Cutlass

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Cutlass!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Special:diff/573302848

Hey. I could not think this file was taken by user because from exif info (author:Hetzark Segundo Wala kang jowa!; Copyright holder:(C)Hetzark Segundo 2020-SAGRA Aviation Photography). Why you think it is uploaer's own work? (^･ｪ･^) (talk) 00:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Username is the same as the copyright and isn't a brand new account, it has uploaded photos before and if he uploaded photos under a false name he would most likely just mass copyvio upload. This seems to be a photographer uploading select own work photos to Commons. --Cutlass^Ciera 00:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

username not exactly the same as exif author name. But combined with the previous photos, I believe that it is indeed the work of the uploader. (^･ｪ･^) (talk) 01:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Cutlass, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

rubin16 (talk) 05:39, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. rubin16 (talk) 05:39, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Reply to email

Hello! I still exist, just not with time for Wikipedia like I used to have. I do still see unusual cars periodically; the difference is just that I don't go around with my camera at all times as a primary hobby. That's the main trick: lots and lots of time! IFCAR (talk) 15:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

@IFCAR: Wow, awesome to see the legend is still here! Cutlass^Ciera 16:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Rolling_coal_(locomotives)

Category:Rolling_coal_(locomotives) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 21:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

NARA TIF files

Hello Cutlass,

NARA TIF files

Just an FYI re your categorization of this file: for files from NARA that have identical JPG (for article use) and TIF (lossless version for editing), only the JPG needs to be categorized. (See Category:NARA TIF images with categorized JPGs). This is per Fæ (see file history) and Pi.1415926535 for example. This avoids needless duplication of files in categories. Regards, Krok6kola (talk) 15:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

I know, that is why I reverted my edit right after publishing it. Cutlass^Ciera 16:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1991 Honda Civic STD Hatchback in Frost White, front right, 05-15-2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Casio F-91 W Fake or not.

Hi. User:Cutlass You are very vigilant. My Casio F-91W has the "U". It's so small I thought it was a scratch on the screen and touched it up. I'll probably swap out the photo. A "U" is actually visible under the magnifying glass.

[file:Counterfeit Casio F-91 W front closeup minor retouch.jpg|thumb|Casio F-91W]

I only have the watch out of sentimentality, without reading glasses I can't see the watch displays at all. Thanks.

--~~~~ VSchagow (talk) 14:10, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you and sorry for the late reply. I understand now. Have a nice day. Cutlass^Ciera 16:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Stop reverting back to an inferior version of Typhoon Rita

Could you please stop reverting back to an inferior version of File:Typhoon Rita 10-22.png we’ve had to remove your reverts multiple times at this point and it’s pretty much vandalism. Titiuss (talk) 00:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

You're a sock. Please stop socking. Thanks. Cutlass^Ciera 13:28, 31 March 2023 (UTC)