Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, D.bratchuk!

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, D.bratchuk!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:46, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:NaVi-WCG.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:NaVi-WCG.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 22:19, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:NaVi-IEM4.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:NaVi-IEM4.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 22:19, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:NaVi-ESWC.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:NaVi-ESWC.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 22:19, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:NaVi-DreamHack.JPG edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:NaVi-DreamHack.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 22:19, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:NaVi-Azarov.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:NaVi-Azarov.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 22:19, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Пожалуйста, не портьте карты edit

Да, возможно, у Вас другое понимание цветов, чем у участников проекта Крым, но при перезаливке не ухудшайте качество карт, пожалуйста. То что вы сделали с Керченским полуостровом (Ленинским районом) - просто ужасно -- А.Крымов (talk) 19:08, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • Добрый вечер. Цвета я брал из аналогичных позиционных карт для других районов. Если бы у меня был оригинал в векторе - я бы с удовольствием его отредактировал с сохранением качества. Я согласен с тем, что в 100% размере карты выглядят неидеально, но я-то их проверял не в таком размере, а в статьях, подобных этой: ru:Грушевка (Судакский городской совет). И карты перекрашивал не по своей прихоти, а ввиду высказанных к ним вполне обоснованных претензий: ru:Википедия:К удалению/6 марта 2012#Шаблон:ПозКарта Украина Крым Ленинский район. Повторюсь, если вы подскажете, где взять карту этого района в векторном формате, я с удовольствием перезалью карту с цветами, согласованными с цветами на других картах Крыма. --D.bratchuk (talk) 21:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
    • Поскольку я был категорически против мнения о необходимости перекраски карт, то могу лишь обратить Ваше внимание на проблему (или ярко, но качественно; или стандартизировано, но некачественно). Исходники выданы не будут. Если я ещё имею желание что-то улучшать в проектах фонда Викимедиа, то автор этих карт (вложивший много времени в них, в том числе и в подбор цветов) с проектами Фонда больше не сотрудничает. Good luck! -- А.Крымов (talk) 13:39, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

SGKozlova [Ticket#2015091110003824] license permission edit

Dear Denis Bratchuk,
на адрес permissions-ru@wikimedia.org   были пересланы запросы на 
разрешение  от Н.И. Мацкевич (фотограф конференции), редакции газеты "Наука в Сибири", от А.А.Давыдова (фотографа Института физики г. Красноярск)  и от С.Г. Козловой   для 
создания странички для С.П. Габуды.

К сожалению, мы не получили ответа на наши запросы, и участник JuTa удалила все фотографии со странички Святослава Петровича Габуды. На наш вопрос почему это было сделано, сказано обращаться к Вам!

Пожалуйста, помогите выйти из этого круга. Вопрос касается умершего человека.....


С уважением,
Козлова Светлана Геннадьевна
Svetlana Kozlova,
Doctor of  Sciences,
Head laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Condensed Matter,
Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry,
Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia — Preceding unsigned comment added by SGKozlova (talk • contribs) 05:11, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Я вернулся. Посмотрю в течение нескольких дней, что можно сделать. Спасибо за напоминание, и извините, что так вышло с удалёнными файлами. --D.bratchuk (talk) 11:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Удаление картинок у SGKozlova edit

Dear D.bratchuk!


Наверное, возникли очередные проблемы? Может не могут найти письма? Все кто-отправлял письма-запросы на разрешение должны были в письмах указывать тему:Ticket#2015091110003824

С уважением,

SGKozlova — Preceding unsigned comment added by SGKozlova (talk • contribs) 03:39, 03 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

SGKozlova edit

Dear D.bratchuk!

К сожалению, что-то ничего не получается для станички хорошего человека и замечательного ученого. Может нужно мне заново просить прислать запросы? Насколько это будет эффективно?

СК — Preceding unsigned comment added by SGKozlova (talk • contribs) 06:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Удаление картинок у SGKozlova edit

Dear D.bratchuk!

Мне сообщили, что запросы на разрешение размещения картинок на страничке, сделанной мною, были найдены. Пожалуйста, объясните, что мешает восстановить картинки? Могу ли я быть чем-то полезной? Все что в моих силах я сделаю.

Пользователь

SGKozlova — Preceding unsigned comment added by SGKozlova (talk • contribs) 03:34, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

SGKozlova [Ticket#2015091110003824] license permission edit

Dear D.bratchuk!

Пожалуйста, объясните, что происходит с моей страничкой. Мы все сделали, как требовали. А теперь у многих участников этого процесса мои запросы удалены в архив!? Что я должна сделать, чтобы восстановить картинки?

SGKozlova — Preceding unsigned comment added by SGKozlova (talk • contribs) 06:36, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Cybersport-portal.jpg edit

 
File:Cybersport-portal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

czar 21:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply