User talk:Carschten/Archive/Promotions/2018

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien, Karlsplatz, 2017-11 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qualit high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 22:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien, Linke Wienzeile 42, 2017-10 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not sure, maybe a a slight CA on the roof on the right. Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baroque house “Zum weißen Raben”, Rheinberg (nightly illumination).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Central nave inside Nikolaikapelle, Obermarsberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipe organ (1707) of Stiftskirche St. Peter und Paul, Obermarsberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:00, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buttenturm, Obermarsberg (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful used best in scope. PumpkinSky talk 01:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heckrath-Haus, Moers (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question - OK, it's on a list of Baudenkmäler in Moers, but what's its claim to fame or notability? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

The house is a cultural heritage monument and because of that it's used in the list in the German Wikipedia. As far as I know it's enough for an own scope here at VIC. The detailed monument index card isn't published on the internet, so I don't know something about the building, just that it's the former agricultural school. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 17:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria are met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Support - I agree. Former agricultural school that's a cultural heritage monument is a useful scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
“Schwarzer Adler”, Rheinberg-Vierbaum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Balabinrm (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:33, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamper Hof, Rheinberg (east view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zollturm, Rheinberg (southwest view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spanischer Vallan, Rheinberg (southwest view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alte Meidericher Glocke (1487), Duisburg-Mittelmeiderich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church tower of Evangelische Kirche Meiderich, Duisburg-Mittelmeiderich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Choir of St. Suitbertus, Düsseldorf-Kaiserswerth.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Die Trauernde (1962) by Willy Meller in Oberhausen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Hüls, St. Cyriakus, 2012-09 CN-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Hüls, St. Cyriakus, 2012-09 CN-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Hüls, St. Cyriakus, 2012-09 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Hüls, St. Cyriakus, 2012-09 CN-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Hüls, St. Cyriakus, 2012-09 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:40, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Hüls, St. Cyriakus, 2012-09 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. For some reason the windows are not as sharp as the rest but still o.k. --Ermell 19:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Hüls, St. Cyriakus, 2012-09 CN-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 07:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abteikirche Kamp, Kamp-Lintfort (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Maria von der Immerwährenden Hilfe, Marsberg-Helminghausen (southeast view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sozialamt Gelsenkirchen (east facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial and sculpture of Arnold Janssen in St. Maria Magdalena, Goch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Only one reference category is sufficient. On the other hand, the sculptor is not mentioned neither in the scope nor in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Info You're right, I changed the scope from “Memorial to Arnold Janssen in St. Maria Magdalena, Goch” to “Memorial and sculpture of Arnold Janssen in St. Maria Magdalena, Goch”. Even after a longer time of searching, I didn't find something about the sculptor. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 12:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kervenheim Castle (“Haus Kervendonk”), Kevelaer (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --El Grafo (talk) 16:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:46, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War I & II memorial, Krefeld-Traar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:46, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Heinrich, Krefeld-Uerdingen (east view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:46, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heiligenhäuschen at Rather Straße, Krefeld-Traar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bilsteinturm, Marsberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Matthias, Krefeld-Hohenbudberg (southeast view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:19, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Josef, Krefeld-Traar (south view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Distortion problem --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

  @Archaeodontosaurus: as it's a panorama, a little distortion is inevitable. Depending on the projection, either the building is curved or the tower is a bit distorted. I uploaded a new version, I'm not really sure which one is better. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 09:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Support This version is better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:50, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Düsseldorf, Kaiserswerth, Diakonie, 2011-10 CN-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 23:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Winkmannshof, 2014-09 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 00:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moers, Terheydenhaus, 2011-09 CN-01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Traar, St. Josef, 2011-08 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 19:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of St. Petrus, Padberg, Marsberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment But far too dark, @Carschten: . Charles (talk) 08:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

  it was really dark inside the church, but nevertheless the image was underexposed. I tried a correction, @Charlesjsharp:  Done. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 00:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

