Last modified on 16 May 2013, at 15:16

User talk:Bunks

Return to "Bunks" page.
Babel user information
de-N Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.
pt-3 Este utilizador pode contribuir com um nível avançado de português.
en-3 This user has advanced knowledge of English.
es-1 Este usuario tiene un conocimiento básico del español.
Users by language

Who am I?/¿Quién soy?Edit

I'm the same admin Bunks on de:. I use this same username on all the projects that I register in. At WWW.flickr.com my user name is "Afrobrasil" At www.fotocommunity.de my user name is also "Bunks" and "Afrobrasil"

Image:Sines_houses.JPGEdit

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore

Dear orgullomoore, this foto received a worldwide free license "public Domain" because I have produced the foto. It is also published under my name Bunks Afrobrasil in Flickr. Therefore no Copyright violation possible --Bunks 15 November 2007

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Bunks!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 08:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, PigeonIP (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC) PigeonIP (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

You have doubts that my foto File:CF Saboia.jpg qualify for scientific, educational or cultural purposes. Here is my response:

1. I never take a foto without asking the persons, if it is such a type of portrait. I hate it by myself if somebody takes a foto of me without asking. Therefore I can garantee that for this photo I did ask the persons directly in the moment. This was some time ago (2001). 2. In the backgroud you see a big Azulejo painting (typical portuguese tile artwork). I was informed before in 2001 that this station will be totally renewed and the wall tiles will be taken away. So it was nearly the last oportunity to take a photo of this wonderful tile paintings. For your information some months later the whole south portuguese railway line was renewed (intercity connection) and all old railway station buildings were restructured or demolished. The historic clock shown at the upper side of the photo has also been taken away. This was my main motivation to take the photo and it was worthwhile. It took during these years hundreds of photos from other CF stations in Portugal (if you follow my fotos in Wikimedia), which today do not exist anymore in this shown format. Especially if ornaments (like these tiles) and some architectural structures have been taken away/or were modernized. The only reason for taking the photo with the people was the fact that they were sitting there in front of the tiles. The real object of the photo are the tiles and the historic clock and not the people in front. From a later foto which I found on Flickr it turns out that the above mentioned about 80 years old clock was exchanged agains a modern model lateron. http://www.flickr.com/photos/pgarte/3654777897/ From the above information it is obvious that there is of course a high scientific and cultural purpose to keep this foto in Wikimedia.Bunks (talk) 16:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)