da sich der Eigentümer via OTRS beschwert hat. Beste grüße, --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Bodo Kubrak,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Austausch über Probleme von Wiki-Startern beim Kategorisieren?

Lieber Bodo Kubrak, das Bild der Schilfdachkapelle in Berlin-Kladow hat mich auf Ihre Seite geführt (tolles Engagement, die Lücken gezielt aufzufüllen!), da ich aus der Region bin und neugierig war, ob es jemand ebenfalls aus der Region ist, der/die da fotografiert. Nun bemerke ich, dass Sie bei Fotos für Wiki Commons genau wie ich über das Kategoriesystem "gestolpert" sind, das ich sehr benutzerunfreundlich finde, da weder die Systematik im Eingabefeld erkennbar wird (sondern nur extern auf der Kategorieseite) noch beim Eingeben einer Kategorie sinnvolle Vorschläge ähnlicher vorhandener Kategorien angezeigt werden. So muss immer von Erfahrenen nachgearbeitet werden - Zeit, die m.E. an anderer Stelle besser investiert wäre. Ich beschäftige mich gerade mit Ursachen, warum es für neuere Leute bei Wikipedia und Wiki Commons nicht immer leicht ist - falls Sie da mit Ihren eigenen Erfahrungen oder Anregungen daraus helfen könnten, was anders sein müsste, wäre ich Ihnen sehr dankbar und freue mich auf eine Nachricht. Beste Grüße --Polimorph (talk) 09:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Lieber Polimorph, mit Kategorien lebe ich schon immer auf Kriegsfuß. Zur Zeit fotografiere ich Kulturdenkmale in Prenzlauer Berg. Als Kategorie wähle ich "Cultural heritage monuments in Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg". Ob weitere Kategorien erforderlich sind, übersteigt meine Fähigkeiten. Viele Grüße Bodo Kubrak--Bodo Kubrak (talk) 07:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Kategorien Baudenkmale Hann. Münden

Hallo Bodo Kubrak, Du hast etliche Bilder in die Kuturdenkmal-Kategorie von Hann. Münden eingefügt. Bitte bedenke, dass zahlreiche Einzelgebäude-Kategorien (z.B. Ochsenkopf, Werrabrücke, Welfenschloss etc.) bereits in diese Kategorie einsortiert sind und es so zu Doppelungen kommt. Gibt es irgendwo einen Beschluss, dass die einzelnen Bilder entgegen dem üblichen Vorgehen bei Kategorien trotzdem zusätzlich direkt in die Kulturdenkmal-Kategorie einsorteiert werden sollen (oder dass die Einzelobjekt-Kategorien aus dieser zu entfernen wären)? Daran müsste ich mich dann erst mal gewöhnen. --Dehio (talk) 14:18, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Dehio, ich beabsichtige bei meinem Urlaub in Hann. Münden Baudenkmale zu fotografieren und hochzuladen. Eine andere Kategorie als "Cultural heritage monuments in Hann. Münden" fällt mir nicht ein. Keine Kategorie zu wählen, wurde beanstandet. Ich lebe zwar mit Kategorien auf dem Kriegsfuß, ich habe es aber bisher so verstanden, dass durchaus mehrere Kategorien gewählt werden können. Gruß--Bodo Kubrak (talk) 14:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Bodo Kubrak, vielen Dank für die Antwort. Und besonders vielen Dank für die Ergänzung der Denkmalliste und die Fotos! Ich persönlich befürchte ja, wer das Kategoriensystem bei Commons volständig durchblickt, muss irgendeinen größeren geistigen Schaden haben oder so ... deshalb dachte ich auch, es gäbe vielleicht irgendeine Regel, die ich wieder nicht kenne. Nach meinem Verständnis (das leider nicht sehr weit reicht) sollte jedes Bild in mindestens eine Kategorie einsortiert werden. Bei Baudenkmalen ist "Cultural heritage monuments in Hann. Münden" erstmal gut. Idealer- und utopischerweise sollte jedes Bild in alle passenden Kategorien einsortiert werden, aber jeweils nur in die spezifischsten. Was also in "Cultural heritage monuments in Hann. Münden" ist, soll nicht zusätzlich noch in "Cultural heritage monuments in Landkreis Göttingen" sein - das wäre sonst doppelt, weil das eine eine übergeordnete Kategorie zu der anderen ist. Wenn es für ein Einzelobjekt eine eigene Kategorie gibt, reicht es meist, nur diese Kategorie anzugeben, wenn das Bild genau dieses Objekt zeigt. Z.B. ist die Kategorie "Ochsenkopf" bereits als Kategorie in "Cultural heritage monuments in Hann. Münden", in "Timber framing (Hann. Münden)" und in "1520s timber framing in Lower Saxony" einsortiert. Die Bilder in der Kategorie "Ochsenkoppf" sollten diese drei Kategorien deshalb normalerweise nicht mehr aufweisen, es wäre sonst doppelt. Wenn Du Deine Bilder schwer kategorisieren kannst, dann finde ich es völlig ok mit der Kategorie "Cultural heritage monuments in Hann. Münden". Schwierigkeiten hatte ich, weil Du andere Bilder ebenfalls dort einsortiert hast, die darin bereits enthalten waren - über eine Unterkategorie. Was mein Bild betrifft, habe ich das einfach rückgängig gemacht. Ich wollte aber damit nicht gegen irgendeinen neuen Beschluss verstoßen und außerdem wollte ich vermeiden, dass Du mit viel Arbeit aus Versehen viele Bilder doppelt kategorisierst.