• thanks. Charles (talk) 14:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery chapel at Rheinberger Straße, Moers (north view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altes Hafthaus (Old Detention Building), Moers (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kreisständehaus, Moers (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of the Pilsum Church, Pilsum, Krummhörn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment it might be helpful to straighten the walls --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

   Done --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 00:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Rheintor, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:33, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Am Zollhof, Lagerhalle, 2011-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough, perspective well done, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gelsenkirchen, City-Wohnanlage, 2016-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Burgstraße 21a, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 20:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gelsenkirchen, Rolandstraße 14, 2016-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 21:03, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Abwasserkanal, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, 2018-08 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The entire series of five photos is well done. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, 2018-08 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 02:48, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Dom, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Capitol, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 02:48, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 02:48, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentor, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentor, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Handwerkerhäuser, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Handwerkerhäuser, 2018-08 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 10:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Molenturm, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I can forgive the sign, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:20, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altena, Burg, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:22, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altena, Burg, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altena, Burg, 2018-02 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altena, Burg, 2018-02 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Herberge, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Herberge, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Matronentempel, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Matronentempel, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Molenturm, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 11:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Hafentempel, 2018-08 CN-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haus Neuhofs, Krefeld-Uerdingen (west view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Michael, Krefeld-Uerdingen (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station building of the Krefeld-Uerdingen railway station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rheintor (“Rhine Gate”), Krefeld-Uerdingen (closed, city side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altena, Burg, 2018-02 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altena, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Bahnhof, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Bahnhof, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Stadtmauer, Nordwestturm, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Stadtmauer, Nordwestturm, 2018-02 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, could be a bit sharper --Sixflashphoto 01:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Stadtmauer, Nordwestturm, 2018-02 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Michaelskirche, 2018-02 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Michaelskirche, 2018-02 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Haus Neuhofs, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Stadtmauer, Nordwestturm, 2018-02 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 15:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Michaelskirche, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Michaelskirche, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Stadtmauer, Nordwestturm, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Sharpness could be better.) --XRay 05:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Stadtmauer, Nordwestturm, 2018-02 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Sharpness could be better.) --XRay 05:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Haus Neuhofs, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Haus Neuhofs, 2018-02 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice to see the change of perspective in comparison to the version with moderate wide angle lens! Very useful. --Smial 10:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Bügeleisen, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 11:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Bügeleisen, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 17:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Bügeleisen, 2018-02 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 17:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Anna, Krefeld-Inrath (east facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Ezarateesteban 20:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:32, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wasserturm an der Gutenbergstraße, Krefeld-Kempener Feld (view from the northwest).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:32, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Zollamt, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Kempener Allee 9, 2018-07 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Kempener Allee 9, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Kempener Allee 9, 2018-07 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Bügeleisen, 2018-02 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:45, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Gutenbergstraße, Wasserturm, 2018-07 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:14, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Landgericht, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Stadthaus, 2018-07 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Stadthaus, 2018-07 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 14:27, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Stadthaus, 2018-07 CN-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Acceptable for QI. IMO sharpness could be better. --XRay 12:27, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Graf-Luitpold-Straße 6-8, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Vengolis 02:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Mühlenhaus, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Vengolis 02:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Vengolis 02:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Vengolis 02:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Vengolis 02:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, Offizierskasino, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I prefer a building that is not under construction --Michielverbeek 13:28, 14 September 2018 (UTC) Me too, but sometimes it's unavoidable (and I prefer a construction instead of an abandoned monument) and for QI it isn't important :) --Carschten 13:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, Offizierskasino, 2018-07 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, Offizierskasino, 2018-07 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Gutenbergstraße 39, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Mariae Rosenkranz, Mülheim an der Ruhr-Styrum (southwest facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:08, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mühlenhaus, Rheinberg-Ossenberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schlosskapelle Ossenberg, Rheinberg (view from the east).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:11, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former officers' mess of the Husarenkaserne Krefeld (view from the north).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:50, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Vengolis 05:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Vengolis 05:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Vengolis 05:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Schlosskapelle, 2018-04 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Mühlenhaus, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Martin, Hillesheim (exterior from the south).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Kempener Allee 9, Krefeld-Kempener Feld.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Customhouse of Uerdingen, Krefeld.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Graf-Luitpold-Straße 6-8, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Mühle, 2018-04 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Mühle, 2018-04 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Mühle, 2018-04 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, Mühle, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:15, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Protestant Luther Church with parish hall, Mülheim an der Ruhr-Speldorf (exterior from the south).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior with the choir of the Protestant Luther Church Speldorf, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main pipe organ (by Willi Peter in 1963) of the Protestant Luther Church Speldorf, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Side organ (by Willi Peter) in the right aisle, Protestant Luther Church Speldorf, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:16, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Gutenbergstraße 46, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
