Cyberfoxy6
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:32, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 23:50, 1 October 2016 (UTC)== Copyright status: File:Tereshchenko family coat of arms.jpg ==
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Tereshchenko family coat of arms.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 07:07, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, JuTa! You're not going to believe it, but this is the first time I see these notifications, including yours :( I'm kinda new on Wikipedia and I thought I was doing everything right, but I'm blocked from editing and uploading..... I have a written permission to use this coat of arms photo, I believe I unluded this information in description, the author provided me this photo fo free usage, I can copy paste you the email. I always used photos I was given a permission to use, I admit, I might be wrong in dates, but some of the DELETED photos were so old...that I don't understand the reason for deletion. So, basically, all the photos were either old, or given me to use under permission. What do you think we can do about it? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberfoxy6 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 01 October 2016 (UTC)
--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 23:51, 1 October 2016 (UTC)== File:Tereshchenko Diamond.jpg ==
|
File:Tereshchenko Diamond.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cult of Green (talk) 01:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Sorry to hear this. I haven't seen these notifications earlier (yes, I'm a Wikipedia dummie)))) and newbie :) ) Please undelete it if possible. The photo has almost everyone, who is interested in rare diamonds and their history. But the most important, this diamond belongs to the Tereshchenko family, and was permitted to be in use. Please, write to me your thoughts and ideas, I'd love to resolve this misunderstanding :) Friendly, Cyberfoxy6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberfoxy6 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 01 October 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Tereshchenko family coat of arms.jpg edit
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tereshchenko family coat of arms.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tereshchenko family coat of arms.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
JuTa 07:57, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 23:52, 1 October 2016 (UTC)== Удаление ваших загрузок ==
|
Hello Cyberfoxy6.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
Добрый день. Посмотрел я ваши загрузки и решил большинство из них удалить. Вы взяли фотографии из всяких сайтов и загрузили в Викисклад, сказав, что они публикованы под свободной лицензии, но это неправда. Если истинные фотографы посылают OTRS-разрешение, тогда их можно восстановить. Очень старые фотографии могут быть в Викискладе, потому что их авторские права закончились. Для некоторых фотографии непонятпо, очень старые ли они или нет. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Europe's golden girl, Sofia Tereshchenko.jpg (480×600)
- File:Sofia Tereshchenko 2016.jpg (Copyright 2015 | AMBmagazine.com)
- File:St. Volodymyr's Cathedral, Kiev, Ukraine.jpg (© 2012-2014 Photogrammer)
- File:St. Nicholas Cathedral in the Pokrovsky monastery.jpg (Copyright © 2009 Наша Эпоха)
- File:Pokrovskaya church on Solomenka, Kiev.jpg (panoramio)
- File:Saint Volodymyr's Cathedral.jpg (http://touristclub.kiev.ua)
- File:Cathedral of the Three Anastasias.jpg (404 error)
- File:Villa Mariposa.jpg (https://www.m-a-k.net )
- File:Tereshchenko Diamond and Hope Diamond.jpg (no source for Hope diamond)
- File:127-meter yacht "Iolanda", a gift of Mikhail Tereshchenko to his wife. In the 1920s, Iolanda was the largest private yacht in the world.jpg (Photo by Debenham)
- File:Rosa 'Madame Olympe Tereshchenko', 1882.jpg (Copyright © 2016 Константин Вихляев и Юта Арбатская)
- File:Tereshchenko Diamond.jpg (http://famousdiamonds.tripod.com )
Taivo)) I thought you're a troll (are you?:) )! You have a misleading information on your profile page. But anyway. I don't understand Russian. The first TWO photos were provided me personally :) the fact they were already on internet, was logical for me as I thought it could help in references because I would be asked (BY YOU for example) to cite or provide a ref regarding the photo (wouldn't I? :) ) - but fine - we won't use them. As for the churches you may be right, MAY BE, some of them are free for posting on other websites..... I don't understand what's the problem to use a photo that is free? I didn't edit it. I provided a link (the old Wikipedia rules asked for the LINK if it was taken from internet). Anyways, I believe I should find photographers and ask for the photos of the churches in order to upload them here. And last, I manage Tereshchenkos Wiki pages, because I was permitted to do so, photos of their diamond, a rose, mansions etc belong to the Tereshchenko family, and I edit their pages. It's a huge name - Tereshchenko - so it's reasonable to be more subtle in expressions, I love my works, my pages, they deserve to have pages (duh), and I hope you undestand now why I was so upset when you deleted SO MANY pics all AT ONCE, ok? Let me know, please, what can be done, your thoughts and suggestions, how to recreate photos, I am currently blocked by Elcobbola smh, I sent her/him an email, but got no response, if you know her/him drop a few words or so, that I was unaware on what's going on, and had no idea, someone could disbelieve my contributions. Friendly, Cyberfoxy6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberfoxy6 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 01 October 2016 (UTC)--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 23:54, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Elizabeth Sarancheva.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes, of course, I should ask the photographer's name, BUT the photo is SO old, that wouldn't it be fair to be left in peace on Wikipedia?? Elizabeth has already passed away, the person was incredibly prominent.. But, for you, I WILL find out the details :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberfoxy6 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 01 October 2016 (UTC)--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 23:53, 1 October 2016 (UTC)--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 23:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Your account has been blocked edit
 | You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. |