Vielen Dank für Deine Arbeit und lass Dich möglichst nicht abschrecken von dem System hier und den genervten Anfragen und Antworten. Andere sind halt mit dem Kategorisieren auch leicht am Ende der nervlichen Belastbarkeit.

Viele Grüße --Dehio (talk) 17:02, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo Bodo Kubrak!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

File:St. Petrus (Berlin-Wilmersdorf) Innen.JPG

File:St. Petrus (Berlin-Wilmersdorf) Innen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Code (talk) 08:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

File:St. Petrus (Berlin-Wilmersdorf) Empore.JPG

File:St. Petrus (Berlin-Wilmersdorf) Empore.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Code (talk) 08:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

File:St. Petrus (Berlin-Wilmersdorf) Orgelempore.JPG

File:St. Petrus (Berlin-Wilmersdorf) Orgelempore.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Code (talk) 08:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Code (talk) 08:31, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Apsis der Martin-Luther-Kirche (Berlin-Lichterfelde).jpg

File:Apsis der Martin-Luther-Kirche (Berlin-Lichterfelde).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Code (talk) 05:21, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Code (talk) 05:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Bodo Kubrak!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Fregestraße 19

Guten Tag,

wäre es möglich, ein Foto des geschichtsträchtigen Hauses Fregestraße 19, Berlin-Friedenau, bereitzustellen? Vielen Dank. --Zaunkoeniglich (talk) 10:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Hallo, das Foto steht in der Fregestraße in der Liste der Straßen und Plätze in Berlin-Friedenau. --Bodo Kubrak (talk) 14:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Ah, super! -Zaunkoeniglich (talk) 19:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Einladung zum Mitmachen bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017

Hallo Bodo Kubrak!

Vielleicht hast du es schon mitbekommen: Im Moment läuft – noch bis zum 30. September 2017 – der internationale Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos von Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen! Wie du mitmachen kannst erfährst du auf unserer Mitmach-Seite, bei Fragen und Problemen kannst du dich auf unserer Support-Seite melden.