“Friedrichsthor” of Altena Castle (south facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:17, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
War memorial of Bönninghardt, Alpen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Central nave inside the Stiftskirche St. Peter und Paul, Obermarsberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Adámoz (talk) 16:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Kempener Allee, Kaserne, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Kempener Allee, Kaserne, 2018-07 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but composition could be better: A lot of grass in the foreground. Categorization could be better: Entrance, gate,... --XRay 14:52, 22 September 2018 (UTC)  Done improved categorization, thank you! The grass was part of the composition to show the neglected, abandoned situation, but I'm not sure if it's successful. --Carschten 18:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. --Rbrechko 11:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 15:56, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 12:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Rbrechko 14:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 14:51, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, St. Mariae Rosenkranz, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 15:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Speldorf, Lutherkirche, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why the second nomination? Charlesjsharp 08:20, 18 September 2018 (UTC) I don't understand what you mean, that are two different images. --Carschten 11:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC) We would normally just nominate the best one. Charlesjsharp 08:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC) I definitely disagree with that: You see two different images with two different compositions, one with the parish hall and one without. So both can be QI. --Carschten 16:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC) Nothing wrong with promoting multiple similar or nearly identical good quality images. This one needs a slight horizontal perspective correction --Trougnouf 17:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)  Done @Trougnouf: thank you for your feedback! I uploaded a new version. --Carschten 18:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thank you! --Trougnouf 00:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altar of the Protestant Luther Church Speldorf, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pulpit of the Protestant Luther Church Speldorf, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior with the organ gallery of the Protestant Luther Church of Speldorf, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canopy and entrance of Stadthaus Krefeld.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:38, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 22, 2018-04 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Hansastraße 19, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Hansastraße 19, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 26, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Hansastraße 29, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 22, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. --Rbrechko 13:31, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 22, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 14, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:56, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 14, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Prinzenhöhe 14, 2018-04 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Rbrechko 10:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:48, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House Graf-Luitpold-Straße 6/8, Rheinberg-Ossenberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wasserturm Vinn, Moers (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Überwasserkirche, Münster (exterior from the south).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Hansastraße 33, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 15:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Solbad Raffelberg, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:17, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Solbad Raffelberg, 2018-04 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 15:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Solbad Raffelberg, 2018-04 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:17, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Raffelbergpark, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Solbad Raffelberg, 2018-04 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Raffelbergpark, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Raffelbergpark, 2018-04 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, St. Mariä Himmelfahrt, 2018-04 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, St. Mariä Himmelfahrt, 2018-04 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, St. Mariä Himmelfahrt, 2018-04 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 09:39, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinberg, Ossenberg, St. Mariä Himmelfahrt, 2018-04 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, Solbad Raffelberg, 2018-04 CN-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:34, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, 2018-07 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good. --Rbrechko 09:40, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Central nave inside Überwasserkirche, Münster.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:41, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gutenbergstraße 41, Krefeld (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gutenbergstraße 39, Krefeld (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niederberg Coal Mine, shafts 1 and 2, Neukirchen-Vluyn (general view from the north).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Corneliusstift, 2018-07 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:53, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Corneliusstift, 2018-07 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:53, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, 2018-07 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:51, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, 2018-07 CN-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:26, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Niederstraße 36, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:09, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Corneliusstift, 2018-07 CN-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:19, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Corneliusstift, 2018-07 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:45, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gutenbergstraße 39, Krefeld (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support: Even though only two images exist in the scope so far, I think this comes very close to the best image of this building one can possibly take. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 08:13, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:27, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blaue Brücke/Styrumer Brücke, Mülheim an der Ruhr (view from the south).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support: This is the only image that shows the complete bridge, all other (currently available) images show only parts of it. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 08:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Art nouveau facade (1906) of the Wolfsburg, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support: Best image composition of all images in scope. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 08:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, 2018-07 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:52, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Niederstraße 20, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:21, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Bruchstraße 18, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Zur Krone, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 12:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Zur Krone, 2018-02 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Corneliusstift, 2018-07 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 05:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Husarenkaserne, 2018-07 CN-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:18, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Uerdingen, Mariensäule, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Siegfriedmühle, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haus Darup, Nottuln (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Neutral: Single image scope. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 12:09, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