- See, among others, the reupload of deleted copyvio File:Sofia Tereshchenko 2016.jpg as File:Sofia Tereshchenko.jpg and the personal attacks/COM:AGF failures here. Эlcobbola talk 21:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi! I have sent you an email, but I believe you have no wish to talk to me for unknown reason to me. Luckily, there's a page I actually can speak). First, I have just learned to use my TaklPage)))) Second, I have just realized about the notifications I was referred to, including photos) Thanks, for educative character and manner :) Third, and most important, I really thought Taivo was troll))))) as you have noticed I only edit Tereshchenkos pages, and my intentions to reupload to deleted photos were due my lack of knowledge on Wikipedia, now I know I have to see my TalkPage and use my voice to clarify the questions (if exist). There was nothing "personal" about Taivo, as I have no idea who was this, I visited his/her page and it was all about "trolling" information))) Idk why) so I made a conclusion smb hacked my pages, deleted information etc this is why I asked for Administration to HELP. If you understand me, please, let me know what you think about it, let me know if you can help me to advance my knowldge on Wikipedia tools and managing, I would be glad to talk to you. Friendly, Cyberfoxy6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberfoxy6 (talk • contribs) 23:30, 01 October 2016 (UTC)--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 23:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC) --Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 23:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 |
File:Sofia Tereshchenko - Europe's golden girl.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Эlcobbola talk 21:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
The photo has been provided to me with a personal permission. The fact some third part uploaded it on imgur (?) is unkonwn to me or to the subject of the photo, but isn't it a plus, when a Wikipedia subject in searchable on internet as well? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberfoxy6 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 01 October 2016 (UTC)--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 23:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Tereshchenko Yacht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Эlcobbola talk 21:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
The photo is old, and there is a name of a photgrapher for some of them. Gonna make sure to upload the one with the photographer name. BUT, again, the photo is veeeeeeeeery old, the photographer might not be able to answer me on wheather or not I can use it...what shall be done then? But I do have photos of a yacht in a free files, actually, I used them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberfoxy6 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 01 October 2016 (UTC)--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:00, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Simon Tereshchenko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Эlcobbola talk 21:15, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
The photo is also extremely old, the photographer's data will be found. The photo has been published in 2 books, in a museum, and belongs to the Tereshchenko family members. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberfoxy6 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 01 October 2016 (UTC)--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:00, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
| |
File:Princess Nadezhda.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Эlcobbola talk 21:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
I believe it's due to new google free files restrictions. No problems. You can delete it, if you wish so. New free photos will be coming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberfoxy6 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 01 October 2016 (UTC)--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:00, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Princess Nadezhda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Эlcobbola talk 21:21, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
In general, it was, logically, a free file. Could you be more specific on what exactly is misleading of this photo information? Thank you, and I'm looking forward to hearing from you! Cyberfoxy6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberfoxy6 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 01 October 2016 (UTC)--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:00, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Please sign your postings edit
--SignBot (talk) 23:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Signed. Thank You.--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Please sign your postings edit
--SignBot (talk) 23:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Signed. Thank You.--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Please sign your postings edit
--SignBot (talk) 23:31, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Signed. Thank You.--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Please sign your postings edit
--SignBot (talk) 23:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Signed. Thank You.--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Please sign your postings edit
--SignBot (talk) 23:37, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Signed. Thank You.--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Please sign your postings edit
--SignBot (talk) 23:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Signed. Thank You.--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Please sign your postings edit
--SignBot (talk) 23:42, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Signed. Thank You.--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Please sign your postings edit
--SignBot (talk) 23:44, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Signed. Thank You.--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Please sign your postings edit
--SignBot (talk) 00:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Signed. Thank You.--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Please sign your postings edit
--SignBot (talk) 00:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Signed. Thank You.--Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 00:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion edit
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)