(Martin Kraft im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 12:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC))

File:St. Richard (Berlin-Neukölln) Altarbereich.JPG

File:St. Richard (Berlin-Neukölln) Altarbereich.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: contemporary artwort, no fop in germany Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:35, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

File:St. Elisabeth (Berlin-Schöneberg) Elisabeth-Altar.jpg

File:St. Elisabeth (Berlin-Schöneberg) Elisabeth-Altar.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: artist died in 2005, no op in germany Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Am Birkenhügel 6 (Berlin-Wannsee).jpg

File:Am Birkenhügel 6 (Berlin-Wannsee).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:EC:CBE6:E900:4DD4:29CB:E362:F653 07:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Hallo Bodo Kubrak,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:27, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Bitte kein Kategorien-Doppelungen

Hallo Bodo, wenn du Kategorien neu anlegst/umbenennst, dann wäre es nett die alte auch aus den Bildern zu entfernen und ein REDIRECT anzulegen. Es macht wenig Sinn, zwei identische Kategorien zu behalten, in der jeweils alle Bilder eingeordnet sind. --Arnd (talk) 09:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Arnd, ich habe die Kategorie:St. Johannes (Dreitzsch) wieder entfernt. Gruß--Bodo Kubrak (talk) 09:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Hallo nochmal Bodo, ich verstehe nicht ganz was du machst. Es gibt jetzt Category:Protestant Church (Altenbeuthen) und Category:Dorfkirche Altenbeuthen. Wofür? Bitte benenne die Kategorie vollständig um oder belasse es bei der vorhandenen. In Zukunft wird sowieso per Wikidata jede Kategorie mit Zusatzinformationen angereichert. Der Kategorienname spielt dann keine besondere Rolle mehr, da Wikidata auch Bezeichungen in mehreren Sprachen unterstützt. Damit ist eine konkrete Kategorie nur eine Art Kästchen, in dem alles dazu passende gesammelt wird. Viele Grüße, --Arnd (talk) 18:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Fürbitt-Kirche (Berlin-Britz) Altarbereich.jpg

File:Fürbitt-Kirche (Berlin-Britz) Altarbereich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Fürbitt-Kirche (Berlin-Britz) Orgel.jpg

File:Fürbitt-Kirche (Berlin-Britz) Orgel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Mariä Himmelfahrt (Berlin-Kladow) Tabernakel.jpg

File:Mariä Himmelfahrt (Berlin-Kladow) Tabernakel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:07, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Mariä Himmelfahrt (Berlin-Kladow) Taufkapelle.jpg

File:Mariä Himmelfahrt (Berlin-Kladow) Taufkapelle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Mariä Himmelfahrt (Berlin-Kladow) Ambo.jpg

File:Mariä Himmelfahrt (Berlin-Kladow) Ambo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Eben-Ezer-Kapelle (Berlin-Lichterfelde) Altarraum.jpg

File:Eben-Ezer-Kapelle (Berlin-Lichterfelde) Altarraum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:15, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Korneliuskirche (Berlin-Wedding) Orgelempore.JPG

File:Korneliuskirche (Berlin-Wedding) Orgelempore.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:20, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:St. Bernhard-Kirche (Tegel) Altarbereich.jpg

File:St. Bernhard-Kirche (Tegel) Altarbereich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Kirche der Christengemeinschaft (Berlin-Wilmersdorf) Kirchraum.JPG

File:Kirche der Christengemeinschaft (Berlin-Wilmersdorf) Kirchraum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:31, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Philippus-Kirche (Berlin) Eingangshalle.JPG

And also:

• File:Philippus-Kirche (Berlin) Kirchenschiff.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:33, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Sühne-Christi-Kirche Inneres.jpg

File:Sühne-Christi-Kirche Inneres.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:41, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Petrus-Kirche (Berlin-Spandau) Fensterwand.JPG

File:Petrus-Kirche (Berlin-Spandau) Fensterwand.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:42, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Petrus-Kirche (Berlin-Spandau) Gemeindesaal.JPG

File:Petrus-Kirche (Berlin-Spandau) Gemeindesaal.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:42, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Christuskirche (Berlin-Kreuzberg) Altarraum.jpg

File:Christuskirche (Berlin-Kreuzberg) Altarraum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Christuskirche (Berlin-Kreuzberg) Empore.jpg

File:Christuskirche (Berlin-Kreuzberg) Empore.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:St. Joseph (Berlin-Rudow) Kapelle.JPG

File:St. Joseph (Berlin-Rudow) Kapelle.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:45, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Jonakirche (Berlin) Altarraum nordost.JPG