  That isn't a reason not to support, on the contrary, especially because it's a building with high relevance. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 12:51, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

I believe that it is against the goal of VI to identify the most valued images of a scope when there are no other images in the scope. I do however see that there are other opinions here, and that's why I don't oppose, but I cast a neutral vote in such cases. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 14:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of St. Fabian und Sebastian, Nottuln-Darup.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support: The picture gives a good impression of the overall interior of the church. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 12:10, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alte Kellnerei, Rheinberg (exterior from the west).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support: Of several quite similar pictures, this is the only one which shows the whole building. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 12:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tor der Toten, Rheinberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question: Maybe you can add some comment about what you think makes this picture the most valuable image of the object, compared to for example this one. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 12:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

  To me it's the better image because it has a better view of the location (e.g. slightly higher than the surrounding) and it isn't hidden by trees. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 12:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. When I compare the two images, the other one has better colors, and I don't feel that the trees obstruct a relevant part of the monument; to the contrary it seems to me that the trees were placed with the aim to build an ensemble with the gate. I am really unsure which one is a more representative view of the monument, so I give it a  Neutral. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 13:58, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Stadtmauer, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Stadtmauer, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 02:56, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, RömerMuseum, 2018-08 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, RömerMuseum, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:56, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, RömerMuseum, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten, Archäologischer Park, Stadtmauer, 2018-08 CN-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marienkirche Woquard, Krummhörn (south facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Ezarateesteban 02:30, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:11, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior with the pipe organ of St. Johannes Nepomuk, Burgsteinfurt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:11, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pulpit of St. Maria Magdalena, Goch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:12, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former main building of the Hammann leather factory, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:12, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krefeld, Haus Rheinhorst, 2018-02 CN-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The foreground (wall, cars, posts) are a little bit disturbing. --XRay 07:11, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Half-timbered house Hansastraße 29, Mülheim an der Ruhr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Mariä Himmelfahrt, Rheinberg-Ossenberg (exterior from the north).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corneliusstift, Krefeld (main facade from the northwest).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niederstraße 36, Krefeld-Uerdingen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Quality image, well described and categorized, useful and used. Skimel (talk) 19:25, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zur Krone, Krefeld-Uerdingen (south facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful; beautiful image -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:58, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Casino, Krefeld-Uerdingen (exterior from the north).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:56, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haus Rheinhorst, Krefeld-Uerdingen (exterior from the northwest).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:00, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:12, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southeast tower of the city wall of Uerdingen in front of the former castle, Krefeld.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:12, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niederstraße 26, Krefeld-Uerdingen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niederstraße 20, Krefeld-Uerdingen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bruchstraße 18, Krefeld-Uerdingen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)