And also:

• File:Jonakirche (Berlin) Altarraum südost.JPG
• File:Jonakirche (Berlin) Bühne.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:St. Wilhelm-Kirche (Berlin) Altarbereich.JPG

File:St. Wilhelm-Kirche (Berlin) Altarbereich.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Martin-Luther-Kirche Altar.jpg

File:Martin-Luther-Kirche Altar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:51, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Martin-Luther-Kirche Orgel 1909.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Martin-Luther-Kirche Orgel 1909.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Martin-Luther-Kirche Orgel 1909.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Martin-Luther-Kirche Orgel 1909.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Martin-Luther-Kirche Orgel 1909.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Martin-Luther-Kirche Orgel 1909.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Im Fischgrund 45 (Berlin-Frohnau).JPG

File:Im Fischgrund 45 (Berlin-Frohnau).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mussklprozz (talk) 07:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Mussklprozz, ich weiß leider nicht, wie ich mich an der Diskussion beteiligen soll. Leider ist es mir aus gesundheitlichen Gründen nicht möglich, die örtlichen Verhältnisse zu erkunden. Private Grundstücke betrete ich beim Fotografieren nicht. Auf dem Foto erkenne auch nicht das Gegenteil. Gruß --Bodo Kubrak (talk) 11:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Bodo, zunächst einmal gesundheitlich alles Gute für Dich, was auch immer es sei, und nach Möglichkeit gute Besserung. – Mir schien es nach Ansicht der Karte und aufgrund der Perspektive möglich, dass Du näher an das Haus herangerückt bist, als es die öffentliche Straße zuließ. Wenn Du in der Löschdiskussion kurz schreiben könntest, dass mein Eindruck falsch ist, und von wo ungefähr Du das Foto gemacht hast, trüge wohl die Antragstellerin die Beweislast. – Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 12:36, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Mussklprozz, ich habe mir die Straße auf OpenStreetMap angeschaut. Mein Standort hatte etwa die Koordinaten NS=52.62996 EW=13.30412. Die Bäume im Vordergrund zeigen mir, dass ich nicht auf dem Grundstück war. Gruß--Bodo Kubrak (talk) 13:20, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Pauluskirche Chor.jpg

File:Pauluskirche Chor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Orgelbilder

Hallo, Du hast es wahrscheinlich gesehen: habe einige Deiner Emporenbilder zugeschnitten, um die Orgel hervorzuheben - fändest Du es sinnvoll, diese statt Deiner auf der Liste der Berliner Orgeln zu verwenden? Einige habe ich schon ausgewechselt, aber mir ist es eigentlich egal, und die Cropps kann man sicher auch sonst mal brauchen (zB auf organindex). Und bearbeitet habe ich sie manchmal auch, mag nicht immer optimal sein, kann man ja aber mit der Zeit mit Drüberladen verbessern.. Grüße, --Subbass1 (talk) 10:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:St. Crucis-Kirche (Bad Sooden-Allendorf) Apsis.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 11:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Nummernschild, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lützowstraße_51C-D_(Berlin-Tiergarten).jpg

Lieber Bodo Kubrak, auf dem Bild, das Sie vom Haus in der Lützowstraße 51C–D eingestellt haben, ist das Nummernschild des davor parkenden Wagens deutlich zu erkennen, siehe hier. Man kann dadurch recht schnell identifizieren, wer dort wohnt. Könnten Sie das Nummernschild auf Ihrem Foto bitte unkenntlich machen oder den unteren Rand des Fotos abschneiden, damit das Nummernschild nicht sichtbar ist? Vielen Dank und beste Grüße,--Ururfaust (talk) 12:17, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Hallo, mein Versuch, den unteren Bildrand abzuschneiden, ist leider gescheitert. Viele Grüße Bodo Kubrak (talk) 13:13, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Ihren Versuch. Ich habe das Foto nun selbst zugeschnitten. Beste Grüße,--Ururfaust (talk) 20:13, 20 March 2022 (UTC)